Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/5411 |
Resumo: | Abstract: In this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing one’s own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants’ need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim. |
id |
RCAP_08eef4fa41ad772339956058f15e9519 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/5411 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacyAffect as informationPersuasionRational-experiential personalitiesAfeto como informaçãoPersuasãoPersonalidade racional e experiencialAbstract: In this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing one’s own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants’ need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim.Resumo: Este artigo aborda a relação entre a crença de que os sentimentos nos informam sobre a validade de uma reivindicação/afirmação e a crença da eficácia de uma estratégia persuasiva sobre o próprio. O estudo apresentado pediu aos participantes que selecionassem de um conjunto de características de um contexto persuasivo as que poderiam ter capacidade de os persuadir. A análise dos resultados demostra que as seleções dos participantes agruparam as características persuasivas em características de foro cognitivo e características de foro afetivo ou experiencial. Medidas individuais quer de necessidade de cognição quer de fé na intuição não explicaram a tendência dos participantes em escolher mais um tipo de características do que outro. Esta seleção parece, antes, ser determinada pela crença manifestada pelos participantes de que os nossos sentimentos e afetos nos informam sobre a validade ou qualidade da reivindicação/afirmação persuasiva.FCT – Fundação Portuguesa de Ciência e Tecnologia (project PTDC/PSIPCO/ 121925/2010)Edições ISPARepositório do ISPAGarcia-Marques, TeresaLoureiro, Filipe2017-04-22T09:32:48Z2016-062016-06-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/5411engGarcia-Marques, T., & Loureiro, F. (2016). Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy. Análise Psicológica, 34(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.10980870-823110.14417/ap.1098info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-03T02:15:34Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/5411Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:23:15.818527Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
spellingShingle |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy Garcia-Marques, Teresa Affect as information Persuasion Rational-experiential personalities Afeto como informação Persuasão Personalidade racional e experiencial |
title_short |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_full |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_fullStr |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_sort |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
author |
Garcia-Marques, Teresa |
author_facet |
Garcia-Marques, Teresa Loureiro, Filipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Loureiro, Filipe |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do ISPA |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia-Marques, Teresa Loureiro, Filipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Affect as information Persuasion Rational-experiential personalities Afeto como informação Persuasão Personalidade racional e experiencial |
topic |
Affect as information Persuasion Rational-experiential personalities Afeto como informação Persuasão Personalidade racional e experiencial |
description |
Abstract: In this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing one’s own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants’ need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06 2016-06-01T00:00:00Z 2017-04-22T09:32:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/5411 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/5411 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Garcia-Marques, T., & Loureiro, F. (2016). Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy. Análise Psicológica, 34(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1098 0870-8231 10.14417/ap.1098 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edições ISPA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edições ISPA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130093865402368 |