Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22091 |
Resumo: | Remote Work adoption is increasing among organizations. For economic reasons, competitive advantage or even as part of the business continuity plan, Remote Work is a domain worth of further investigation. However, the literature lacks further insights and consensus regarding the decision factors that organizations may consider before and during Remote Work adoption. Design Science Research Methodology was adopted. A thorough and rigorous Systematic Literature Review was performed to elicit the main decision factors (Advantages, Disadvantages, Challenges and Driving Forces) and their relation that influence the Remote Work adoption and its implementation. Plus, a conceptualization of Remote Work domain is presented, and the main decision factors were investigated. A list for each decision factor as well as how they relate among them is also presented and a critical analysis performed. Dozens of factors were identified and related. Those were proven to be extremely important to consider before any Remote Work adoption. This research is a strategic tool for organizations willing to implement Remote Work and a base for further academic developments in the field. In the extent of its complexity, researches from other fields (team management, governance, business process management, among others) are incentivized so valuable inputs may be provided and complement the field. |
id |
RCAP_7712547b0f46d66d8886519d4db04ead |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22091 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysisRemote workDecision factorsChallengesAdvantagesDisadvantagesDriving forcesTrabalho remotoFatores de decisãoDesafiosVantagensDesvantagensForças motrizesRemote Work adoption is increasing among organizations. For economic reasons, competitive advantage or even as part of the business continuity plan, Remote Work is a domain worth of further investigation. However, the literature lacks further insights and consensus regarding the decision factors that organizations may consider before and during Remote Work adoption. Design Science Research Methodology was adopted. A thorough and rigorous Systematic Literature Review was performed to elicit the main decision factors (Advantages, Disadvantages, Challenges and Driving Forces) and their relation that influence the Remote Work adoption and its implementation. Plus, a conceptualization of Remote Work domain is presented, and the main decision factors were investigated. A list for each decision factor as well as how they relate among them is also presented and a critical analysis performed. Dozens of factors were identified and related. Those were proven to be extremely important to consider before any Remote Work adoption. This research is a strategic tool for organizations willing to implement Remote Work and a base for further academic developments in the field. In the extent of its complexity, researches from other fields (team management, governance, business process management, among others) are incentivized so valuable inputs may be provided and complement the field.A adoção do Trabalho Remoto está a aumentar entre as organizações. Por razões económicas, vantagem competitiva ou mesmo como parte do plano de continuidade de negócios, o Trabalho Remoto é um domínio que vale a pena investigar mais a fundo. No entanto, a literatura carece de mais conhecimentos e consenso relativamente aos fatores de decisão que as organizações podem considerar antes e durante a adoção do Trabalho Remoto. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da Literatura minuciosa e rigorosa para obter os principais fatores de decisão que influenciam a adoção do Trabalho Remoto e a sua implementação. Além disso, é apresentada uma conceptualização do domínio do Trabalho Remoto, e os principais fatores de decisão foram investigados. Também é apresentada uma lista para cada facto de decisão, bem como a forma como se relacionam entre eles, e é realizada uma análise crítica. Dezenas de fatores foram identificados e relacionados. Estes provaram ser extremamente importantes a considerar antes de qualquer adoção do Trabalho Remoto. Esta investigação é uma ferramenta estratégica para organizações dispostas a implementar o Trabalho Remoto e uma base para futuros desenvolvimentos académicos no campo do trabalho. Na medida da sua complexidade, as investigações de outros campos (gestão de equipas, governação, gestão de processos empresariais, entre outros) são incentivadas, pelo que podem ser fornecidos contributos valiosos e como tal ajudar a complementar o campo.2021-02-19T10:32:39Z2020-12-02T00:00:00Z2020-12-022020-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22091TID:202627586engFerreira, Rafael Cardoso de Figueiredo Rodriguesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:36:53Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22091Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:16:48.836808Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis |
title |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis |
spellingShingle |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis Ferreira, Rafael Cardoso de Figueiredo Rodrigues Remote work Decision factors Challenges Advantages Disadvantages Driving forces Trabalho remoto Fatores de decisão Desafios Vantagens Desvantagens Forças motrizes |
title_short |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis |
title_full |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis |
title_fullStr |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis |
title_sort |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: A critical analysis |
author |
Ferreira, Rafael Cardoso de Figueiredo Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Rafael Cardoso de Figueiredo Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Rafael Cardoso de Figueiredo Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Remote work Decision factors Challenges Advantages Disadvantages Driving forces Trabalho remoto Fatores de decisão Desafios Vantagens Desvantagens Forças motrizes |
topic |
Remote work Decision factors Challenges Advantages Disadvantages Driving forces Trabalho remoto Fatores de decisão Desafios Vantagens Desvantagens Forças motrizes |
description |
Remote Work adoption is increasing among organizations. For economic reasons, competitive advantage or even as part of the business continuity plan, Remote Work is a domain worth of further investigation. However, the literature lacks further insights and consensus regarding the decision factors that organizations may consider before and during Remote Work adoption. Design Science Research Methodology was adopted. A thorough and rigorous Systematic Literature Review was performed to elicit the main decision factors (Advantages, Disadvantages, Challenges and Driving Forces) and their relation that influence the Remote Work adoption and its implementation. Plus, a conceptualization of Remote Work domain is presented, and the main decision factors were investigated. A list for each decision factor as well as how they relate among them is also presented and a critical analysis performed. Dozens of factors were identified and related. Those were proven to be extremely important to consider before any Remote Work adoption. This research is a strategic tool for organizations willing to implement Remote Work and a base for further academic developments in the field. In the extent of its complexity, researches from other fields (team management, governance, business process management, among others) are incentivized so valuable inputs may be provided and complement the field. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-02T00:00:00Z 2020-12-02 2020-10 2021-02-19T10:32:39Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22091 TID:202627586 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22091 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202627586 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134727107510272 |