A convenção de arbitragem no Código de Processo Civil

• Autor(a) principal: Pinto, João Pedro Alves
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/31386
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Arbitragem; Direito processual civil; Convenção de arbitragem; Código de Processo Civil; Alegação; Preliminar de contestação; Réu; Processo; Arbitration; Civil procedure; Arbitration agreement.; Code of civil procedure; Claim; Answer; Defendant; Lawsuit

This paper seeks to critically analyze the item X of article 337 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Law No. 13.105 of March 16, 2015), which charged the defendant with arguing, only in a preliminary objection, the existence of an arbitration agreement. Therefore, a brief historical contextualization of alternative means of conflict resolution will be conducted in order to analyze, in detail, the characteristics of Brazilian arbitration. In addition, this paper will also analyze the substitutions proposed by the House of Representativesto Bill No. 8.046-A of 2010, authored by Senator José Sarney (PMDB/AP). Such substitutions rightly provided that the existence of arbitration agreement could be alleged by the defendant of the lawsuit before the offering of its answer, notably in the conciliation or mediation hearing, which would result in the suspension of the main lawsuit. Finally, this paper will demonstrate the numerous negative consequences of the final text of the Civil Procedure Code regarding the allegation of the existence of an arbitration agreement and propose possible solutions, with the aim of reducing the losses from these negative consequences that will be borne, as a rule, by the defendant in the lawsuit