Garantia constitucional da presunção de inocência: voto do preso provisório no Brasil

• Autor(a) principal: Dias, Dorisney de Carvalho
• Data de Publicação: 2009
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/36826
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PENAL::DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL; Voto do preso provisório; Cidadania; Dignidade da pessoa humana; Presunção de inocência; Prisioner right of voting; Citizenhood; Human right; Presumption of innocence

The present research analyzes the vote of provisory prisioner in Brazil, through bibliographical, legal system and jurisprudencial study. And the applicability of art. 15,III, of the Federal Constitution of 1988, that restricts the right of voting just to the prisoner condemned with judged transit in of the conviction. It considers the importance of the vote as exercise of the citizenship in the Democratic State of Right. Identifing the importance of voting prcess as the effetiviness of citizenhood in a Democratic State, considering the participation of the population in the election process as a sharing of politics responsibility. It verifies which is the historically relation between freedom privation and lack of voting right in the Constitutions of Brazil. It analyzes the aspects related to the guarantee of the basic rights as the fulfilment of the Law of Criminal Execution that must be assured by the State to the prisoner, and the difference of treatment that must be reserved the provisory prisioner. For the data consolidated from 2003 to 2007, the growth of the provisory prisioners in Brazil is verified. It concludes that the non-observance of the constitutional guarantee of voting to the provisory prisioner, in many States violates the human rights due to the fact that the provisory prisioner receives treatment as if he was condemned. Bisides that, the State of São Paulo that has more than one third of the provisory prisioners of Brazil does not provide the right of voting to them . In this manner, the beginning of the presumption of the innocence assured for the Brazilian Constitution to every provisory prisioner it`s not effective in the current reality.