People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
Texto Completo: | https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/717 |
Resumo: | This article aims to evaluate a people management model guided by the logic of the competencies, implemented ten years ago. The evaluation was based on the methodological premises of validation and legitimation of competence management models proposed by Markus, Cooper-Thomas and Alpress (2005). The categories considered were: constitutive definition, construct validity (content validity, face validity and reliability) and predictive validity. The research strategy was the descriptive case study, in which the information has been consolidated through the triangulation of the data acquired from documents, reports and interviews. There have been done twenty nine interviews with people identified as essential sources for the research, as such the project consultant, employees, managers, directors and the CEO of the company. It has been founded low consistence with respect to the accomplishment of the validation requirements. The results showed that the model analyzed presents operational problems, problems related to the comprehension of meanings and problems related to the organization, management and fulfillment of premises. In sum, the evaluation process has demonstrated weaknesses of the researched model related to the conceptual alignment, reach of the proposed objectives and guidance for the verification of the predictive validity. It has also been observed low credibility of the model for guiding hires, promotions, remunerations and development. The present study has showed that the evaluation of competence models through validation criterions promotes the approximation of premises, actions and results. |
id |
MACKENZIE_d9e44fce9d50647db40d1ca6dc6f371e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/717 |
network_acronym_str |
MACKENZIE |
network_name_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementationGestión de personas por competencias : análisis de las repercusiones diez anos posteriores a la implementaciónGestão de pessoas por competências: análise de repercussões dez anos pós-implantaçãoManagement modelPeople managementCompetence managementCompetence modelValidation processModelo de gestiónGestión de personasGestión de competenciasModelo de competenciaProceso de validaciónModelo de gestãoGestão de pessoasGestão de competênciasModelo de competênciasProcesso de validaçãoThis article aims to evaluate a people management model guided by the logic of the competencies, implemented ten years ago. The evaluation was based on the methodological premises of validation and legitimation of competence management models proposed by Markus, Cooper-Thomas and Alpress (2005). The categories considered were: constitutive definition, construct validity (content validity, face validity and reliability) and predictive validity. The research strategy was the descriptive case study, in which the information has been consolidated through the triangulation of the data acquired from documents, reports and interviews. There have been done twenty nine interviews with people identified as essential sources for the research, as such the project consultant, employees, managers, directors and the CEO of the company. It has been founded low consistence with respect to the accomplishment of the validation requirements. The results showed that the model analyzed presents operational problems, problems related to the comprehension of meanings and problems related to the organization, management and fulfillment of premises. In sum, the evaluation process has demonstrated weaknesses of the researched model related to the conceptual alignment, reach of the proposed objectives and guidance for the verification of the predictive validity. It has also been observed low credibility of the model for guiding hires, promotions, remunerations and development. The present study has showed that the evaluation of competence models through validation criterions promotes the approximation of premises, actions and results.Se espera, en el presente artículo, evaluar un modelo de gestión de personas articulado por competencias, implantado desde hace diez años, a la luz de las premisas de validación y legitimación de modelos de gestión de competencias adaptadas del camino metodológico recorrido por Markus, Cooper-Thomas y Alpress (2005). Las categorías consideradas son: definición constitutiva, validad de constructo (validad de contenido, validad de cara y confiabilidad) y validad predictiva. La estrategia de investigación fue el estudio de caso descriptivo, en el cual las informaciones se consolidaron a partir de la triangulación de datos advenidos de documentos, informes y entrevistas. Éstas, realizadas con veintinueve personas identificadas como fuentes esenciales para la investigación tal como el consultor del proyecto, funcionarios, gerentes, directores y el presidente de la empresa. Se encontró baja consistencia en relación al cumplimiento de las exigencias de validación. Los resultados demostraron que el modelo presenta problemas operacionales, problemas de comprensión de conceptos, e problemas de de gestión y de incumplimiento de premisas. En resumen, el proceso evaluativo permitió destacar debilidades en relación al alineamiento conceptual, alcance de los objetivos deseados y direccionamientos para verificación de la validad predictiva. Además de eso, se verificó baja credibilidad del modelo para orientar contrataciones, promociones, remuneración y desarrollo. El presente estudio demostró que la evaluación de modelos de competencias, a partir de criterios de validación, se presenta como un camino que fomenta la aproximación de premisas, acciones y resultados.Este artigo tem como objetivo avaliar um modelo de gestão de pessoas articulado por competências implementado há dez anos. A avaliação foi feita com base nas premissas metodológicas de validação e legitimação de modelos de gestão de competências propostas por Markus, Cooper-Thomas e Allpress (2005). As categorias consideradas foram: definição constitutiva, validade de construto (validade de conteúdo, validade de face e confiabilidade) e validade preditiva. A estratégia de pesquisa foi o estudo de caso descritivo, no qual as informações foram consolidadas a partir da triangulação de dados advindos de documentos, relatórios e entrevistas. Foram feitas 29 