Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6644
Resumo: The present study had as its scope, the delimitation of the legal concept of the Due Process of Law clause, in its substantial sense and its implication in the exercise of the administrative function. The mentioned clause is one of the oldest and intrinsic institutes of the Rule of Law. In its incipient form, the Due Process of Law clause represented one of the first methods to control the despotic power. Thenceforth, it was the skeleton for the rise of many others institutes that limits the State Power. From the formal procedural aspect procedural instruments (full defense and the right to appeal, motivation of the State decisions duty, among others), up to reaching the merits of the decision control (originally accepted as reasonableness judgment), this last one known as Substantial Due Process of Law. Occurs that this range of principles typically assigned to the Substantial Due Process of Law clause (reasonableness, proportionality, motivation) has express and specific legal provision in the normative text, demonstrating an emptying of its content in the Brazilian legal order. Nevertheless, it‟s a duty for the legal scholar to apply sense and unity to the judicial system. Within the national legal system, the mentioned principle reveals itself as a command to the law enforcer to seek the best ruling. The best ruling is the one, firstly, that promotes the public interest duty (therefore, preceded by a direct judgment of the will of the normative command and not by an arbitrary subjective judgment) and, in front of the actual reality, has been shown as the most effective. As issued by a competent authority, the decision will be considered, a priori, as the best decision, except if proved that other decision is sufficiently more favorable. It was noted that this assertion has harmony with the administrative role and the legal administrative regime. The exercise of the administrative role is, before anything, the common good promotion, the public interest. This implies in the assertion that the exercise of the prerogatives (Power) given to the administration are instrumentals and, therefore, may only be exercised for the achievement of the public interest set forth in its own judicial order (full submission to the principle of legality). Thereby, it is not granted to the legal scholar any freedom of action, as a public agent, in seek for another purpose but the public interest. Thus, the administration role is to always seek for the best solution for the concrete cases that are presented. Throughout the General Theory of Law elements description, it was sought to present means and procedures in order to seek the best decision (worth mentioning, hermeneutical notions of principles that provide an unitary and systemic comprehension of the judicial order, ratio of principles and rules, weighing judgment and enforcement of the proportionality and reasonableness principles
id PUC_SP-1_bf78843bcd20b4942fdb367c30b0db6c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/6644
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Cammarosano, Márciohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4243789T9Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes2016-04-26T20:23:21Z2014-12-012014-10-23Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes. Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa. 2014. 90 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2014.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6644The present study had as its scope, the delimitation of the legal concept of the Due Process of Law clause, in its substantial sense and its implication in the exercise of the administrative function. The mentioned clause is one of the oldest and intrinsic institutes of the Rule of Law. In its incipient form, the Due Process of Law clause represented one of the first methods to control the despotic power. Thenceforth, it was the skeleton for the rise of many others institutes that limits the State Power. From the formal procedural aspect procedural instruments (full defense and the right to appeal, motivation of the State decisions duty, among others), up to reaching the merits of the decision control (originally accepted as reasonableness judgment), this last one known as Substantial Due Process of Law. Occurs that this range of principles typically assigned to the Substantial Due Process of Law clause (reasonableness, proportionality, motivation) has express and specific legal provision in the normative text, demonstrating an emptying of its content in the Brazilian legal order. Nevertheless, it‟s a duty for the legal scholar to apply sense and unity to the judicial system. Within the national legal system, the mentioned principle reveals itself as a command to the law enforcer to seek the best ruling. The best ruling is the one, firstly, that promotes the public interest duty (therefore, preceded by a direct judgment of the will of the normative command and not by an arbitrary subjective judgment) and, in front of the actual reality, has been shown as the most effective. As issued by a competent authority, the decision will be considered, a priori, as the best decision, except if proved that other decision is sufficiently more favorable. It was noted that this assertion has harmony with the administrative role and the legal administrative regime. The exercise of the administrative role is, before anything, the common good promotion, the public interest. This implies in the assertion that the exercise of the prerogatives (Power) given to the administration are instrumentals and, therefore, may only be exercised for the achievement of the public interest set forth in its own judicial order (full submission to the principle of legality). Thereby, it is not granted to the legal scholar any freedom of action, as a public agent, in seek for another purpose but the public interest. Thus, the administration role is to always seek for the best solution for the concrete cases that are presented. Throughout the General Theory of Law elements description, it was sought to present means and procedures in order to seek the best decision (worth mentioning, hermeneutical notions of principles that provide an unitary and systemic comprehension of the judicial order, ratio of principles and rules, weighing judgment and enforcement of the proportionality and reasonableness principlesO presente trabalho teve como escopo a delimitação do conceito jurídico da cláusula do Devido Processo Legal em seu sentido substancial e sua implicação no âmbito do exercício da função administrativa. Referida cláusula é um dos institutos mais antigos e afetos ao Estado de Direito. Em sua forma embrionária, a cláusula do Devido Processo Legal representou uma das primeiras maneiras de controle do poder despótico. A partir daí, foi o arcabouço para o surgimento de tantos outros institutos limitadores do Poder Estatal. Seja pelo aspecto processual formal - ferramentas procedimentais (ampla defesa e contraditório, dever de motivação das decisões estatais, entre outros), até chegar ao controle de mérito da decisão (embrionariamente tido como juízo de razoabilidade), este ultimo, conhecido como Devido Processo Legal Substancial. Ocorre que, esta gama de princípios e postulados tipicamente atribuídos à cláusula do Devido Processo Legal substancial (razoabilidade, proporcionalidade, motivação) possui previsão legal expressa e específica no texto normativo, relevando um esvaziamento de seu conteúdo no âmbito do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Ainda assim, é obrigação do cientista do direito atribuir sentido e unicidade ao sistema jurídico. A cláusula do Devido Processo Legal é axiologicamente ligada ao controle do mérito das decisões estatais. No âmbito do ordenamento jurídico pátrio, tal princípio revela-se como um comando ao aplicador da norma para que este busque a prolação da melhor decisão. Melhor decisão é aquela que, em primeiro lugar, observa o dever de promoção do interesse público (portanto, precedida de um juízo objetivo da vontade do comando normativo, e não um juízo arbitrário subjetivo) e, diante da realidade fática, tenha se mostrado como a mais eficaz. Enquanto proferida por uma autoridade competente, a decisão será considerada, aprioristicamente, como a melhor decisão, salvo comprovado que outra solução seja suficientemente mais vantajosa. Constatou-se que esta afirmação tem plena harmonia com a função administrativa e regime jurídico-administrativo. O exercício da função administrativa é, antes de mais nada, a promoção do bem comum, do interesse público. Isto implica em afirmar que o exercício das prerrogativas (Poder) conferidas à administração são instrumentais e, portanto, só podem ser exercidos para prossecução do interesse público estabelecido no próprio ordenamento jurídico (submissão plena ao princípio da legalidade). Neste sentido, não é conferido ao operador do direito qualquer margem de ação, na qualidade de agente público, em busca de outra finalidade que não o interesse público. Sendo assim, é função da administração a busca plena sempre da melhor solução para os casos concretos que lhe são apresentadas. Por meio de descrição de elementos de Teoria Geral do Direito, buscou-se apresentar formas e procedimentos capa de que se busque a melhor decisão (vale destacar, noções hermenêuticas de postulados que conferem uma compreensão unitária e sistêmica do ordenamento jurídico, relação de princípios e regras, juízo de ponderação e aplicação dos postulados da proporcionalidade e razoabilidade)application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/15440/Guilherme%20Tadeu%20Pontes%20Birello.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBRFaculdade de DireitoCláusula do devido processo legal substancialFunção administrativaAto administrativoPostulado da proporcionalidadeSubstantial Due Process of Law clauseAdministrative roleAdministrative actPrinciple of proportionalityCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITODevido processo legal substancial e a função administrativainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTGuilherme Tadeu Pontes Birello.pdf.txtGuilherme Tadeu Pontes Birello.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain215555https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6644/3/Guilherme%20Tadeu%20Pontes%20Birello.pdf.txt17a75c20e6f2e653af08a73b42734627MD53ORIGINALGuilherme Tadeu Pontes Birello.pdfapplication/pdf675120https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6644/1/Guilherme%20Tadeu%20Pontes%20Birello.pdfb484a013694adb12dc781cd4a15202b8MD51THUMBNAILGuilherme Tadeu Pontes Birello.pdf.jpgGuilherme Tadeu Pontes Birello.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1953https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6644/2/Guilherme%20Tadeu%20Pontes%20Birello.pdf.jpg839f35a4aa7ea8d7aeea75ae36d15f4aMD52handle/66442022-08-22 18:11:52.641oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/6644Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:52Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa
title Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa
