Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Danielle Leite
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/7598
Resumo: The Non-Perecution Agreement, brought by Law 13.964/2019, was implemented with the objective of containing the procedural slowness and the collapsing prison system, in the search to guarantee the priority of the financial and human resources of the Public Prosecution Service and the Judiciary for the most serious crimes. However, the implementation of ANPP and the absence of criminal procedure, opens wide discussion about the withdrawal of constitutional guarantees from individuals. Furthermore, it opens questions about the function of the operators of the Law, since it removes the jurisdictional power, since, through the institute, the judge acts as a mere homologator of the conditions proposed by the Public Prosecutor. Thus, this procedure has weakened the limits that were foreseen by the Constitution of the Republic and the Penal Code, when it attributed to the Public Prosecutor's Office the powers regarding the attribution of sentences, since such powers are legally reserved for magistrates. Furthermore, the penalties imposed resemble the general extra-penal effects of sentencing, without the accused having, in fact, gone through the due criminal process or even been convicted. Therefore, the present work will be dedicated to analyze the Non-Perecution Agreement in light of Law 13.964/2019 and also to make a comparison with the North American plea bargaining. In addition, it proposes to describe the function of criminal procedure in the Democratic State of Law; to conceptualize the Constitutional Principles of Criminal Procedure; to analyze Law 13.964/2019 and the changes in Criminal Procedure. Methodologically, bibliographic and documentary research was chosen.
id Ânima_4e347579f5dc2ce969d4502ace0d5f48
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/7598
network_acronym_str Ânima
network_name_str Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
repository_id_str
spelling Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargainingAgreement of no criminal persecution in the light of law 13.964 / 2019: a comparison to plea bargainingAcordo de Não Persecução PenalPlea BargainingProcesso penalThe Non-Perecution Agreement, brought by Law 13.964/2019, was implemented with the objective of containing the procedural slowness and the collapsing prison system, in the search to guarantee the priority of the financial and human resources of the Public Prosecution Service and the Judiciary for the most serious crimes. However, the implementation of ANPP and the absence of criminal procedure, opens wide discussion about the withdrawal of constitutional guarantees from individuals. Furthermore, it opens questions about the function of the operators of the Law, since it removes the jurisdictional power, since, through the institute, the judge acts as a mere homologator of the conditions proposed by the Public Prosecutor. Thus, this procedure has weakened the limits that were foreseen by the Constitution of the Republic and the Penal Code, when it attributed to the Public Prosecutor's Office the powers regarding the attribution of sentences, since such powers are legally reserved for magistrates. Furthermore, the penalties imposed resemble the general extra-penal effects of sentencing, without the accused having, in fact, gone through the due criminal process or even been convicted. Therefore, the present work will be dedicated to analyze the Non-Perecution Agreement in light of Law 13.964/2019 and also to make a comparison with the North American plea bargaining. In addition, it proposes to describe the function of criminal procedure in the Democratic State of Law; to conceptualize the Constitutional Principles of Criminal Procedure; to analyze Law 13.964/2019 and the changes in Criminal Procedure. Methodologically, bibliographic and documentary research was chosen.O Acordo de Não Persecução Penal, trazido pela Lei nº 13.964/2019, foi implementado com o objetivo de conter a morosidade processual e o colapsante sistema prisional, na busca por garantir a prioridade dos recursos financeiros e humanos do Ministério Público e do Poder Judiciário para os crimes mais graves. Entretanto, a implementação do ANPP e a ausência do processo penal, abre vasta discussão acerca da retirada das garantias constitucionais dos indivíduos. Ademais, abre questionamentos acerca da função dos operadores do Direito, visto que retira o poder jurisdicionado, uma vez que, por meio do instituto, o juiz age como mero homologador das condições proposta pelo Ministério Público. Assim, o referido procedimento enfraqueceu limites que foram previstos pela Constituição da República e pelo Código Penal, quando atribuiu ao Ministério Público as competências relativas à atribuição de penas, visto que tais competências são legalmente reservadas aos magistrados. Outrossim, as penas impostas se assemelham a efeitos extrapenais genéricos da condenação, sem que, de fato, o acusado tenha passado pelo devido processo penal, nem mesmo tenha sido condenado. Portanto, o presente trabalho dedicar-se-á a analisar o Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019 e, ainda, realizar comparativo com o plea bargaining norte-americano. Além disso, propõe descrever a função do processo penal no Estado Democrático de Direito; conceituar os Princípios Constitucionais do Processo Penal; analisar a Lei 13.964/2019 e as modificações no Processo Penal. Metodologicamente, optou-se pela pesquisa bibliográfica e documental.Caldeira, Fátima HassanFerreira, Danielle Leite2020-07-10T11:39:18Z2020-11-27T06:52:57Z2020-07-10T11:39:18Z2020-11-27T06:52:57Z2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis65 f.application/pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/7598Direito - AraranguáAraranguáAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2020-12-02T00:32:26Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/7598Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2020-12-02T00:32:26Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining
Agreement of no criminal persecution in the light of law 13.964 / 2019: a comparison to plea bargaining
title Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining
spellingShingle Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining
Ferreira, Danielle Leite
Acordo de Não Persecução Penal
Plea Bargaining
Processo penal
title_short Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining
title_full Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining
title_fullStr Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining
title_full_unstemmed Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining
title_sort Acordo de Não Persecução Penal à luz da Lei 13.964/2019: uma comparação ao plea bargaining
author Ferreira, Danielle Leite
author_facet Ferreira, Danielle Leite
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Caldeira, Fátima Hassan
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Danielle Leite
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acordo de Não Persecução Penal
Plea Bargaining
Processo penal
topic Acordo de Não Persecução Penal
Plea Bargaining
Processo penal
description The Non-Perecution Agreement, brought by Law 13.964/2019, was implemented with the objective of containing the procedural slowness and the collapsing prison system, in the search to guarantee the priority of the financial and human resources of the Public Prosecution Service and the Judiciary for the most serious crimes. However, the implementation of ANPP and the absence of criminal procedure, opens wide discussion about the withdrawal of constitutional guarantees from individuals. Furthermore, it opens questions about the function of the operators of the Law, since it removes the jurisdictional power, since, through the institute, the judge acts as a mere homologator of the conditions proposed by the Public Prosecutor. Thus, this procedure has weakened the limits that were foreseen by the Constitution of the Republic and the Penal Code, when it attributed to the Public Prosecutor's Office the powers regarding the attribution of sentences, since such powers are legally reserved for magistrates. Furthermore, the penalties imposed resemble the general extra-penal effects of sentencing, without the accused having, in fact, gone through the due criminal process or even been convicted. Therefore, the present work will be dedicated to analyze the Non-Perecution Agreement in light of Law 13.964/2019 and also to make a comparison with the North American plea bargaining. In addition, it proposes to describe the function of criminal procedure in the Democratic State of Law; to conceptualize the Constitutional Principles of Criminal Procedure; to analyze Law 13.964/2019 and the changes in Criminal Procedure. Methodologically, bibliographic and documentary research was chosen.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-10T11:39:18Z
2020-11-27T06:52:57Z
2020-07-10T11:39:18Z
2020-11-27T06:52:57Z
2020
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/7598
url https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/7598
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Direito - Araranguá
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 65 f.
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Araranguá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
instname:Ânima Educação
instacron:Ânima
instname_str Ânima Educação
instacron_str Ânima
institution Ânima
reponame_str Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
collection Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@animaeducacao.com.br
_version_ 1767415845182504960