Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163
Resumo: This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed by the article “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012”, in the search to offer doctrinal and empirical evidences that allowed to expand the academic dialogue on the implantation of the National Database of Genetic Profiles (BNPG). For that, we conducted exploratory and qualitative research, developed from documentation of doctrine, empirical work, judgments and rules related to the Brazilian and foreign databases. It is possible to recognize the possibility of using different references from the one presented by the article in question and, thus, the scope of contrary conclusions, particularly regarding the offense to the principle nemo tenetur is detegere in the application of Law 12,654 / 2012. Furthermore, important limitations in relation to the reduction of crime rates and the increase in DNA databases need to be emphasized.
id IBRASPP-1_160d91d755733ee31bb321468a164b1a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/163
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012Crítica científica de "Investigação criminal genética – banco de perfis genéticos, fornecimento compulsório de amostra biológica e prazo de armazenamento de dados" - Apontamentos sobre a inconstitucionalidade da Lei 12.654/2012Law 12.654/2012forensic DNAconstitutionality.Lei 12.654/2012DNA forenseconstitucionalidade.This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed by the article “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012”, in the search to offer doctrinal and empirical evidences that allowed to expand the academic dialogue on the implantation of the National Database of Genetic Profiles (BNPG). For that, we conducted exploratory and qualitative research, developed from documentation of doctrine, empirical work, judgments and rules related to the Brazilian and foreign databases. It is possible to recognize the possibility of using different references from the one presented by the article in question and, thus, the scope of contrary conclusions, particularly regarding the offense to the principle nemo tenetur is detegere in the application of Law 12,654 / 2012. Furthermore, important limitations in relation to the reduction of crime rates and the increase in DNA databases need to be emphasized.Esta crítica científica partiu do que foi proposto pelo artigo "Investigação criminal genética – banco de perfis genéticos, fornecimento compulsório de amostra biológica e prazo de armazenamento de dados", na busca de oferecer evidências doutrinárias e empíricas que permitissem ampliar o diálogo acadêmico sobre a implantação do Banco Nacional de Perfis Genético (BNPG). Para tanto, realizou-se pesquisa exploratória e qualitativa, desenvolvida a partir de documentação da doutrina, trabalhos empíricos, julgados e normas relacionadas ao banco brasileiro e congêneres estrangeiros. É possível reconhecer a possibilidade do uso de referenciais diversos do apresentado pelo artigo em comento e, assim, o alcance de conclusões contrárias no que se refere, especialmente à ofensa ao princípio nemo tenetur se detegere na aplicação da Lei 12.654/2012. Além disso, limitações importantes quando à relação entre a redução de taxas de crime e o incremento dos bancos de perfis genéticos precisam ser enfatizadas.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-06-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/16310.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.163Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018); 889-900Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2018); 889-900Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 2 (2018); 889-900Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 2 (2018); 889-9002525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163/130Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Grazinoli Garridoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli2018-06-17T21:16:42Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/163Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-06-17T21:16:42Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
Crítica científica de "Investigação criminal genética – banco de perfis genéticos, fornecimento compulsório de amostra biológica e prazo de armazenamento de dados" - Apontamentos sobre a inconstitucionalidade da Lei 12.654/2012
title Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
spellingShingle Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli
Law 12.654/2012
forensic DNA
constitutionality.
Lei 12.654/2012
DNA forense
constitucionalidade.
title_short Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
title_full Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
title_fullStr Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
title_full_unstemmed Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
title_sort Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
author Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli
author_facet Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law 12.654/2012
forensic DNA
constitutionality.
Lei 12.654/2012
DNA forense
constitucionalidade.
topic Law 12.654/2012
forensic DNA
constitutionality.
Lei 12.654/2012
DNA forense
constitucionalidade.
description This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed by the article “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012”, in the search to offer doctrinal and empirical evidences that allowed to expand the academic dialogue on the implantation of the National Database of Genetic Profiles (BNPG). For that, we conducted exploratory and qualitative research, developed from documentation of doctrine, empirical work, judgments and rules related to the Brazilian and foreign databases. It is possible to recognize the possibility of using different references from the one presented by the article in question and, thus, the scope of contrary conclusions, particularly regarding the offense to the principle nemo tenetur is detegere in the application of Law 12,654 / 2012. Furthermore, important limitations in relation to the reduction of crime rates and the increase in DNA databases need to be emphasized.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.163
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.163
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163/130
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Grazinoli Garrido
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Grazinoli Garrido
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018); 889-900
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2018); 889-900
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 2 (2018); 889-900
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 2 (2018); 889-900
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329401777061888