spellingShingle Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa
Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes
Cláusula do devido processo legal substancial
Função administrativa
Ato administrativo
Postulado da proporcionalidade
Substantial Due Process of Law clause
Administrative role
Administrative act
Principle of proportionality
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa
title_full Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa
title_fullStr Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa
title_full_unstemmed Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa
title_sort Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa
author Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes
author_facet Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Cammarosano, Márcio
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4243789T9
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes
contributor_str_mv Cammarosano, Márcio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cláusula do devido processo legal substancial
Função administrativa
Ato administrativo
Postulado da proporcionalidade
topic Cláusula do devido processo legal substancial
Função administrativa
Ato administrativo
Postulado da proporcionalidade
Substantial Due Process of Law clause
Administrative role
Administrative act
Principle of proportionality
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Substantial Due Process of Law clause
Administrative role
Administrative act
Principle of proportionality
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description The present study had as its scope, the delimitation of the legal concept of the Due Process of Law clause, in its substantial sense and its implication in the exercise of the administrative function. The mentioned clause is one of the oldest and intrinsic institutes of the Rule of Law. In its incipient form, the Due Process of Law clause represented one of the first methods to control the despotic power. Thenceforth, it was the skeleton for the rise of many others institutes that limits the State Power. From the formal procedural aspect procedural instruments (full defense and the right to appeal, motivation of the State decisions duty, among others), up to reaching the merits of the decision control (originally accepted as reasonableness judgment), this last one known as Substantial Due Process of Law. Occurs that this range of principles typically assigned to the Substantial Due Process of Law clause (reasonableness, proportionality, motivation) has express and specific legal provision in the normative text, demonstrating an emptying of its content in the Brazilian legal order. Nevertheless, it‟s a duty for the legal scholar to apply sense and unity to the judicial system. Within the national legal system, the mentioned principle reveals itself as a command to the law enforcer to seek the best ruling. The best ruling is the one, firstly, that promotes the public interest duty (therefore, preceded by a direct judgment of the will of the normative command and not by an arbitrary subjective judgment) and, in front of the actual reality, has been shown as the most effective. As issued by a competent authority, the decision will be considered, a priori, as the best decision, except if proved that other decision is sufficiently more favorable. It was noted that this assertion has harmony with the administrative role and the legal administrative regime. The exercise of the administrative role is, before anything, the common good promotion, the public interest. This implies in the assertion that the exercise of the prerogatives (Power) given to the administration are instrumentals and, therefore, may only be exercised for the achievement of the public interest set forth in its own judicial order (full submission to the principle of legality). Thereby, it is not granted to the legal scholar any freedom of action, as a public agent, in seek for another purpose but the public interest. Thus, the administration role is to always seek for the best solution for the concrete cases that are presented. Throughout the General Theory of Law elements description, it was sought to present means and procedures in order to seek the best decision (worth mentioning, hermeneutical notions of principles that provide an unitary and systemic comprehension of the judicial order, ratio of principles and rules, weighing judgment and enforcement of the proportionality and reasonableness principles
publishDate 2014
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-10-23
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-04-26T20:23:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes. Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa. 2014. 90 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6644
identifier_str_mv Birello, Guilherme Tadeu Pontes. Devido processo legal substancial e a função administrativa. 2014. 90 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2014.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6644
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6644/3/Guilherme%20Tadeu%20Pontes%20Birello.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6644/1/Guilherme%20Tadeu%20Pontes%20Birello.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6644/2/Guilherme%20Tadeu%20Pontes%20Birello.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 17a75c20e6f2e653af08a73b42734627
b484a013694adb12dc781cd4a15202b8
839f35a4aa7ea8d7aeea75ae36d15f4a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809277838593884160