Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva, Lucas Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4
Resumo: In this article, we aim to discuss about a rhetorical-argumentative strategy of using epistemic argumentative instances to delegitimize the Motivating Circumstances that are constitutive of the polemics concerning Escola Sem Partido (ESP). We use a text representative of the position contrary to the ESP that aims to reframe the Practical Problem concerning the possible needs for action that become relevant in the social sphere of educational practices. For this, we assume the Argumentation Theory, in particular the notions of macrostructure and functional configuration of epistemic argumentation (Toulmin, 2003[1958]; Toulmin; Rieke; Janik, 1984[1978]) and practical argumentation (Fairclough; Fairclough, 2012; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2019). More punctually, we assume the studies on Polemics (Amossy, 2016; 2014), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2018), in addition to the cognitive-functional discussion on Epistemic Positioning (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2020b; Marín-Arrese, 2011). We identified an articulation that, firstly, seeks to question the validity of the reading of the current state of affairs in the discourse of favorable positions to the ESP and that, secondly, challenges the Motivating Circumstances that justify the ESP proposal and that fuel controversial dissent. This, in turn, results in an attempt to reframe the Practical Problem, in order to seek to focus on topics and themes considered of paramount importance for the maintenance of an educational system that needs improvement.
id RCAP_9f30e05d0f2621de1d176c96366a0a63
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/13237
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysisEscola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysisArgumentationEscola Sem PartidoCritical Discourse AnalysisPolemicsBrazilian EducationArgumentationEscola Sem PartidoCritical Discourse AnalysisPolemicsBrazilian EducationIn this article, we aim to discuss about a rhetorical-argumentative strategy of using epistemic argumentative instances to delegitimize the Motivating Circumstances that are constitutive of the polemics concerning Escola Sem Partido (ESP). We use a text representative of the position contrary to the ESP that aims to reframe the Practical Problem concerning the possible needs for action that become relevant in the social sphere of educational practices. For this, we assume the Argumentation Theory, in particular the notions of macrostructure and functional configuration of epistemic argumentation (Toulmin, 2003[1958]; Toulmin; Rieke; Janik, 1984[1978]) and practical argumentation (Fairclough; Fairclough, 2012; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2019). More punctually, we assume the studies on Polemics (Amossy, 2016; 2014), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2018), in addition to the cognitive-functional discussion on Epistemic Positioning (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2020b; Marín-Arrese, 2011). We identified an articulation that, firstly, seeks to question the validity of the reading of the current state of affairs in the discourse of favorable positions to the ESP and that, secondly, challenges the Motivating Circumstances that justify the ESP proposal and that fuel controversial dissent. This, in turn, results in an attempt to reframe the Practical Problem, in order to seek to focus on topics and themes considered of paramount importance for the maintenance of an educational system that needs improvement.In this article, we aim to discuss about a rhetorical-argumentative strategy of using epistemic argumentative instances to delegitimize the Motivating Circumstances that are constitutive of the polemics concerning Escola Sem Partido (ESP). We use a text representative of the position contrary to the ESP that aims to reframe the Practical Problem concerning the possible needs for action that become relevant in the social sphere of educational practices. For this, we assume the Argumentation Theory, in particular the notions of macrostructure and functional configuration of epistemic argumentation (Toulmin, 2003[1958]; Toulmin; Rieke; Janik, 1984[1978]) and practical argumentation (Fairclough; Fairclough, 2012; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2019). More punctually, we assume the studies on Polemics (Amossy, 2016; 2014), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2018), in addition to the cognitive-functional discussion on Epistemic Positioning (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2020b; Marín-Arrese, 2011). We identified an articulation that, firstly, seeks to question the validity of the reading of the current state of affairs in the discourse of favorable positions to the ESP and that, secondly, challenges the Motivating Circumstances that justify the ESP proposal and that fuel controversial dissent. This, in turn, results in an attempt to reframe the Practical Problem, in order to seek to focus on topics and themes considered of paramount importance for the maintenance of an educational system that needs improvement.Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso2023-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 12 (2023): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 99-1322183-395810.21747/21833958/red12reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/13237https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/13237/12189Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Lucas Pereira da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Lucas Pereira2023-10-06T11:15:24Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/13237Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:31:42.385144Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
title Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
spellingShingle Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
da Silva, Lucas Pereira
Argumentation
Escola Sem Partido
Critical Discourse Analysis
Polemics
Brazilian Education
Argumentation
Escola Sem Partido
Critical Discourse Analysis
Polemics
Brazilian Education
title_short Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
title_full Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
title_fullStr Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
title_sort Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
author da Silva, Lucas Pereira
author_facet da Silva, Lucas Pereira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva, Lucas Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argumentation
Escola Sem Partido
Critical Discourse Analysis
Polemics
Brazilian Education
Argumentation
Escola Sem Partido
Critical Discourse Analysis
Polemics
Brazilian Education
topic Argumentation
Escola Sem Partido
Critical Discourse Analysis
Polemics
Brazilian Education
Argumentation
Escola Sem Partido
Critical Discourse Analysis
Polemics
Brazilian Education
description In this article, we aim to discuss about a rhetorical-argumentative strategy of using epistemic argumentative instances to delegitimize the Motivating Circumstances that are constitutive of the polemics concerning Escola Sem Partido (ESP). We use a text representative of the position contrary to the ESP that aims to reframe the Practical Problem concerning the possible needs for action that become relevant in the social sphere of educational practices. For this, we assume the Argumentation Theory, in particular the notions of macrostructure and functional configuration of epistemic argumentation (Toulmin, 2003[1958]; Toulmin; Rieke; Janik, 1984[1978]) and practical argumentation (Fairclough; Fairclough, 2012; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2019). More punctually, we assume the studies on Polemics (Amossy, 2016; 2014), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2018), in addition to the cognitive-functional discussion on Epistemic Positioning (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2020b; Marín-Arrese, 2011). We identified an articulation that, firstly, seeks to question the validity of the reading of the current state of affairs in the discourse of favorable positions to the ESP and that, secondly, challenges the Motivating Circumstances that justify the ESP proposal and that fuel controversial dissent. This, in turn, results in an attempt to reframe the Practical Problem, in order to seek to focus on topics and themes considered of paramount importance for the maintenance of an educational system that needs improvement.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4
https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4
url https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/13237
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/13237/12189
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Lucas Pereira da Silva
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Lucas Pereira da Silva
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 12 (2023): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 99-132
2183-3958
10.21747/21833958/red12
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133584878993408