entrevistas com pessoas identificadas como fontes essenciais para a pesquisa, tais como o consultor do projeto, funcionários, gerentes, diretores e o presidente da empresa. Encontrou-se baixa consistência em relação ao cumprimento das exigências de validação. Os resultados demonstraram que o modelo analisado apresenta problemas operacionais, problemas relacionados à compreensão de conceitos e problemas relacionados a organização, gestão e cumprimento de premissas. Em suma, o processo avaliativo demonstrou fragilidades do modelo pesquisado em relação a alinhamento conceitual, alcance dos objetivos propostos e direcionamentos para verificação da validade preditiva. Também se verificou baixa credibilidade do modelo para orientar contratações, promoções, remuneração e desenvolvimento. O presente estudo demonstrou que a avaliação de modelos de competências a partir de critérios de validação promove a aproximação de premissas, ações e resultados.Editora Mackenzie2010-11-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.ms-powerpointhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/717Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2011)Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2011)Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 12 n. 1 (2011)1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEporhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/717/2632https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/717/8155Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMunck, LucianoMunck, Mariana MusettiSouza, Rafael Borim de2011-02-28T18:12:01Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/717Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2024-04-19T17:00:36.271235RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation Gestión de personas por competencias : análisis de las repercusiones diez anos posteriores a la implementación Gestão de pessoas por competências: análise de repercussões dez anos pós-implantação |
title |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation |
spellingShingle |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation Munck, Luciano Management model People management Competence management Competence model Validation process Modelo de gestión Gestión de personas Gestión de competencias Modelo de competencia Proceso de validación Modelo de gestão Gestão de pessoas Gestão de competências Modelo de competências Processo de validação |
title_short |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation |
title_full |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation |
title_fullStr |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation |
title_full_unstemmed |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation |
title_sort |
People management by competence: repercussions’ analyses ten years after the implementation |
author |
Munck, Luciano |
author_facet |
Munck, Luciano Munck, Mariana Musetti Souza, Rafael Borim de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Munck, Mariana Musetti Souza, Rafael Borim de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Munck, Luciano Munck, Mariana Musetti Souza, Rafael Borim de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Management model People management Competence management Competence model Validation process Modelo de gestión Gestión de personas Gestión de competencias Modelo de competencia Proceso de validación Modelo de gestão Gestão de pessoas Gestão de competências Modelo de competências Processo de validação |
topic |
Management model People management Competence management Competence model Validation process Modelo de gestión Gestión de personas Gestión de competencias Modelo de competencia Proceso de validación Modelo de gestão Gestão de pessoas Gestão de competências Modelo de competências Processo de validação |
description |
This article aims to evaluate a people management model guided by the logic of the competencies, implemented ten years ago. The evaluation was based on the methodological premises of validation and legitimation of competence management models proposed by Markus, Cooper-Thomas and Alpress (2005). The categories considered were: constitutive definition, construct validity (content validity, face validity and reliability) and predictive validity. The research strategy was the descriptive case study, in which the information has been consolidated through the triangulation of the data acquired from documents, reports and interviews. There have been done twenty nine interviews with people identified as essential sources for the research, as such the project consultant, employees, managers, directors and the CEO of the company. It has been founded low consistence with respect to the accomplishment of the validation requirements. The results showed that the model analyzed presents operational problems, problems related to the comprehension of meanings and problems related to the organization, management and fulfillment of premises. In sum, the evaluation process has demonstrated weaknesses of the researched model related to the conceptual alignment, reach of the proposed objectives and guidance for the verification of the predictive validity. It has also been observed low credibility of the model for guiding hires, promotions, remunerations and development. The present study has showed that the evaluation of competence models through validation criterions promotes the approximation of premises, actions and results. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-11-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/717 |
url |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/717 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/717/2632 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/717/8155 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.ms-powerpoint |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2011) Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2011) Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 12 n. 1 (2011) 1678-6971 1518-6776 reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) instacron:MACKENZIE |
instname_str |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
instacron_str |
MACKENZIE |
institution |
MACKENZIE |
reponame_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
collection |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.adm@mackenzie.br |
_version_ |
1796794716878012416 |