The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361 |
Resumo: | This article explores a frequent albeit rarely discussed issue in judicial research: the challenges of doing qualitative research in which the researcher is an insider, that is, when he investigates the institution in which he works. This article reflects on methodological and ethical strategies aimed at overcoming biases in native qualitative researches, in order to provide researchers with tools to produce more reliable research in the future. The study explores four research strategies adopted in the author’s doctoral thesis: reflexivity, which means reflecting about how one’s epistemological position affects the collection of data and its results; triangulation, which is related to collection of data in different sources and different levels of analysis; case selection through transparent criteria that include negative or dissonant cases that contradict the author’s initial research hypothesis; and, finally, the adoption of ethical concerns, such as anonymity, respondent validation and the approval of the research project in the Ethics Committee. |
id |
RPED-1_40c4af88b5ae6210a7f0c4568ac457fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/361 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they workOs desafios do pesquisador nativo: reflexividade, triangulação e questões éticas em pesquisas qualitativas que envolvem o local de trabalho do pesquisadorThis article explores a frequent albeit rarely discussed issue in judicial research: the challenges of doing qualitative research in which the researcher is an insider, that is, when he investigates the institution in which he works. This article reflects on methodological and ethical strategies aimed at overcoming biases in native qualitative researches, in order to provide researchers with tools to produce more reliable research in the future. The study explores four research strategies adopted in the author’s doctoral thesis: reflexivity, which means reflecting about how one’s epistemological position affects the collection of data and its results; triangulation, which is related to collection of data in different sources and different levels of analysis; case selection through transparent criteria that include negative or dissonant cases that contradict the author’s initial research hypothesis; and, finally, the adoption of ethical concerns, such as anonymity, respondent validation and the approval of the research project in the Ethics Committee.Este artigo explora uma situação frequente, porém pouco debatida em pesquisas jurídicas: os desafios metodológicos e éticos da realização de pesquisas nativas, em que o pesquisador trabalha profissionalmente na instituição que estuda. O objetivo do artigo é explorar as estratégias metodológicas e éticas adotadas na tese de doutorado do autor para superar vieses de pesquisas nativas qualitativas, com a finalidade de contribuir para que futuras pesquisas feitas por insiders obtenham resultados mais confiáveis. O artigo demonstra quatro estratégias utilizadas na pesquisa de campo realizada pelo autor em seu ambiente de trabalho: a reflexividade, que envolve a compreensão e reflexão sobre o próprio posicionamento epistemológico e a sua influência na coleta de dados de pesquisa; a triangulação, que diz respeito à coleta de dados em fontes diversas de diferentes níveis de análise; a adoção de critérios para seleção de casos de estudo de forma transparente e que envolva o enfrentamento de casos dissonantes, isto é, casos que não se enquadram na hipótese de pesquisa preliminar do autor; e, por fim, a adoção de cuidados éticos, tais como o anonimato, a validação do respondente e a aprovação de projeto de pesquisa no Comitê de Ética em PesquisaRede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/36110.19092/reed.v6i2.361Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 2 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v6i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361/218Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha Filho, Marcio2020-07-05T16:21:52Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/361Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:21:52Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work Os desafios do pesquisador nativo: reflexividade, triangulação e questões éticas em pesquisas qualitativas que envolvem o local de trabalho do pesquisador |
title |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work |
spellingShingle |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work Cunha Filho, Marcio |
title_short |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work |
title_full |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work |
title_fullStr |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work |
title_full_unstemmed |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work |
title_sort |
The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work |
author |
Cunha Filho, Marcio |
author_facet |
Cunha Filho, Marcio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha Filho, Marcio |
description |
This article explores a frequent albeit rarely discussed issue in judicial research: the challenges of doing qualitative research in which the researcher is an insider, that is, when he investigates the institution in which he works. This article reflects on methodological and ethical strategies aimed at overcoming biases in native qualitative researches, in order to provide researchers with tools to produce more reliable research in the future. The study explores four research strategies adopted in the author’s doctoral thesis: reflexivity, which means reflecting about how one’s epistemological position affects the collection of data and its results; triangulation, which is related to collection of data in different sources and different levels of analysis; case selection through transparent criteria that include negative or dissonant cases that contradict the author’s initial research hypothesis; and, finally, the adoption of ethical concerns, such as anonymity, respondent validation and the approval of the research project in the Ethics Committee. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361 10.19092/reed.v6i2.361 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v6i2.361 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361/218 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 2 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v6i2 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703560409088 |