O dever de accountability e a colisão entre direitos fundamentais: uma análise da fundamentação da decisão sobre o Tema 786 do STF

• Autor(a) principal: Conehero, Milena Preiori Serodio
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/31781
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO; Direito constitucional; Accountability; Direitos fundamentais; Colisão entre direitos fundamentais; Tema 786 STF; Direito ao esquecimento; Constitutional law; Accountability; Fundamental rights; Fundamental rights collision; STF Theme 786; Right to be forgotten

The chosen theme consists of the analysis of the fulfillment of the Accountability duty by the Judiciary, studying the way decisions about the collision between fundamental rights are grounded. It is by providing reasons based on rational and legal criteria that society, as well as other democratic institutions, can control the actions of the Judiciary and guarantee that they are in conformity with the legal system. Fundamental rights, due to their principiological characteristics, when in collision, demand a more specific reasoning, to justify its reasoning and the reasons that led it to decide on the prevalence of one fundamental right over another, to make use of the maximum possible logical reasoning, absent of decisional subjectivism. For this reason, this paper will seek to understand the rationale of this collision in STF theme 786