The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/4832 |
Resumo: | In recent years, Knowledge Management (KM) has assumed great importance in the literature on business and management. However, we still have so little understanding of the human issues in KM processes. Thus, this research aims to contribute to analysing the importance of Organizational Commitment (OC) to KM. First, we used the Cardoso (2003) Knowledge Management Questionnaire (QGC) that embraces all organizational activities around knowledge processes and distinguishes four dimensions of KM. Secondly we applied the Quijano, Masip, Navarro and Aubert (1997) questionnaire (ASH-ICI) that distinguishes two types of commitment (personal and instrumental) into four dimensions. These two questionnaires were applied with 300 employees in the Portuguese industrial ceramics sector. Through multiple regression analysis we found that levels of organizational commitment are statistically important to KM dimensions. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that personal commitment is more important than need commitment. These results are discussed and Organizational Behaviour specialists and Work and Organizational psychologists are challenged to assume more responsibility and an active role in KM studies and practices and to explore human issues in this field. |
id |
RCAP_0bcf5c6c2e733f72e670a9fca0a9b154 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/4832 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge managementKnowledge managementOrganizational commitmentGestão do conhecimentoComprometimento organizacionalIn recent years, Knowledge Management (KM) has assumed great importance in the literature on business and management. However, we still have so little understanding of the human issues in KM processes. Thus, this research aims to contribute to analysing the importance of Organizational Commitment (OC) to KM. First, we used the Cardoso (2003) Knowledge Management Questionnaire (QGC) that embraces all organizational activities around knowledge processes and distinguishes four dimensions of KM. Secondly we applied the Quijano, Masip, Navarro and Aubert (1997) questionnaire (ASH-ICI) that distinguishes two types of commitment (personal and instrumental) into four dimensions. These two questionnaires were applied with 300 employees in the Portuguese industrial ceramics sector. Through multiple regression analysis we found that levels of organizational commitment are statistically important to KM dimensions. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that personal commitment is more important than need commitment. These results are discussed and Organizational Behaviour specialists and Work and Organizational psychologists are challenged to assume more responsibility and an active role in KM studies and practices and to explore human issues in this field.Nos últimos anos, a Gestão do Conhecimento (GC) tem assumido uma grande relevância na literatura da gestão e dos negócios. Contudo, persiste a escassa compreensão dos aspectos humanos nos processos de GC. Deste modo, esta investigação procura contribuir para a análise da importância do Comprometimento Organizacional (CO) para a GC. Em primeiro lugar, utilizámos o Questionário de Gestão do Conhecimento (QGC) de Cardoso (2003) que compreende em si todas as actividades organizacionais constituintes dos processos do conhecimento e que distingue quatro dimensões da GC. Em segundo lugar, aplicámos o questionário (ASH-ICI) de Quijano, Masip, Navarro e Aubert (1997) que distingue dois tipos de comprometimento (pessoal e instrumental) em quatro dimensões. Estes dois questionários foram aplicados a 300 colaboradores do sector industrial cerâmico português. Através da análise de regressão múltipla, verificámos que os níveis de comprometimento organizacional são estatisticamente importantes para as dimensões da GC. Para além disso, a nossa análise indica que o comprometimento pessoal é mais importante do que o comprometimento de necessidade. Estes resultados são discutidos e os especialistas do Comportamento Organizacional e psicólogos do Trabalho e das Organizações são desafiados a assumir uma maior responsabilidade e um papel mais activo nos estudos e práticas da GC, bem como a explorar os aspectos humanos neste campo.Instituto Superior de Psicologia AplicadaRepositório do ISPARocha, Felipe de SequeiraCardoso, LeonorTordera, Nuria2016-07-21T18:34:23Z2008-01-01T00:00:00Z2008-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/4832engComportamento Organizacional e Gestão, 14, 211-2320872-9662info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T16:40:34Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/4832Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:22:40.773923Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management |
title |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management |
spellingShingle |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management Rocha, Felipe de Sequeira Knowledge management Organizational commitment Gestão do conhecimento Comprometimento organizacional |
title_short |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management |
title_full |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management |
title_fullStr |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management |
title_full_unstemmed |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management |
title_sort |
The importance of organizational commitment to knowledge management |
author |
Rocha, Felipe de Sequeira |
author_facet |
Rocha, Felipe de Sequeira Cardoso, Leonor Tordera, Nuria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cardoso, Leonor Tordera, Nuria |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do ISPA |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Felipe de Sequeira Cardoso, Leonor Tordera, Nuria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Knowledge management Organizational commitment Gestão do conhecimento Comprometimento organizacional |
topic |
Knowledge management Organizational commitment Gestão do conhecimento Comprometimento organizacional |
description |
In recent years, Knowledge Management (KM) has assumed great importance in the literature on business and management. However, we still have so little understanding of the human issues in KM processes. Thus, this research aims to contribute to analysing the importance of Organizational Commitment (OC) to KM. First, we used the Cardoso (2003) Knowledge Management Questionnaire (QGC) that embraces all organizational activities around knowledge processes and distinguishes four dimensions of KM. Secondly we applied the Quijano, Masip, Navarro and Aubert (1997) questionnaire (ASH-ICI) that distinguishes two types of commitment (personal and instrumental) into four dimensions. These two questionnaires were applied with 300 employees in the Portuguese industrial ceramics sector. Through multiple regression analysis we found that levels of organizational commitment are statistically important to KM dimensions. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that personal commitment is more important than need commitment. These results are discussed and Organizational Behaviour specialists and Work and Organizational psychologists are challenged to assume more responsibility and an active role in KM studies and practices and to explore human issues in this field. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z 2008-01-01T00:00:00Z 2016-07-21T18:34:23Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/4832 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/4832 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão, 14, 211-232 0872-9662 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130087215333376 |