Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5536
Resumo: The present work considers to study the phenomena of the nepotism and the patrimonialism in the scope of the Brazilian Public Administration and the way it runs its prohibition and repression in the context of our effective jurisprudence, especially, in face of the constitutional principle of the sensible new morality and the reach acquired for the constitutional jurisdiction in the plan of the legal-constitutional system introduced by the Federal Constitution of 1988. The concepts of nepotism and patrimonial State or simply patrimonialism will be analyzed in such a way under the description-sociological prism how much under a purely legalnormative approach. One in this manner searches to articulate in an only plan of analysis the perspective call of the participant (legal-normative approach) and the perspective of the observer (description-sociological approach). In what it refers to the legal-normative appreciation of the nepotism, our analysis aimed at since the meaning contemporary of the proper constitutional jurisdiction in our legal system, passing for the eventual collision of the rule that prohibition the available nepotism with other principles constitutional and procedural ways for its repression and has controlled, until the study and the minute reflection on its normative concept and its modalities, the available parameters legal-argumentative for the application of the prohibition rule and its limits and, finally, resistences, contradictions and ambiguities you observed in the last effort undertaken for the institutions for controlling the nepotism and other modalities of patrimonialism in the state scope - by means of the edition of the Resolution nº 07/05 of the CNJ and Binding the Abridgement nº 13 of the STF. The reflection on the constitutional normativeness of principles such as of the morality (main axle of our legal-normative analysis) and of the impersonality will be given in the scope of a theoretical field however in constitution, but usually identify in the academic debate for pos-positivism - and is recognized in the workmanship of authors as RONALD DWORKIN, ROBERT ALEXY, EDUARDO GARCI'A DE ENTERRÍA and J. J. GOMES CANOTILHO. To this referencial theoretician-metodological we add as structurant line of our reflection, with intention to provide to an analysis of first the legal system of and second order (observing/participant) the concept of legal system in the form that printed it NIKLAS LUHMANN - with some exceptions in what it says respect to its conception on the legitimation of the Right. It was still opted to a methodological framing that in allowed them to base on a historical perspective and politics the dynamics of the patrimonial State, and to collate it with a theory of the social evolution and the moral development in the individual and institutional scope. An interpretation based in a renewed conception of the historical materialism, in landmarks presented for JÜRGEN HABERMAS was adopted here then. How much to the waited results, we intend to excite, in first place, a reflection on the historical beddings and politicians of the patrimonialism and its manifestation in the nepotism form. In second, a change of attitude of the legal operators in relation to this subject. Finally, in we strengthen to supply them elements of legal-normative nature with potential to clarify and to contribute the dogmatic perfectioning of this substance, assisting in some way in the search for a society that is, in fact, free, joust and of solidarity
id PUC_SP-1_e0406e9d4098fc08e3de9e8bf24b58d9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/5536
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Beznos, Clovishttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4223075D6http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784499Z4Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de2016-04-26T20:20:01Z2011-05-232011-05-11Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de. Nepotism and patrimonial State in Brazil in face of the constitutional principle of the morality. 2011. 362 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2011.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5536The present work considers to study the phenomena of the nepotism and the patrimonialism in the scope of the Brazilian Public Administration and the way it runs its prohibition and repression in the context of our effective jurisprudence, especially, in face of the constitutional principle of the sensible new morality and the reach acquired for the constitutional jurisdiction in the plan of the legal-constitutional system introduced by the Federal Constitution of 1988. The concepts of nepotism and patrimonial State or simply patrimonialism will be analyzed in such a way under the description-sociological prism how much under a purely legalnormative approach. One in this manner searches to articulate in an only plan of analysis the perspective call of the participant (legal-normative approach) and the perspective of the observer (description-sociological approach). In what it refers to the legal-normative appreciation of the nepotism, our analysis aimed at since the meaning contemporary of the proper constitutional jurisdiction in our legal system, passing for the eventual collision of the rule that prohibition the available nepotism with other principles constitutional and procedural ways for its repression and has controlled, until the study and the minute reflection on its normative concept and its modalities, the available parameters legal-argumentative for the application of the prohibition rule and its limits and, finally, resistences, contradictions and ambiguities you observed in the last effort undertaken for the institutions for controlling the nepotism and other modalities of patrimonialism in the state scope - by means of the edition of the Resolution nº 07/05 of the CNJ and Binding the Abridgement nº 13 of the STF. The reflection on the constitutional normativeness of principles such as of the morality (main axle of our legal-normative analysis) and of the impersonality will be given in the scope of a theoretical field however in constitution, but usually identify in the academic debate for pos-positivism - and is recognized in the workmanship of authors as RONALD DWORKIN, ROBERT ALEXY, EDUARDO GARCI'A DE ENTERRÍA and J. J. GOMES CANOTILHO. To this referencial theoretician-metodological we add as