Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/50 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to examine whether the plea bargaining in the context of “Lava Jato” Operation is adopting a third route of criminal law against administrative corruption, in which reparation of damages is established as one of the primary objectives of criminal prosecution, in substitution or mitigation of the restrictive sentence of the collaborating defendants. Subsequent to this analysis, it is intended to reflect if the adoption of a third route of criminal law by means of these negotiating instruments could imply in the utilitarian mercantilization of the criminal process prejudicial to the principle of criminal legality, proportionality and isonomy in the application of the punishment. This is a necessary and pertinent analysis due to the protagonism that the plea-bargaining have been assuming in the discovery of great corruption schemes in Brazil and the recovery of assets. The procedural methodology is the bibliographic and the method of approach is the hypothetico-deductive one, besides the case study involving “Lava Jato” operation. The hypothesis worked out is that the award-winning collaboration agreements have externalized a third-way criminal law and that there is a viability of violations of isonomy and criminal legality in fight against administrative corruption. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_62817e3e03634241a4836af0fa54c447 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/50 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruptionA colaboração premiada como terceira via do direito penal no enfrentamento à corrupção administrativa organizadaPlea-bargainingThird route of criminal lawAdministrative Corruption OrganizedCriminal LegalityProportionality.Colaboração premiadaTerceira via do direito penalCorrução Administrativa OrganizadaLegalidade PenalProporcionalidade.The purpose of this article is to examine whether the plea bargaining in the context of “Lava Jato” Operation is adopting a third route of criminal law against administrative corruption, in which reparation of damages is established as one of the primary objectives of criminal prosecution, in substitution or mitigation of the restrictive sentence of the collaborating defendants. Subsequent to this analysis, it is intended to reflect if the adoption of a third route of criminal law by means of these negotiating instruments could imply in the utilitarian mercantilization of the criminal process prejudicial to the principle of criminal legality, proportionality and isonomy in the application of the punishment. This is a necessary and pertinent analysis due to the protagonism that the plea-bargaining have been assuming in the discovery of great corruption schemes in Brazil and the recovery of assets. The procedural methodology is the bibliographic and the method of approach is the hypothetico-deductive one, besides the case study involving “Lava Jato” operation. The hypothesis worked out is that the award-winning collaboration agreements have externalized a third-way criminal law and that there is a viability of violations of isonomy and criminal legality in fight against administrative corruption.Este artigo tem por escopo examinar se os acordos de colaboração premiada celebrados no âmbito da Operação Lava Jato estão adotando um modelo de direito penal de terceira via no enfrentamento à corrupção administrativa, em que erige a reparação do dano como um dos objetivos primordiais da persecução penal, em substituição ou atenuação da pena restritiva de liberdade dos réus colaboradores. Posteriormente a esta análise, pretende-se refletir se a adoção de um direito penal de terceira via por meio destes instrumentos negociais poderia implicar em mercantilização utilitária do processo penal lesiva ao princípio da legalidade penal, da proporcionalidade e da isonomia na aplicação da pena. Trata-se de uma análise necessária e pertinente em razão do protagonismo que os acordos de colaboração premiada vêm assumindo no descobrimento de grandes esquemas de corrupção no Brasil e na recuperação de ativos. A metodologia procedimental é a bibliográfica e o método de abordagem é o hipotético-dedutivo, além do estudo de caso envolvendo a Operação Lava Jato. A hipótese trabalhada é a de que os acordos de colaboração premiada vêm exteriorizando um direito penal de terceira via e que há com isso viabilidade de violações à legalidade penal, à proporcionalidade e à isonomia no enfrentamento à corrupção administrativa. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/5010.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.50Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 285-314Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 285-314Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 285-314Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 285-3142525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/50/60Copyright (c) 2017 Marcelo Rodrigues da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues da Silva, Marcelo2017-06-08T17:40:58Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/50Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2017-06-08T17:40:58Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption A colaboração premiada como terceira via do direito penal no enfrentamento à corrupção administrativa organizada |
title |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption |
spellingShingle |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption Rodrigues da Silva, Marcelo Plea-bargaining Third route of criminal law Administrative Corruption Organized Criminal Legality Proportionality. Colaboração premiada Terceira via do direito penal Corrução Administrativa Organizada Legalidade Penal Proporcionalidade. |
title_short |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption |
title_full |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption |
title_fullStr |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption |
title_full_unstemmed |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption |
title_sort |
Plea bargaining as a third route of criminal law in the fight against organized administrative corruption |
author |
Rodrigues da Silva, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Rodrigues da Silva, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues da Silva, Marcelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Plea-bargaining Third route of criminal law Administrative Corruption Organized Criminal Legality Proportionality. Colaboração premiada Terceira via do direito penal Corrução Administrativa Organizada Legalidade Penal Proporcionalidade. |
topic |
Plea-bargaining Third route of criminal law Administrative Corruption Organized Criminal Legality Proportionality. Colaboração premiada Terceira via do direito penal Corrução Administrativa Organizada Legalidade Penal Proporcionalidade. |
description |
The purpose of this article is to examine whether the plea bargaining in the context of “Lava Jato” Operation is adopting a third route of criminal law against administrative corruption, in which reparation of damages is established as one of the primary objectives of criminal prosecution, in substitution or mitigation of the restrictive sentence of the collaborating defendants. Subsequent to this analysis, it is intended to reflect if the adoption of a third route of criminal law by means of these negotiating instruments could imply in the utilitarian mercantilization of the criminal process prejudicial to the principle of criminal legality, proportionality and isonomy in the application of the punishment. This is a necessary and pertinent analysis due to the protagonism that the plea-bargaining have been assuming in the discovery of great corruption schemes in Brazil and the recovery of assets. The procedural methodology is the bibliographic and the method of approach is the hypothetico-deductive one, besides the case study involving “Lava Jato” operation. The hypothesis worked out is that the award-winning collaboration agreements have externalized a third-way criminal law and that there is a viability of violations of isonomy and criminal legality in fight against administrative corruption. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/50 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.50 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/50 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.50 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/50/60 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Marcelo Rodrigues da Silva info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Marcelo Rodrigues da Silva |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 285-314 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 285-314 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 285-314 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 285-314 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281939883950080 |