Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/45940 |
Resumo: | The present study seeks to address, define and delimit the contours of the political dimension of communication and graphic design, while establishing a contrast and criticism to the paradigm that is experienced today in this subject. Design history, from the beginning of the twentieth century up to present day, has revealed an approach to the commercial and entrepreneurial spheres, while at the same time renegading its social and political aspects. Recently, there has been a growing change, increasingly visible in the discipline's discourse. Today we speak in terms of critical design, social design, design activism and design thinking. Are these new and independent methods of doing design? Or maybe it doesn't make sense to separate these concepts from design itself – isn't all this design? The issue of design ethics has also emerged in academic articles and essays reflecting a growing concern that aims to respond to the emergence of design in the most diverse areas of our lives. Today, design is present in everything we see inside and outside our homes. What responsibility does the designer have in designing our world and reality? In what ways can this responsibility be translated? In order to try to build a conceptual framework for the practice of design from now on, I propose that we make an analysis of the discipline around the two movements that emerged from the end of the 19th century and that lasted until the end of the 20th century: Modernism and Postmodernism. To realize how design has followed a set of values, ideas and feelings reflected during these two stages of human thought, is paramount to more easily understand how the design of the future can be guided by a set of aesthetic, artistic, cultural and philosophical developments that aim to react to postmodernism and which we name Metamodernism. Metamodernist’s sensibility, characterized by informed naivety and pragmatic idealism, is a very recent cultural response to global phenomena that have shaped and continue to shape our most basic notions of being. Amid issues such as climate change, financial crisis, and the escalation of global conflicts, a collective and palpable longing for change grows. Perhaps this path can lead us into finding ideas for a new “spirit” for the practice of design and a new, broader role for the designer, whose potential can go far beyond the aesthetical and the commercial. |
id |
RCAP_966bc101713571504370a8b7e75a2eb4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/45940 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismoDesign de comunicaçãoDesign gráficoDesign e políticaFilosofia do designMoralCapitalismoCriticismoMetamodernismoAtivismoDomínio/Área Científica::Humanidades::ArtesThe present study seeks to address, define and delimit the contours of the political dimension of communication and graphic design, while establishing a contrast and criticism to the paradigm that is experienced today in this subject. Design history, from the beginning of the twentieth century up to present day, has revealed an approach to the commercial and entrepreneurial spheres, while at the same time renegading its social and political aspects. Recently, there has been a growing change, increasingly visible in the discipline's discourse. Today we speak in terms of critical design, social design, design activism and design thinking. Are these new and independent methods of doing design? Or maybe it doesn't make sense to separate these concepts from design itself – isn't all this design? The issue of design ethics has also emerged in academic articles and essays reflecting a growing concern that aims to respond to the emergence of design in the most diverse areas of our lives. Today, design is present in everything we see inside and outside our homes. What responsibility does the designer have in designing our world and reality? In what ways can this responsibility be translated? In order to try to build a conceptual framework for the practice of design from now on, I propose that we make an analysis of the discipline around the two movements that emerged from the end of the 19th century and that lasted until the end of the 20th century: Modernism and Postmodernism. To realize how design has followed a set of values, ideas and feelings reflected during these two stages of human thought, is paramount to more easily understand how the design of the future can be guided by a set of aesthetic, artistic, cultural and philosophical developments that aim to react to postmodernism and which we name Metamodernism. Metamodernist’s sensibility, characterized by informed naivety and pragmatic idealism, is a very recent cultural response to global phenomena that have shaped and continue to shape our most basic notions of being. Amid issues such as climate change, financial crisis, and the escalation of global conflicts, a collective and palpable longing for change grows. Perhaps this path can lead us into finding ideas for a new “spirit” for the practice of design and a new, broader role for the designer, whose potential can go far beyond the aesthetical and the commercial.Rodrigues, Sofia LealRepositório da Universidade de LisboaLopes, Pedro Bicá Viseu2021-01-27T12:18:29Z2020-12-182020-12-18T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisimage/jpegapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/45940TID:202582388porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:48:02Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/45940Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:58:16.888489Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo |
title |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo |
spellingShingle |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo Lopes, Pedro Bicá Viseu Design de comunicação Design gráfico Design e política Filosofia do design Moral Capitalismo Criticismo Metamodernismo Ativismo Domínio/Área Científica::Humanidades::Artes |
title_short |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo |
title_full |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo |
title_fullStr |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo |
title_sort |
Os desafios do Design: design e metamodernismo |
author |
Lopes, Pedro Bicá Viseu |
author_facet |
Lopes, Pedro Bicá Viseu |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Sofia Leal Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Pedro Bicá Viseu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Design de comunicação Design gráfico Design e política Filosofia do design Moral Capitalismo Criticismo Metamodernismo Ativismo Domínio/Área Científica::Humanidades::Artes |
topic |
Design de comunicação Design gráfico Design e política Filosofia do design Moral Capitalismo Criticismo Metamodernismo Ativismo Domínio/Área Científica::Humanidades::Artes |
description |
The present study seeks to address, define and delimit the contours of the political dimension of communication and graphic design, while establishing a contrast and criticism to the paradigm that is experienced today in this subject. Design history, from the beginning of the twentieth century up to present day, has revealed an approach to the commercial and entrepreneurial spheres, while at the same time renegading its social and political aspects. Recently, there has been a growing change, increasingly visible in the discipline's discourse. Today we speak in terms of critical design, social design, design activism and design thinking. Are these new and independent methods of doing design? Or maybe it doesn't make sense to separate these concepts from design itself – isn't all this design? The issue of design ethics has also emerged in academic articles and essays reflecting a growing concern that aims to respond to the emergence of design in the most diverse areas of our lives. Today, design is present in everything we see inside and outside our homes. What responsibility does the designer have in designing our world and reality? In what ways can this responsibility be translated? In order to try to build a conceptual framework for the practice of design from now on, I propose that we make an analysis of the discipline around the two movements that emerged from the end of the 19th century and that lasted until the end of the 20th century: Modernism and Postmodernism. To realize how design has followed a set of values, ideas and feelings reflected during these two stages of human thought, is paramount to more easily understand how the design of the future can be guided by a set of aesthetic, artistic, cultural and philosophical developments that aim to react to postmodernism and which we name Metamodernism. Metamodernist’s sensibility, characterized by informed naivety and pragmatic idealism, is a very recent cultural response to global phenomena that have shaped and continue to shape our most basic notions of being. Amid issues such as climate change, financial crisis, and the escalation of global conflicts, a collective and palpable longing for change grows. Perhaps this path can lead us into finding ideas for a new “spirit” for the practice of design and a new, broader role for the designer, whose potential can go far beyond the aesthetical and the commercial. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-18 2020-12-18T00:00:00Z 2021-01-27T12:18:29Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/45940 TID:202582388 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/45940 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202582388 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
image/jpeg application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134528767262720 |