Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312016000100006 |
Resumo: | In this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing ones own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim. |
id |
RCAP_b256cdf6efec3c5f195c747e0cbf1a44 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0870-82312016000100006 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacyAffect as informationPersuasionRational-experiential personalitiesIn this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing ones own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim.ISPA-Instituto Universitário2016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312016000100006Análise Psicológica v.34 n.1 2016reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312016000100006Garcia-Marques,TeresaLoureiro,Filipeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:00:44Zoai:scielo:S0870-82312016000100006Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:16:29.832282Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
spellingShingle |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy Garcia-Marques,Teresa Affect as information Persuasion Rational-experiential personalities |
title_short |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_full |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_fullStr |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_sort |
Dispositional beliefs regarding affect as information determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
author |
Garcia-Marques,Teresa |
author_facet |
Garcia-Marques,Teresa Loureiro,Filipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Loureiro,Filipe |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia-Marques,Teresa Loureiro,Filipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Affect as information Persuasion Rational-experiential personalities |
topic |
Affect as information Persuasion Rational-experiential personalities |
description |
In this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing ones own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312016000100006 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312016000100006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0870-82312016000100006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA-Instituto Universitário |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA-Instituto Universitário |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise Psicológica v.34 n.1 2016 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137261720174592 |