Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163 |
Resumo: | This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed by the article “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012”, in the search to offer doctrinal and empirical evidences that allowed to expand the academic dialogue on the implantation of the National Database of Genetic Profiles (BNPG). For that, we conducted exploratory and qualitative research, developed from documentation of doctrine, empirical work, judgments and rules related to the Brazilian and foreign databases. It is possible to recognize the possibility of using different references from the one presented by the article in question and, thus, the scope of contrary conclusions, particularly regarding the offense to the principle nemo tenetur is detegere in the application of Law 12,654 / 2012. Furthermore, important limitations in relation to the reduction of crime rates and the increase in DNA databases need to be emphasized. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_a730c95c0bf3d62ead0c3ef50c1e7a2f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/163 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012Crítica científica de "Investigação criminal genética – banco de perfis genéticos, fornecimento compulsório de amostra biológica e prazo de armazenamento de dados" - Apontamentos sobre a inconstitucionalidade da Lei 12.654/2012Law 12.654/2012forensic DNAconstitutionality.Lei 12.654/2012DNA forenseconstitucionalidade.This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed by the article “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012”, in the search to offer doctrinal and empirical evidences that allowed to expand the academic dialogue on the implantation of the National Database of Genetic Profiles (BNPG). For that, we conducted exploratory and qualitative research, developed from documentation of doctrine, empirical work, judgments and rules related to the Brazilian and foreign databases. It is possible to recognize the possibility of using different references from the one presented by the article in question and, thus, the scope of contrary conclusions, particularly regarding the offense to the principle nemo tenetur is detegere in the application of Law 12,654 / 2012. Furthermore, important limitations in relation to the reduction of crime rates and the increase in DNA databases need to be emphasized.Esta crítica científica partiu do que foi proposto pelo artigo "Investigação criminal genética – banco de perfis genéticos, fornecimento compulsório de amostra biológica e prazo de armazenamento de dados", na busca de oferecer evidências doutrinárias e empíricas que permitissem ampliar o diálogo acadêmico sobre a implantação do Banco Nacional de Perfis Genético (BNPG). Para tanto, realizou-se pesquisa exploratória e qualitativa, desenvolvida a partir de documentação da doutrina, trabalhos empíricos, julgados e normas relacionadas ao banco brasileiro e congêneres estrangeiros. É possível reconhecer a possibilidade do uso de referenciais diversos do apresentado pelo artigo em comento e, assim, o alcance de conclusões contrárias no que se refere, especialmente à ofensa ao princípio nemo tenetur se detegere na aplicação da Lei 12.654/2012. Além disso, limitações importantes quando à relação entre a redução de taxas de crime e o incremento dos bancos de perfis genéticos precisam ser enfatizadas.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-06-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/16310.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.163Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018); 889-900Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2018); 889-900Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 2 (2018); 889-900Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 2 (2018); 889-9002525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163/130Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Grazinoli Garridoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli2018-06-17T21:16:42Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/163Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-06-17T21:16:42Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012 Crítica científica de "Investigação criminal genética – banco de perfis genéticos, fornecimento compulsório de amostra biológica e prazo de armazenamento de dados" - Apontamentos sobre a inconstitucionalidade da Lei 12.654/2012 |
title |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012 |
spellingShingle |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012 Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli Law 12.654/2012 forensic DNA constitutionality. Lei 12.654/2012 DNA forense constitucionalidade. |
title_short |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012 |
title_full |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012 |
title_fullStr |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012 |
title_sort |
Scientific criticism of “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012 |
author |
Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli |
author_facet |
Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garrido, Rodrigo Grazinoli |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Law 12.654/2012 forensic DNA constitutionality. Lei 12.654/2012 DNA forense constitucionalidade. |
topic |
Law 12.654/2012 forensic DNA constitutionality. Lei 12.654/2012 DNA forense constitucionalidade. |
description |
This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed by the article “DNA criminal investigation – DNA database, mandatory DNA collection and time limit for data retention” - Notes on the unconstitutionality of Law 12.654/2012”, in the search to offer doctrinal and empirical evidences that allowed to expand the academic dialogue on the implantation of the National Database of Genetic Profiles (BNPG). For that, we conducted exploratory and qualitative research, developed from documentation of doctrine, empirical work, judgments and rules related to the Brazilian and foreign databases. It is possible to recognize the possibility of using different references from the one presented by the article in question and, thus, the scope of contrary conclusions, particularly regarding the offense to the principle nemo tenetur is detegere in the application of Law 12,654 / 2012. Furthermore, important limitations in relation to the reduction of crime rates and the increase in DNA databases need to be emphasized. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.163 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.163 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/163/130 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Grazinoli Garrido info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Grazinoli Garrido |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018); 889-900 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2018); 889-900 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 2 (2018); 889-900 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 2 (2018); 889-900 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281939994050560 |