Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Tânia
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ferreira, Manuel Portugal, Gomes, Jorge F.S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25059
Resumo: The understanding of a wide array of practices related to fraud, bribery, corruption, andmore widely, illicit practices have been capturing the attention of practitioners and management researchers worldwide. A substantial portion of the extant research has used university students to measure their actual or intended cheating behaviours and often studies have tested for variations across countries and cultures. We highlight some major concerns in this stream of inquiry and discuss both the definition and some inconclusive results in prior studies, namely those deriving from differences in cheating behaviour across different cultural contexts. We suggest the need to examine intentionality, and further advance that intentionality may assume a reactive or a proactive essence. Depending on the social and formal contexts of different countries, both reactive and proactive intentions lead to distinct moral concerns, which we name in this work omorality (meaning ‘our morality’) or immorality (in the traditional sense)..
id RCAP_6966ba5b76a5e697090ca17815eb8676
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/25059
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentionsCheatingContextIntentionalityIntentionMoralityThe understanding of a wide array of practices related to fraud, bribery, corruption, andmore widely, illicit practices have been capturing the attention of practitioners and management researchers worldwide. A substantial portion of the extant research has used university students to measure their actual or intended cheating behaviours and often studies have tested for variations across countries and cultures. We highlight some major concerns in this stream of inquiry and discuss both the definition and some inconclusive results in prior studies, namely those deriving from differences in cheating behaviour across different cultural contexts. We suggest the need to examine intentionality, and further advance that intentionality may assume a reactive or a proactive essence. Depending on the social and formal contexts of different countries, both reactive and proactive intentions lead to distinct moral concerns, which we name in this work omorality (meaning ‘our morality’) or immorality (in the traditional sense)..This study was partly funded by FCT’s Project PTDC/CS-GEO/102961/2008.Taylor & Francis GroupRepositório da Universidade de LisboaMarques, TâniaFerreira, Manuel PortugalGomes, Jorge F.S.2022-08-01T09:43:35Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25059engMarques, Tânia; Manuel Portugal Ferreira and Jorge F.S. Gomes. (2019). “Understanding cheating behaviours: proactive and reactive intentions”. Ethics and Education, 2019, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 415-429.1744-9650doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1669310info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:54:41Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/25059Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:09:00.526552Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
title Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
spellingShingle Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
Marques, Tânia
Cheating
Context
Intentionality
Intention
Morality
title_short Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
title_full Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
title_fullStr Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
title_full_unstemmed Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
title_sort Understanding cheating behaviours : proactive and reactive intentions
author Marques, Tânia
author_facet Marques, Tânia
Ferreira, Manuel Portugal
Gomes, Jorge F.S.
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, Manuel Portugal
Gomes, Jorge F.S.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Tânia
Ferreira, Manuel Portugal
Gomes, Jorge F.S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cheating
Context
Intentionality
Intention
Morality
topic Cheating
Context
Intentionality
Intention
Morality
description The understanding of a wide array of practices related to fraud, bribery, corruption, andmore widely, illicit practices have been capturing the attention of practitioners and management researchers worldwide. A substantial portion of the extant research has used university students to measure their actual or intended cheating behaviours and often studies have tested for variations across countries and cultures. We highlight some major concerns in this stream of inquiry and discuss both the definition and some inconclusive results in prior studies, namely those deriving from differences in cheating behaviour across different cultural contexts. We suggest the need to examine intentionality, and further advance that intentionality may assume a reactive or a proactive essence. Depending on the social and formal contexts of different countries, both reactive and proactive intentions lead to distinct moral concerns, which we name in this work omorality (meaning ‘our morality’) or immorality (in the traditional sense)..
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-08-01T09:43:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25059
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25059
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Marques, Tânia; Manuel Portugal Ferreira and Jorge F.S. Gomes. (2019). “Understanding cheating behaviours: proactive and reactive intentions”. Ethics and Education, 2019, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 415-429.
1744-9650
doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1669310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131184130686976