Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Belchior, A. M.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Lopes, H., Cabrita, L., Tsatsanis, E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29990
Resumo: To what extent are political parties responsive to voters before and after elections (that is, in campaign and in office)? And what explains responsiveness at both these stages: the agenda-setting and the decision-making stages? We argue that parties are more responsive at the agenda-setting stage than at the decision-making, and that responsiveness tends to be mediated by the type of promise (change versus status quo, and issue salience), and of governments (majority versus minority, and left versus right-wing). This research focuses on the Portuguese case using data from party manifestos between 1995 and 2015, as well as surveys of Portuguese citizens. Findings generally support our expectations, although with some differences between parties as a whole and governments. Our results have important implications for the understanding of the opinion-policy linkage and mandate-responsiveness, as well as more broadly of party competition.
id RCAP_db9089bf194d6cfe81b3d270310aed39
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29990
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promiseAgenda-settingDecision-makingPolitical partiesPublic opinionResponsivenessTo what extent are political parties responsive to voters before and after elections (that is, in campaign and in office)? And what explains responsiveness at both these stages: the agenda-setting and the decision-making stages? We argue that parties are more responsive at the agenda-setting stage than at the decision-making, and that responsiveness tends to be mediated by the type of promise (change versus status quo, and issue salience), and of governments (majority versus minority, and left versus right-wing). This research focuses on the Portuguese case using data from party manifestos between 1995 and 2015, as well as surveys of Portuguese citizens. Findings generally support our expectations, although with some differences between parties as a whole and governments. Our results have important implications for the understanding of the opinion-policy linkage and mandate-responsiveness, as well as more broadly of party competition.SAGE2023-12-13T10:12:09Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z20232023-12-13T10:11:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/29990eng0192-512110.1177/01925121231155140Belchior, A. M.Lopes, H.Cabrita, L.Tsatsanis, E.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-17T01:17:34Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29990Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:54:38.953390Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise
title Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise
spellingShingle Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise
Belchior, A. M.
Agenda-setting
Decision-making
Political parties
Public opinion
Responsiveness
title_short Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise
title_full Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise
title_fullStr Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise
title_full_unstemmed Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise
title_sort Party policy responsiveness at the agenda-setting and decision-making stages: The mediating effect of the types of government and promise
author Belchior, A. M.
author_facet Belchior, A. M.
Lopes, H.
Cabrita, L.
Tsatsanis, E.
author_role author
author2 Lopes, H.
Cabrita, L.
Tsatsanis, E.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Belchior, A. M.
Lopes, H.
Cabrita, L.
Tsatsanis, E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agenda-setting
Decision-making
Political parties
Public opinion
Responsiveness
topic Agenda-setting
Decision-making
Political parties
Public opinion
Responsiveness
description To what extent are political parties responsive to voters before and after elections (that is, in campaign and in office)? And what explains responsiveness at both these stages: the agenda-setting and the decision-making stages? We argue that parties are more responsive at the agenda-setting stage than at the decision-making, and that responsiveness tends to be mediated by the type of promise (change versus status quo, and issue salience), and of governments (majority versus minority, and left versus right-wing). This research focuses on the Portuguese case using data from party manifestos between 1995 and 2015, as well as surveys of Portuguese citizens. Findings generally support our expectations, although with some differences between parties as a whole and governments. Our results have important implications for the understanding of the opinion-policy linkage and mandate-responsiveness, as well as more broadly of party competition.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-13T10:12:09Z
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
2023
2023-12-13T10:11:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29990
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29990
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0192-5121
10.1177/01925121231155140
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136434229084160