Accreditation. Priority and challenge.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1996 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2536 |
Resumo: | This article aims at rousing the discussion of a subject in which Portugal does not have a definitive position and on which the doctors' contribution, although fundamental, is not yet defined. The concept and evolution of accreditation, its advantages and inconveniences, the method (standards, accreditation body and process) and experience of some countries are reviewed according to recent bibliography. |
id |
RCAP_a73f03fdf8e7ec4fdbf7f76e82821cae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2536 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge.Acreditação. Prioridade e desafio.This article aims at rousing the discussion of a subject in which Portugal does not have a definitive position and on which the doctors' contribution, although fundamental, is not yet defined. The concept and evolution of accreditation, its advantages and inconveniences, the method (standards, accreditation body and process) and experience of some countries are reviewed according to recent bibliography.This article aims at rousing the discussion of a subject in which Portugal does not have a definitive position and on which the doctors' contribution, although fundamental, is not yet defined. The concept and evolution of accreditation, its advantages and inconveniences, the method (standards, accreditation body and process) and experience of some countries are reviewed according to recent bibliography.Ordem dos Médicos1996-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2536oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2536Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 9 No. 1 (1996): Janeiro; 59-66Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 9 N.º 1 (1996): Janeiro; 59-661646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2536https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2536/1950Imperatori, Einfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:00:44Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2536Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:17:49.120547Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge. Acreditação. Prioridade e desafio. |
title |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge. |
spellingShingle |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge. Imperatori, E |
title_short |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge. |
title_full |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge. |
title_fullStr |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge. |
title_sort |
Accreditation. Priority and challenge. |
author |
Imperatori, E |
author_facet |
Imperatori, E |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Imperatori, E |
description |
This article aims at rousing the discussion of a subject in which Portugal does not have a definitive position and on which the doctors' contribution, although fundamental, is not yet defined. The concept and evolution of accreditation, its advantages and inconveniences, the method (standards, accreditation body and process) and experience of some countries are reviewed according to recent bibliography. |
publishDate |
1996 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1996-01-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2536 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2536 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2536 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2536 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2536 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2536/1950 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 9 No. 1 (1996): Janeiro; 59-66 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 9 N.º 1 (1996): Janeiro; 59-66 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130631366508544 |