Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, R
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pereira, R., Bianchi, I. S., Silva, M. M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22896
Resumo: Facing one of the most challenging pandemics for organizational modus operandi (COVID-19), organizations are struggling for operational and strategic support. The adoption of remote work (RW) is increasing. For economic reasons, competitive advantage, or even as a pandemic response (business continuity plan), RW is a domain worth further investigation. However, the literature lacks insight regarding RW adoption. A design science research methodology was adopted, including a systematic literature review to elicit RW advantages, disadvantages, challenges and driving forces, as well as their relation. To evaluate and demonstrate findings, 129 qualitative interviews were performed with RW professionals. In the end, 57 decision factors were elicited, and 16 relations were validated. The authors concluded that cost-reduction and flexibility to promote work–life balance is the most positive outputs, while communication and technical problems, as well as management issues, are what most concerns professionals. Moreover, positive relations are more recognized among professionals over negative ones.
id RCAP_ee101290834405baf02a9c24b361a5cd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22896
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challengesRemote workDecision factorsSystematic literature reviewDesign science researchInterviewsAdvantagesDisadvantagesDriving forcesChallengesFacing one of the most challenging pandemics for organizational modus operandi (COVID-19), organizations are struggling for operational and strategic support. The adoption of remote work (RW) is increasing. For economic reasons, competitive advantage, or even as a pandemic response (business continuity plan), RW is a domain worth further investigation. However, the literature lacks insight regarding RW adoption. A design science research methodology was adopted, including a systematic literature review to elicit RW advantages, disadvantages, challenges and driving forces, as well as their relation. To evaluate and demonstrate findings, 129 qualitative interviews were performed with RW professionals. In the end, 57 decision factors were elicited, and 16 relations were validated. The authors concluded that cost-reduction and flexibility to promote work–life balance is the most positive outputs, while communication and technical problems, as well as management issues, are what most concerns professionals. Moreover, positive relations are more recognized among professionals over negative ones.MDPI2021-07-12T13:53:55Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-07-12T14:53:24Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22896eng2199-853110.3390/joitmc7010070Ferreira, RPereira, R.Bianchi, I. S.Silva, M. M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:49:23Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22896Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:24:15.201542Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
title Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
spellingShingle Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
Ferreira, R
Remote work
Decision factors
Systematic literature review
Design science research
Interviews
Advantages
Disadvantages
Driving forces
Challenges
title_short Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
title_full Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
title_fullStr Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
title_full_unstemmed Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
title_sort Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
author Ferreira, R
author_facet Ferreira, R
Pereira, R.
Bianchi, I. S.
Silva, M. M.
author_role author
author2 Pereira, R.
Bianchi, I. S.
Silva, M. M.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, R
Pereira, R.
Bianchi, I. S.
Silva, M. M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Remote work
Decision factors
Systematic literature review
Design science research
Interviews
Advantages
Disadvantages
Driving forces
Challenges
topic Remote work
Decision factors
Systematic literature review
Design science research
Interviews
Advantages
Disadvantages
Driving forces
Challenges
description Facing one of the most challenging pandemics for organizational modus operandi (COVID-19), organizations are struggling for operational and strategic support. The adoption of remote work (RW) is increasing. For economic reasons, competitive advantage, or even as a pandemic response (business continuity plan), RW is a domain worth further investigation. However, the literature lacks insight regarding RW adoption. A design science research methodology was adopted, including a systematic literature review to elicit RW advantages, disadvantages, challenges and driving forces, as well as their relation. To evaluate and demonstrate findings, 129 qualitative interviews were performed with RW professionals. In the end, 57 decision factors were elicited, and 16 relations were validated. The authors concluded that cost-reduction and flexibility to promote work–life balance is the most positive outputs, while communication and technical problems, as well as management issues, are what most concerns professionals. Moreover, positive relations are more recognized among professionals over negative ones.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-12T13:53:55Z
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
2021-07-12T14:53:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22896
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22896
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2199-8531
10.3390/joitmc7010070
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134804302626816