structurant line of our reflection, with intention to provide to an analysis of first the legal system of and second order (observing/participant) the concept of legal system in the form that printed it NIKLAS LUHMANN - with some exceptions in what it says respect to its conception on the legitimation of the Right. It was still opted to a methodological framing that in allowed them to base on a historical perspective and politics the dynamics of the patrimonial State, and to collate it with a theory of the social evolution and the moral development in the individual and institutional scope. An interpretation based in a renewed conception of the historical materialism, in landmarks presented for JÜRGEN HABERMAS was adopted here then. How much to the waited results, we intend to excite, in first place, a reflection on the historical beddings and politicians of the patrimonialism and its manifestation in the nepotism form. In second, a change of attitude of the legal operators in relation to this subject. Finally, in we strengthen to supply them elements of legal-normative nature with potential to clarify and to contribute the dogmatic perfectioning of this substance, assisting in some way in the search for a society that is, in fact, free, joust and of solidarityO presente trabalho se propõe a estudar os fenômenos do nepotismo e do patrimonialismo no âmbito da Administração Pública brasileira e o modo como se dá a sua vedação e repressão no contexto de nossa ordem jurídica vigente, especialmente, em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade e do novo sentido e alcance adquirido pela jurisdição constitucional no plano do sistema jurídico-constitucional introduzido pela Constituição Federal de 1988. Os conceitos de nepotismo e de Estado patrimonial ou simplesmente patrimonialismo serão analisados tanto sob o prisma histórico-sociológico quanto sob um enfoque puramente jurídico-normativo. Busca-se desse modo articular em um único plano de análise a chamada perspectiva do participante (enfoque jurídico-normativo) e a perspectiva do observador (enfoque histórico-sociológico). No que tange à apreciação jurídico-normativa do nepotismo, nossa análise visou desde o significado contemporâneo da própria jurisdição constitucional em nosso sistema jurídico, passando pela eventual colisão da regra que veda o nepotismo com outros princípios constitucionais e os meios processuais disponíveis para a sua repressão e controle, até o estudo e a reflexão minuciosa sobre seu conceito normativo e suas modalidades, os parâmetros jurídico-argumentativos disponíveis para a aplicação da regra de vedação e seus limites e, por fim, resistências, contradições e ambiguidades observáveis no último esforço empreendido pelas instituições para se controlar o nepotismo e outras modalidades de patrimonialismo no âmbito estatal - por meio da edição da Resolução nº 07/05 do CNJ e da Súmula Vinculante nº 13 do STF. A reflexão sobre a normatividade de princípios constitucionais tais como os da moralidade (eixo principal de nossa análise jurídico-normativa) e da impessoalidade se darão no âmbito de um campo teórico ora em constituição, mas que costuma se identificar no debate acadêmico por pós-positivismo e é reconhecido na obra de autores como RONALD DWORKIN, ROBERT ALEXY, EDUARDO GARCIA DE ENTERRÍA e J. J. GOMES CANOTILHO. A esse referencial teórico-metodológico acrescentamos como linha estruturante de nossa reflexão, com o intuito de proporcionar uma análise do sistema jurídico de primeira e segunda ordem (observador/participante) o conceito de sistema jurídico na forma que lhe imprimiu NIKLAS LUHMANN com algumas ressalvas no que diz respeito à sua concepção sobre a legitimação do Direito. Optou-se ainda por um enquadramento metodológico que nos permitisse fundamentar em uma perspectiva histórica e política a dinâmica do Estado patrimonial, e confrontá-la com uma teoria da evolução social e do desenvolvimento moral no âmbito individual e institucional. Adotou-se então aqui uma interpretação pautada em uma concepção renovada do materialismo histórico, nos marcos apresentados por JÜRGEN HABERMAS. Quanto aos resultados esperados, intentamos suscitar, em primeiro lugar, uma reflexão sobre os fundamentos históricos e políticos do patrimonialismo e sua manifestação na forma de nepotismo. Em segundo, uma mudança de atitude dos operadores jurídicos em relação a esse tema. E por fim, nos esforçamos para fornecer elementos de natureza jurídico-normativa com potencial para esclarecer e contribuir para o aperfeiçoamento dogmático dessa matéria, auxiliando de algum modo na busca por uma sociedade que seja, de fato, livre, justa e solidáriaapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/14351/Jose%20Carlos%20Evangelista%20de%20Araujo.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBRFaculdade de DireitoNepotismoPatrimonialismoPrincípio da moralidadeJurisdição constitucionalGarantias públicas fundamentaisNepotismPatrimonialismPrinciple of the moralityConstitutional jurisdictionBasic public guaranteesCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVONepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidadeNepotism and patrimonial State in Brazil in face of the constitutional principle of the moralityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTJose Carlos Evangelista de Araujo.pdf.txtJose Carlos Evangelista de Araujo.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain1036291https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/5536/3/Jose%20Carlos%20Evangelista%20de%20Araujo.pdf.txte6512e31fc28781eeb02157931bc3187MD53ORIGINALJose Carlos Evangelista de Araujo.pdfapplication/pdf2199221https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/5536/1/Jose%20Carlos%20Evangelista%20de%20Araujo.pdf13e4f2c5e9aa02e941c6188014bc0b65MD51THUMBNAILJose Carlos Evangelista de Araujo.pdf.jpgJose Carlos Evangelista de Araujo.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3194https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/5536/2/Jose%20Carlos%20Evangelista%20de%20Araujo.pdf.jpgbe7b7037deabad396abd363e88eda268MD52handle/55362022-08-22 21:12:08.835oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/5536Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-23T00:12:08Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Nepotism and patrimonial State in Brazil in face of the constitutional principle of the morality
title Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade
