Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22896 |
Resumo: | Facing one of the most challenging pandemics for organizational modus operandi (COVID-19), organizations are struggling for operational and strategic support. The adoption of remote work (RW) is increasing. For economic reasons, competitive advantage, or even as a pandemic response (business continuity plan), RW is a domain worth further investigation. However, the literature lacks insight regarding RW adoption. A design science research methodology was adopted, including a systematic literature review to elicit RW advantages, disadvantages, challenges and driving forces, as well as their relation. To evaluate and demonstrate findings, 129 qualitative interviews were performed with RW professionals. In the end, 57 decision factors were elicited, and 16 relations were validated. The authors concluded that cost-reduction and flexibility to promote work–life balance is the most positive outputs, while communication and technical problems, as well as management issues, are what most concerns professionals. Moreover, positive relations are more recognized among professionals over negative ones. |
id |
RCAP_ee101290834405baf02a9c24b361a5cd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22896 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challengesRemote workDecision factorsSystematic literature reviewDesign science researchInterviewsAdvantagesDisadvantagesDriving forcesChallengesFacing one of the most challenging pandemics for organizational modus operandi (COVID-19), organizations are struggling for operational and strategic support. The adoption of remote work (RW) is increasing. For economic reasons, competitive advantage, or even as a pandemic response (business continuity plan), RW is a domain worth further investigation. However, the literature lacks insight regarding RW adoption. A design science research methodology was adopted, including a systematic literature review to elicit RW advantages, disadvantages, challenges and driving forces, as well as their relation. To evaluate and demonstrate findings, 129 qualitative interviews were performed with RW professionals. In the end, 57 decision factors were elicited, and 16 relations were validated. The authors concluded that cost-reduction and flexibility to promote work–life balance is the most positive outputs, while communication and technical problems, as well as management issues, are what most concerns professionals. Moreover, positive relations are more recognized among professionals over negative ones.MDPI2021-07-12T13:53:55Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-07-12T14:53:24Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22896eng2199-853110.3390/joitmc7010070Ferreira, RPereira, R.Bianchi, I. S.Silva, M. M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:49:23Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22896Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:24:15.201542Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges |
title |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges |
spellingShingle |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges Ferreira, R Remote work Decision factors Systematic literature review Design science research Interviews Advantages Disadvantages Driving forces Challenges |
title_short |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges |
title_full |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges |
title_fullStr |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges |
title_sort |
Decision factors for remote work adoption: Advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges |
author |
Ferreira, R |
author_facet |
Ferreira, R Pereira, R. Bianchi, I. S. Silva, M. M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, R. Bianchi, I. S. Silva, M. M. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, R Pereira, R. Bianchi, I. S. Silva, M. M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Remote work Decision factors Systematic literature review Design science research Interviews Advantages Disadvantages Driving forces Challenges |
topic |
Remote work Decision factors Systematic literature review Design science research Interviews Advantages Disadvantages Driving forces Challenges |
description |
Facing one of the most challenging pandemics for organizational modus operandi (COVID-19), organizations are struggling for operational and strategic support. The adoption of remote work (RW) is increasing. For economic reasons, competitive advantage, or even as a pandemic response (business continuity plan), RW is a domain worth further investigation. However, the literature lacks insight regarding RW adoption. A design science research methodology was adopted, including a systematic literature review to elicit RW advantages, disadvantages, challenges and driving forces, as well as their relation. To evaluate and demonstrate findings, 129 qualitative interviews were performed with RW professionals. In the end, 57 decision factors were elicited, and 16 relations were validated. The authors concluded that cost-reduction and flexibility to promote work–life balance is the most positive outputs, while communication and technical problems, as well as management issues, are what most concerns professionals. Moreover, positive relations are more recognized among professionals over negative ones. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-12T13:53:55Z 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021 2021-07-12T14:53:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22896 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22896 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2199-8531 10.3390/joitmc7010070 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134804302626816 |