Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4 |
Resumo: | In this article, we aim to discuss about a rhetorical-argumentative strategy of using epistemic argumentative instances to delegitimize the Motivating Circumstances that are constitutive of the polemics concerning Escola Sem Partido (ESP). We use a text representative of the position contrary to the ESP that aims to reframe the Practical Problem concerning the possible needs for action that become relevant in the social sphere of educational practices. For this, we assume the Argumentation Theory, in particular the notions of macrostructure and functional configuration of epistemic argumentation (Toulmin, 2003[1958]; Toulmin; Rieke; Janik, 1984[1978]) and practical argumentation (Fairclough; Fairclough, 2012; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2019). More punctually, we assume the studies on Polemics (Amossy, 2016; 2014), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2018), in addition to the cognitive-functional discussion on Epistemic Positioning (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2020b; Marín-Arrese, 2011). We identified an articulation that, firstly, seeks to question the validity of the reading of the current state of affairs in the discourse of favorable positions to the ESP and that, secondly, challenges the Motivating Circumstances that justify the ESP proposal and that fuel controversial dissent. This, in turn, results in an attempt to reframe the Practical Problem, in order to seek to focus on topics and themes considered of paramount importance for the maintenance of an educational system that needs improvement. |
id |
RCAP_9f30e05d0f2621de1d176c96366a0a63 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/13237 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysisEscola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysisArgumentationEscola Sem PartidoCritical Discourse AnalysisPolemicsBrazilian EducationArgumentationEscola Sem PartidoCritical Discourse AnalysisPolemicsBrazilian EducationIn this article, we aim to discuss about a rhetorical-argumentative strategy of using epistemic argumentative instances to delegitimize the Motivating Circumstances that are constitutive of the polemics concerning Escola Sem Partido (ESP). We use a text representative of the position contrary to the ESP that aims to reframe the Practical Problem concerning the possible needs for action that become relevant in the social sphere of educational practices. For this, we assume the Argumentation Theory, in particular the notions of macrostructure and functional configuration of epistemic argumentation (Toulmin, 2003[1958]; Toulmin; Rieke; Janik, 1984[1978]) and practical argumentation (Fairclough; Fairclough, 2012; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2019). More punctually, we assume the studies on Polemics (Amossy, 2016; 2014), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2018), in addition to the cognitive-functional discussion on Epistemic Positioning (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2020b; Marín-Arrese, 2011). We identified an articulation that, firstly, seeks to question the validity of the reading of the current state of affairs in the discourse of favorable positions to the ESP and that, secondly, challenges the Motivating Circumstances that justify the ESP proposal and that fuel controversial dissent. This, in turn, results in an attempt to reframe the Practical Problem, in order to seek to focus on topics and themes considered of paramount importance for the maintenance of an educational system that needs improvement.In this article, we aim to discuss about a rhetorical-argumentative strategy of using epistemic argumentative instances to delegitimize the Motivating Circumstances that are constitutive of the polemics concerning Escola Sem Partido (ESP). We use a text representative of the position contrary to the ESP that aims to reframe the Practical Problem concerning the possible needs for action that become relevant in the social sphere of educational practices. For this, we assume the Argumentation Theory, in particular the notions of macrostructure and functional configuration of epistemic argumentation (Toulmin, 2003[1958]; Toulmin; Rieke; Janik, 1984[1978]) and practical argumentation (Fairclough; Fairclough, 2012; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2019). More punctually, we assume the studies on Polemics (Amossy, 2016; 2014), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2018), in addition to the cognitive-functional discussion on Epistemic Positioning (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2020b; Marín-Arrese, 2011). We identified an articulation that, firstly, seeks to question the validity of the reading of the current state of affairs in the discourse of favorable positions to the ESP and that, secondly, challenges the Motivating Circumstances that justify the ESP proposal and that fuel controversial dissent. This, in turn, results in an attempt to reframe the Practical Problem, in order to seek to focus on topics and themes considered of paramount importance for the maintenance of an educational system that needs improvement.Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso2023-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 12 (2023): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 99-1322183-395810.21747/21833958/red12reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/13237https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/13237/12189Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Lucas Pereira da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Lucas Pereira2023-10-06T11:15:24Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/13237Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:31:42.385144Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis |
title |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis |
spellingShingle |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis da Silva, Lucas Pereira Argumentation Escola Sem Partido Critical Discourse Analysis Polemics Brazilian Education Argumentation Escola Sem Partido Critical Discourse Analysis Polemics Brazilian Education |
title_short |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis |
title_full |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis |
title_fullStr |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis |
title_sort |
Escola Sem Partido and the (real) problems of Brazilian education: an argumentative analysis |
author |
da Silva, Lucas Pereira |
author_facet |
da Silva, Lucas Pereira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Lucas Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Argumentation Escola Sem Partido Critical Discourse Analysis Polemics Brazilian Education Argumentation Escola Sem Partido Critical Discourse Analysis Polemics Brazilian Education |
topic |
Argumentation Escola Sem Partido Critical Discourse Analysis Polemics Brazilian Education Argumentation Escola Sem Partido Critical Discourse Analysis Polemics Brazilian Education |
description |
In this article, we aim to discuss about a rhetorical-argumentative strategy of using epistemic argumentative instances to delegitimize the Motivating Circumstances that are constitutive of the polemics concerning Escola Sem Partido (ESP). We use a text representative of the position contrary to the ESP that aims to reframe the Practical Problem concerning the possible needs for action that become relevant in the social sphere of educational practices. For this, we assume the Argumentation Theory, in particular the notions of macrostructure and functional configuration of epistemic argumentation (Toulmin, 2003[1958]; Toulmin; Rieke; Janik, 1984[1978]) and practical argumentation (Fairclough; Fairclough, 2012; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2019). More punctually, we assume the studies on Polemics (Amossy, 2016; 2014), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Gonçalves-Segundo, 2018), in addition to the cognitive-functional discussion on Epistemic Positioning (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2020b; Marín-Arrese, 2011). We identified an articulation that, firstly, seeks to question the validity of the reading of the current state of affairs in the discourse of favorable positions to the ESP and that, secondly, challenges the Motivating Circumstances that justify the ESP proposal and that fuel controversial dissent. This, in turn, results in an attempt to reframe the Practical Problem, in order to seek to focus on topics and themes considered of paramount importance for the maintenance of an educational system that needs improvement. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4 https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a4 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/13237 https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/13237/12189 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Lucas Pereira da Silva info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Lucas Pereira da Silva |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 12 (2023): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 99-132 2183-3958 10.21747/21833958/red12 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133584878993408 |