The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosário, Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Hogemann, Julia, Carlos Nunez, Jose, Vallejo, Guillermo, Cunha, Jennifer, Rodriguez, Celestino, Fuentes, Sonia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66865
Resumo: Students' writing constitutes a topic of major concern due to its importance in school and in daily life. To mitigate students' writing problems, school-based interventions have been implemented in the past, but there is still a need to examine the effectiveness of different types of writing interventions that use robust design methodologies. Hence, the present study followed a longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled design using a multilevel modeling analysis with 370 fourth-grade students (nested in 20 classes). The classes were randomly assigned to four conditions: one comparison group and three writing types of writing interventions (i.e., week-journals, Self-Regulation Strategy Development (SRSD) instruction and SRSD plus Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) program using a story-tool), with five classes participating in each condition. Data supports our hypothesis by showing differences between the treatment groups in students' writing quality over time. Globally, the improvement of students' writing quality throughout time is related to the level of specialization of the writing interventions implemented. This is an important finding with strong implications for educational practice. Week-journals and writing activities can be easily implemented in classrooms and provides an opportunity to promote students' writing quality. Still, students who participated in the instructional programs (i.e., SRSD and SRSD plus story-tool) exhibited higher writing quality than the students who wrote week-journals. Current data did not find statistical significant differences between results from the two instructional writing tools.
id RCAP_00b1d205fc24cc3d4f1f9fa4bda8143b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/66865
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing qualityScience & TechnologyStudents' writing constitutes a topic of major concern due to its importance in school and in daily life. To mitigate students' writing problems, school-based interventions have been implemented in the past, but there is still a need to examine the effectiveness of different types of writing interventions that use robust design methodologies. Hence, the present study followed a longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled design using a multilevel modeling analysis with 370 fourth-grade students (nested in 20 classes). The classes were randomly assigned to four conditions: one comparison group and three writing types of writing interventions (i.e., week-journals, Self-Regulation Strategy Development (SRSD) instruction and SRSD plus Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) program using a story-tool), with five classes participating in each condition. Data supports our hypothesis by showing differences between the treatment groups in students' writing quality over time. Globally, the improvement of students' writing quality throughout time is related to the level of specialization of the writing interventions implemented. This is an important finding with strong implications for educational practice. Week-journals and writing activities can be easily implemented in classrooms and provides an opportunity to promote students' writing quality. Still, students who participated in the instructional programs (i.e., SRSD and SRSD plus story-tool) exhibited higher writing quality than the students who wrote week-journals. Current data did not find statistical significant differences between results from the two instructional writing tools.This study was conducted at the Psychology Research Centre, University of Minho. PR, JH and JC were supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, UID/PSI/01662/2013. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Public Library of ScienceUniversidade do MinhoRosário, PedroHogemann, JuliaCarlos Nunez, JoseVallejo, GuillermoCunha, JenniferRodriguez, CelestinoFuentes, Sonia20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/66865engRosário, P.; Högemann, J.; Núñez, J. C.; Vallejo, G.; Cunha, J.; Rodríguez, C.; et al. (2019). The impact of three types of writing intervention on students’ writing quality. PLoSONE 14 (7): e0218099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.02180991932-620310.1371/journal.pone.021809931318868https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218099info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:41:03Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/66865Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:37:56.759157Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality
title The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality
spellingShingle The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality
Rosário, Pedro
Science & Technology
title_short The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality
title_full The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality
title_fullStr The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality
title_full_unstemmed The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality
title_sort The impact of three types of writing intervention on students' writing quality
author Rosário, Pedro
author_facet Rosário, Pedro
Hogemann, Julia
Carlos Nunez, Jose
Vallejo, Guillermo
Cunha, Jennifer
Rodriguez, Celestino
Fuentes, Sonia
author_role author
author2 Hogemann, Julia
Carlos Nunez, Jose
Vallejo, Guillermo
Cunha, Jennifer
Rodriguez, Celestino
Fuentes, Sonia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosário, Pedro
Hogemann, Julia
Carlos Nunez, Jose
Vallejo, Guillermo
Cunha, Jennifer
Rodriguez, Celestino
Fuentes, Sonia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Science & Technology
topic Science & Technology
description Students' writing constitutes a topic of major concern due to its importance in school and in daily life. To mitigate students' writing problems, school-based interventions have been implemented in the past, but there is still a need to examine the effectiveness of different types of writing interventions that use robust design methodologies. Hence, the present study followed a longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled design using a multilevel modeling analysis with 370 fourth-grade students (nested in 20 classes). The classes were randomly assigned to four conditions: one comparison group and three writing types of writing interventions (i.e., week-journals, Self-Regulation Strategy Development (SRSD) instruction and SRSD plus Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) program using a story-tool), with five classes participating in each condition. Data supports our hypothesis by showing differences between the treatment groups in students' writing quality over time. Globally, the improvement of students' writing quality throughout time is related to the level of specialization of the writing interventions implemented. This is an important finding with strong implications for educational practice. Week-journals and writing activities can be easily implemented in classrooms and provides an opportunity to promote students' writing quality. Still, students who participated in the instructional programs (i.e., SRSD and SRSD plus story-tool) exhibited higher writing quality than the students who wrote week-journals. Current data did not find statistical significant differences between results from the two instructional writing tools.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66865
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66865
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Rosário, P.; Högemann, J.; Núñez, J. C.; Vallejo, G.; Cunha, J.; Rodríguez, C.; et al. (2019). The impact of three types of writing intervention on students’ writing quality. PLoSONE 14 (7): e0218099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218099
1932-6203
10.1371/journal.pone.0218099
31318868
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218099
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132914954272768