spellingShingle Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade
Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de
Nepotismo
Patrimonialismo
Princípio da moralidade
Jurisdição constitucional
Garantias públicas fundamentais
Nepotism
Patrimonialism
Principle of the morality
Constitutional jurisdiction
Basic public guarantees
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO
title_short Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade
title_full Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade
title_fullStr Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade
title_full_unstemmed Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade
title_sort Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade
author Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de
author_facet Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Beznos, Clovis
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4223075D6
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784499Z4
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de
contributor_str_mv Beznos, Clovis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nepotismo
Patrimonialismo
Princípio da moralidade
Jurisdição constitucional
Garantias públicas fundamentais
topic Nepotismo
Patrimonialismo
Princípio da moralidade
Jurisdição constitucional
Garantias públicas fundamentais
Nepotism
Patrimonialism
Principle of the morality
Constitutional jurisdiction
Basic public guarantees
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Nepotism
Patrimonialism
Principle of the morality
Constitutional jurisdiction
Basic public guarantees
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO
description The present work considers to study the phenomena of the nepotism and the patrimonialism in the scope of the Brazilian Public Administration and the way it runs its prohibition and repression in the context of our effective jurisprudence, especially, in face of the constitutional principle of the sensible new morality and the reach acquired for the constitutional jurisdiction in the plan of the legal-constitutional system introduced by the Federal Constitution of 1988. The concepts of nepotism and patrimonial State or simply patrimonialism will be analyzed in such a way under the description-sociological prism how much under a purely legalnormative approach. One in this manner searches to articulate in an only plan of analysis the perspective call of the participant (legal-normative approach) and the perspective of the observer (description-sociological approach). In what it refers to the legal-normative appreciation of the nepotism, our analysis aimed at since the meaning contemporary of the proper constitutional jurisdiction in our legal system, passing for the eventual collision of the rule that prohibition the available nepotism with other principles constitutional and procedural ways for its repression and has controlled, until the study and the minute reflection on its normative concept and its modalities, the available parameters legal-argumentative for the application of the prohibition rule and its limits and, finally, resistences, contradictions and ambiguities you observed in the last effort undertaken for the institutions for controlling the nepotism and other modalities of patrimonialism in the state scope - by means of the edition of the Resolution nº 07/05 of the CNJ and Binding the Abridgement nº 13 of the STF. The reflection on the constitutional normativeness of principles such as of the morality (main axle of our legal-normative analysis) and of the impersonality will be given in the scope of a theoretical field however in constitution, but usually identify in the academic debate for pos-positivism - and is recognized in the workmanship of authors as RONALD DWORKIN, ROBERT ALEXY, EDUARDO GARCI'A DE ENTERRÍA and J. J. GOMES CANOTILHO. To this referencial theoretician-metodological we add as structurant line of our reflection, with intention to provide to an analysis of first the legal system of and second order (observing/participant) the concept of legal system in the form that printed it NIKLAS LUHMANN - with some exceptions in what it says respect to its conception on the legitimation of the Right. It was still opted to a methodological framing that in allowed them to base on a historical perspective and politics the dynamics of the patrimonial State, and to collate it with a theory of the social evolution and the moral development in the individual and institutional scope. An interpretation based in a renewed conception of the historical materialism, in landmarks presented for JÜRGEN HABERMAS was adopted here then. How much to the waited results, we intend to excite, in first place, a reflection on the historical beddings and politicians of the patrimonialism and its manifestation in the nepotism form. In second, a change of attitude of the legal operators in relation to this subject. Finally, in we strengthen to supply them elements of legal-normative nature with potential to clarify and to contribute the dogmatic perfectioning of this substance, assisting in some way in the search for a society that is, in fact, free, joust and of solidarity
publishDate 2011
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2011-05-23
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2011-05-11
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-04-26T20:20:01Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de. Nepotism and patrimonial State in Brazil in face of the constitutional principle of the morality. 2011. 362 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2011.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5536
identifier_str_mv Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de. Nepotism and patrimonial State in Brazil in face of the constitutional principle of the morality. 2011. 362 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2011.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5536
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/5536/3/Jose%20Carlos%20Evangelista%20de%20Araujo.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/5536/1/Jose%20Carlos%20Evangelista%20de%20Araujo.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/5536/2/Jose%20Carlos%20Evangelista%20de%20Araujo.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e6512e31fc28781eeb02157931bc3187
13e4f2c5e9aa02e941c6188014bc0b65
be7b7037deabad396abd363e88eda268
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809277772397281280