Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32101 |
Resumo: | The Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire (SWBQ) was widely studied as a psychological instrument; yet, there is a lack of its use in non-religious research. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the SWBQ in a sample of practising believers, non-practising believers, sceptics and atheists. A total number of 279 participants aged between 17 and 69 (M=24.42, SD=9.463) completed the SWBQ and socio-demographic measurements. The SWBQ’s factorial structure proved to be different from the original version, suggesting inconsistencies between content validity and factorial validity. Environmental Domain was the factor with the greatest statistical weight in the scale's total variance. SWBQ’s metrical properties are contrary to a synergic spirituality. |
id |
RCAP_f6433c45cf95ef8be1cbd1318ebf5f0e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/32101 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believersSpiritual Well-beingQuestionnaireScaleReligiousnessPsychologyThe Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire (SWBQ) was widely studied as a psychological instrument; yet, there is a lack of its use in non-religious research. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the SWBQ in a sample of practising believers, non-practising believers, sceptics and atheists. A total number of 279 participants aged between 17 and 69 (M=24.42, SD=9.463) completed the SWBQ and socio-demographic measurements. The SWBQ’s factorial structure proved to be different from the original version, suggesting inconsistencies between content validity and factorial validity. Environmental Domain was the factor with the greatest statistical weight in the scale's total variance. SWBQ’s metrical properties are contrary to a synergic spirituality.South-West University "Neofit Rilski"2021-09-13T09:22:25Z2020-01-01T00:00:00Z2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/32101eng2193-728110.37708/psyct.v13i1.409Silva, João P. daPereira, Anabela M. S.Monteiro, Sara O. M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:01:39Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/32101Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:03:44.708091Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers |
title |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers |
spellingShingle |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers Silva, João P. da Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire Scale Religiousness Psychology |
title_short |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers |
title_full |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers |
title_fullStr |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers |
title_sort |
Spirituality or socio-ecology? – Study of the psychometric properties of spiritual well being questionnaire in an eclectic sample of believers |
author |
Silva, João P. da |
author_facet |
Silva, João P. da Pereira, Anabela M. S. Monteiro, Sara O. M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Anabela M. S. Monteiro, Sara O. M. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, João P. da Pereira, Anabela M. S. Monteiro, Sara O. M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire Scale Religiousness Psychology |
topic |
Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire Scale Religiousness Psychology |
description |
The Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire (SWBQ) was widely studied as a psychological instrument; yet, there is a lack of its use in non-religious research. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the SWBQ in a sample of practising believers, non-practising believers, sceptics and atheists. A total number of 279 participants aged between 17 and 69 (M=24.42, SD=9.463) completed the SWBQ and socio-demographic measurements. The SWBQ’s factorial structure proved to be different from the original version, suggesting inconsistencies between content validity and factorial validity. Environmental Domain was the factor with the greatest statistical weight in the scale's total variance. SWBQ’s metrical properties are contrary to a synergic spirituality. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z 2020 2021-09-13T09:22:25Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32101 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32101 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2193-7281 10.37708/psyct.v13i1.409 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
South-West University "Neofit Rilski" |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
South-West University "Neofit Rilski" |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137692676521984 |