Natureza jurídica das Astreintes

• Autor(a) principal: Romeiro, José Luiz de Assis
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/26576
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Astreinte; Multa; Obrigação; Coercitiva; Indenizatória; Jurisprudência; “Astreinte”; Penalty; Obligation; Coercive; Indemnity; Former court decisions

It is true that the mechanism of a penalty is intended to coerce the defendant to comply a certain obligation. However, in the practice, there are some situations in which the obligation is no longer interesting, due to the impossibility to fulfill it, and the penalty becomes more interesting to the Plaintiff. Thereby, the former court decisions evolving towards relativizing the execution of the full value of the “astreinte” when the obligation execution is fulfilled, given that the objective of the penalty was fulfilled, which was to enforce the obligation, we bring the debate when the execution of the “astreinte” seems like an indemnity nature, due to the impossibility of fulfilling the affirmative covenant or a negative covenant. So, we’ll going to talk about on this undergraduate thesis, the nature at the beginning of the comminatory penalty as a coercive measure, and the cases that the penalty can assume the indemnity nature and the current position of the Superior Court of Justice for controversial issues about the “astreinte” theme