Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/40227 |
Resumo: | Background Several studies link the seamless fit of implant-supported prosthesis with the accuracy of the dental impression technique obtained during acquisition. In addition, factors such as implant angulation and coping shape contribute to implant misfit. Purpose To identify the most accurate impression technique and factors affecting the impression accuracy. Material and Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted analyzing articles published between 2009 and 2013. The following search terms were used: implant impression, impression accuracy, and implant misfit. A total of 417 articles was identified, 32 were selected for review. Results All 32 selected studies refer to in vitro studies. Fourteen articles compare open and closed impression technique, 8 advocate the open technique and 6 report similar results. Other 14 articles evaluate splinted and non-splinted techniques; all advocating the splinted technique. Polyether material usage was reported in 9; 6 studies tested vinyl polysiloane and 1 study used irreversible hydrocolloid. Eight studies evaluated different copings designs. Intra-oral optical devices were compared in 4 studies. Conclusions The most accurate results were achieved with two configurations: (1) the optical intra-oral system with powder; and (2) the open technique with splinted squared transfer copings, using polyether as impression material. |
id |
RCAP_b3d05302086bce57a815d2954c636dc2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/40227 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic reviewImplant impressionImplant misfitImpression accuracyOptical scanningDental prosthesisCiências Médicas::Medicina ClínicaScience & TechnologyBackground Several studies link the seamless fit of implant-supported prosthesis with the accuracy of the dental impression technique obtained during acquisition. In addition, factors such as implant angulation and coping shape contribute to implant misfit. Purpose To identify the most accurate impression technique and factors affecting the impression accuracy. Material and Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted analyzing articles published between 2009 and 2013. The following search terms were used: implant impression, impression accuracy, and implant misfit. A total of 417 articles was identified, 32 were selected for review. Results All 32 selected studies refer to in vitro studies. Fourteen articles compare open and closed impression technique, 8 advocate the open technique and 6 report similar results. Other 14 articles evaluate splinted and non-splinted techniques; all advocating the splinted technique. Polyether material usage was reported in 9; 6 studies tested vinyl polysiloane and 1 study used irreversible hydrocolloid. Eight studies evaluated different copings designs. Intra-oral optical devices were compared in 4 studies. Conclusions The most accurate results were achieved with two configurations: (1) the optical intra-oral system with powder; and (2) the open technique with splinted squared transfer copings, using polyether as impression material.FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia in the scope of the Ph.D. grant SFRH/BD/68270/2010, project EXPL/BBB-BMD/2146/2013 and within the Project Scope UID/CEC/00319/2013WileyUniversidade do MinhoMoreira, António Herculano JesusRodrigues, Nuno F.Pinho, A. C. Marques deFonseca, Jaime C.Vilaça, João L.2015-102015-10-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/40227engMoreira, A. H., Rodrigues, N. F., Pinho, A., Fonseca, J. C., & Vilaça, J. L. (2015). Accuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 17(S2), e751-e7641523-089910.1111/cid.1231025828851http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.12310/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T11:54:35Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/40227Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:44:04.268278Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review |
title |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review Moreira, António Herculano Jesus Implant impression Implant misfit Impression accuracy Optical scanning Dental prosthesis Ciências Médicas::Medicina Clínica Science & Technology |
title_short |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review |
title_full |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review |
title_sort |
Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: A systematic review |
author |
Moreira, António Herculano Jesus |
author_facet |
Moreira, António Herculano Jesus Rodrigues, Nuno F. Pinho, A. C. Marques de Fonseca, Jaime C. Vilaça, João L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues, Nuno F. Pinho, A. C. Marques de Fonseca, Jaime C. Vilaça, João L. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira, António Herculano Jesus Rodrigues, Nuno F. Pinho, A. C. Marques de Fonseca, Jaime C. Vilaça, João L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Implant impression Implant misfit Impression accuracy Optical scanning Dental prosthesis Ciências Médicas::Medicina Clínica Science & Technology |
topic |
Implant impression Implant misfit Impression accuracy Optical scanning Dental prosthesis Ciências Médicas::Medicina Clínica Science & Technology |
description |
Background Several studies link the seamless fit of implant-supported prosthesis with the accuracy of the dental impression technique obtained during acquisition. In addition, factors such as implant angulation and coping shape contribute to implant misfit. Purpose To identify the most accurate impression technique and factors affecting the impression accuracy. Material and Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted analyzing articles published between 2009 and 2013. The following search terms were used: implant impression, impression accuracy, and implant misfit. A total of 417 articles was identified, 32 were selected for review. Results All 32 selected studies refer to in vitro studies. Fourteen articles compare open and closed impression technique, 8 advocate the open technique and 6 report similar results. Other 14 articles evaluate splinted and non-splinted techniques; all advocating the splinted technique. Polyether material usage was reported in 9; 6 studies tested vinyl polysiloane and 1 study used irreversible hydrocolloid. Eight studies evaluated different copings designs. Intra-oral optical devices were compared in 4 studies. Conclusions The most accurate results were achieved with two configurations: (1) the optical intra-oral system with powder; and (2) the open technique with splinted squared transfer copings, using polyether as impression material. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10 2015-10-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/40227 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/40227 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Moreira, A. H., Rodrigues, N. F., Pinho, A., Fonseca, J. C., & Vilaça, J. L. (2015). Accuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 17(S2), e751-e764 1523-0899 10.1111/cid.12310 25828851 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.12310/full |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132189486481408 |