How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Fátima
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Reis, Pedro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10284/7055
Resumo: The increasing importance of online education has resulted in attempts to make these teaching/learning means more reliable, valid and feasible in order to avoid the criticisms that are often directed that any e-learning course, above all its assessment process within teaching and learning contexts. Given the potential of online education to higher education, our question is whether, and in what ways, different types of assessments might have an impact on the view faculty and learners have of the assessment methods used in the Virtual University of Fernando Pessoa University (UFP-UV) in Porto, Portugal, in relation to their reliability, feasibility and validity. In this paper we will revisit some of the approaches involved in any assessment process, with particular emphasis on online assessment. The case study carried out sought to investigate the extent to which faculty and learners consider the assessment used in the curricular unit of the e-learning course to be feasible, valid and reliable. These impressions were gauged in two different questionnaires (one for the teachers and another for the learners) in which respondents assigned graded qualitative responses to certain statements, and, in the observation section of the questionnaire, they could provide qualitative comments on the question, thus allowing both a quantitative and a qualitative analysis of the data. The results demonstrate that the virtual classroom is, for both groups in this case study, the mechanism that shows the most reliability whether the virtual classroom acts as a ‘real’ classroom in which both parties are 'face-to-face' via audiovisual means or only the audio means of the virtual classroom is used to question the learner orally.
id RCAP_3e4289d81f77c6d35fc91a0e1d7b9039
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.ufp.pt:10284/7055
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling How learners and faculty rate online assessment methodsOnline assessmente-LearningReliabilityThe increasing importance of online education has resulted in attempts to make these teaching/learning means more reliable, valid and feasible in order to avoid the criticisms that are often directed that any e-learning course, above all its assessment process within teaching and learning contexts. Given the potential of online education to higher education, our question is whether, and in what ways, different types of assessments might have an impact on the view faculty and learners have of the assessment methods used in the Virtual University of Fernando Pessoa University (UFP-UV) in Porto, Portugal, in relation to their reliability, feasibility and validity. In this paper we will revisit some of the approaches involved in any assessment process, with particular emphasis on online assessment. The case study carried out sought to investigate the extent to which faculty and learners consider the assessment used in the curricular unit of the e-learning course to be feasible, valid and reliable. These impressions were gauged in two different questionnaires (one for the teachers and another for the learners) in which respondents assigned graded qualitative responses to certain statements, and, in the observation section of the questionnaire, they could provide qualitative comments on the question, thus allowing both a quantitative and a qualitative analysis of the data. The results demonstrate that the virtual classroom is, for both groups in this case study, the mechanism that shows the most reliability whether the virtual classroom acts as a ‘real’ classroom in which both parties are 'face-to-face' via audiovisual means or only the audio means of the virtual classroom is used to question the learner orally.IATEDRepositório Institucional da Universidade Fernando PessoaSilva, FátimaReis, Pedro2018-11-27T11:25:12Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10284/7055engSilva, Fátima & Reis, Pedro (2017) How Learners and Faculty Rate Online Assessment Methods. In: ICERI2017 Proceedings - 10th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain. (ISBN: 978-84-697-6957-7 / ISSN: 2340-1095 | doi: 10.21125/iceri.2017). Publisher: IATED, pp. 5195-5201.978-84-697-6957-72340-109510.21125/iceri.2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-06T02:06:23Zoai:bdigital.ufp.pt:10284/7055Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:43:53.978764Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods
title How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods
spellingShingle How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods
Silva, Fátima
Online assessment
e-Learning
Reliability
title_short How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods
title_full How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods
title_fullStr How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods
title_full_unstemmed How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods
title_sort How learners and faculty rate online assessment methods
author Silva, Fátima
author_facet Silva, Fátima
Reis, Pedro
author_role author
author2 Reis, Pedro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Fernando Pessoa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Fátima
Reis, Pedro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Online assessment
e-Learning
Reliability
topic Online assessment
e-Learning
Reliability
description The increasing importance of online education has resulted in attempts to make these teaching/learning means more reliable, valid and feasible in order to avoid the criticisms that are often directed that any e-learning course, above all its assessment process within teaching and learning contexts. Given the potential of online education to higher education, our question is whether, and in what ways, different types of assessments might have an impact on the view faculty and learners have of the assessment methods used in the Virtual University of Fernando Pessoa University (UFP-UV) in Porto, Portugal, in relation to their reliability, feasibility and validity. In this paper we will revisit some of the approaches involved in any assessment process, with particular emphasis on online assessment. The case study carried out sought to investigate the extent to which faculty and learners consider the assessment used in the curricular unit of the e-learning course to be feasible, valid and reliable. These impressions were gauged in two different questionnaires (one for the teachers and another for the learners) in which respondents assigned graded qualitative responses to certain statements, and, in the observation section of the questionnaire, they could provide qualitative comments on the question, thus allowing both a quantitative and a qualitative analysis of the data. The results demonstrate that the virtual classroom is, for both groups in this case study, the mechanism that shows the most reliability whether the virtual classroom acts as a ‘real’ classroom in which both parties are 'face-to-face' via audiovisual means or only the audio means of the virtual classroom is used to question the learner orally.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-11-27T11:25:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10284/7055
url http://hdl.handle.net/10284/7055
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Silva, Fátima & Reis, Pedro (2017) How Learners and Faculty Rate Online Assessment Methods. In: ICERI2017 Proceedings - 10th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain. (ISBN: 978-84-697-6957-7 / ISSN: 2340-1095 | doi: 10.21125/iceri.2017). Publisher: IATED, pp. 5195-5201.
978-84-697-6957-7
2340-1095
10.21125/iceri.2017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IATED
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IATED
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130305913683968