Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25059 |
Resumo: | The understanding of a wide array of practices related to fraud, bribery, corruption, andmore widely, illicit practices have been capturing the attention of practitioners and management researchers worldwide. A substantial portion of the extant research has used university students to measure their actual or intended cheating behaviours and often studies have tested for variations across countries and cultures. We highlight some major concerns in this stream of inquiry and discuss both the definition and some inconclusive results in prior studies, namely those deriving from differences in cheating behaviour across different cultural contexts. We suggest the need to examine intentionality, and further advance that intentionality may assume a reactive or a proactive essence. Depending on the social and formal contexts of different countries, both reactive and proactive intentions lead to distinct moral concerns, which we name in this work omorality (meaning ‘our morality’) or immorality (in the traditional sense).. |
id |
RCAP_6966ba5b76a5e697090ca17815eb8676 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/25059 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentionsCheatingContextIntentionalityIntentionMoralityThe understanding of a wide array of practices related to fraud, bribery, corruption, andmore widely, illicit practices have been capturing the attention of practitioners and management researchers worldwide. A substantial portion of the extant research has used university students to measure their actual or intended cheating behaviours and often studies have tested for variations across countries and cultures. We highlight some major concerns in this stream of inquiry and discuss both the definition and some inconclusive results in prior studies, namely those deriving from differences in cheating behaviour across different cultural contexts. We suggest the need to examine intentionality, and further advance that intentionality may assume a reactive or a proactive essence. Depending on the social and formal contexts of different countries, both reactive and proactive intentions lead to distinct moral concerns, which we name in this work omorality (meaning ‘our morality’) or immorality (in the traditional sense)..This study was partly funded by FCT’s Project PTDC/CS-GEO/102961/2008.Taylor & Francis GroupRepositório da Universidade de LisboaMarques, TâniaFerreira, Manuel PortugalGomes, Jorge F.S.2022-08-01T09:43:35Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25059engMarques, Tânia; Manuel Portugal Ferreira and Jorge F.S. Gomes. (2019). “Understanding cheating behaviours: proactive and reactive intentions”. Ethics and Education, 2019, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 415-429.1744-9650doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1669310info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:54:41Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/25059Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:09:00.526552Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions |
title |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions |
spellingShingle |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions Marques, Tânia Cheating Context Intentionality Intention Morality |
title_short |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions |
title_full |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions |
title_fullStr |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions |
title_sort |
Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions |
author |
Marques, Tânia |
author_facet |
Marques, Tânia Ferreira, Manuel Portugal Gomes, Jorge F.S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Manuel Portugal Gomes, Jorge F.S. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Tânia Ferreira, Manuel Portugal Gomes, Jorge F.S. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cheating Context Intentionality Intention Morality |
topic |
Cheating Context Intentionality Intention Morality |
description |
The understanding of a wide array of practices related to fraud, bribery, corruption, andmore widely, illicit practices have been capturing the attention of practitioners and management researchers worldwide. A substantial portion of the extant research has used university students to measure their actual or intended cheating behaviours and often studies have tested for variations across countries and cultures. We highlight some major concerns in this stream of inquiry and discuss both the definition and some inconclusive results in prior studies, namely those deriving from differences in cheating behaviour across different cultural contexts. We suggest the need to examine intentionality, and further advance that intentionality may assume a reactive or a proactive essence. Depending on the social and formal contexts of different countries, both reactive and proactive intentions lead to distinct moral concerns, which we name in this work omorality (meaning ‘our morality’) or immorality (in the traditional sense).. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z 2022-08-01T09:43:35Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25059 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25059 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Tânia; Manuel Portugal Ferreira and Jorge F.S. Gomes. (2019). “Understanding cheating behaviours: proactive and reactive intentions”. Ethics and Education, 2019, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 415-429. 1744-9650 doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1669310 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131184130686976 |