Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213
Resumo: Since 1934, the Federal Senate of Brazil has exclusively the competence to stop the application of a law declared unconstitutional by final decision of the Federal Supreme Court. The Constitution of Brazil of 1988 provides this mechanism in a different judicial review system from that of its conception, which makes it difficult to understand some aspects of the institute. The purpose of this article is to analyze the behavior of Federal Supreme Court and the Federal Senate between October 1988 and November 2016, based on a documentary survey of all communications between these institutions. In addition, theoretical research was undertaken to clarify dogmatic questions left open by the constitutional text.
id RPED-1_ca52f6e165b9301e6a454e57e35550b6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/213
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988Suspensão da execução de lei declarada inconstitucional: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal e Senado no período pós-1988Since 1934, the Federal Senate of Brazil has exclusively the competence to stop the application of a law declared unconstitutional by final decision of the Federal Supreme Court. The Constitution of Brazil of 1988 provides this mechanism in a different judicial review system from that of its conception, which makes it difficult to understand some aspects of the institute. The purpose of this article is to analyze the behavior of Federal Supreme Court and the Federal Senate between October 1988 and November 2016, based on a documentary survey of all communications between these institutions. In addition, theoretical research was undertaken to clarify dogmatic questions left open by the constitutional text.O sistema brasileiro de controle de constitucionalidade comporta desde 1934 um mecanismo segundo o qual cabe ao Senado suspender a execução de lei declarada inconstitucional por decisão definitiva do Supremo Tribunal Federal. A Constituição de 1988 prevê esse mecanismo mesmo em um cenário diverso do de sua concepção, o que dificulta a compreensão de vários aspectos do instituto. O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar o comportamento de Supremo Tribunal Federal e Senado na matéria no período que vai de outubro de 1988 a novembro de 2016, a partir de um levantamento documental de todas as comunicações entre as instituições no período mencionado. Além disso, empreendeu-se investigação teórica para esclarecer questões dogmáticas deixadas em aberto pela redação do texto constitucional.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/21310.19092/reed.v6i2.213Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 2 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v6i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213/227Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo2020-07-05T16:21:52Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/213Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:21:52Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
Suspensão da execução de lei declarada inconstitucional: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal e Senado no período pós-1988
title Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
spellingShingle Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo
title_short Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
title_full Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
title_fullStr Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
title_full_unstemmed Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
title_sort Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
author Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo
author_facet Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo
description Since 1934, the Federal Senate of Brazil has exclusively the competence to stop the application of a law declared unconstitutional by final decision of the Federal Supreme Court. The Constitution of Brazil of 1988 provides this mechanism in a different judicial review system from that of its conception, which makes it difficult to understand some aspects of the institute. The purpose of this article is to analyze the behavior of Federal Supreme Court and the Federal Senate between October 1988 and November 2016, based on a documentary survey of all communications between these institutions. In addition, theoretical research was undertaken to clarify dogmatic questions left open by the constitutional text.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213
10.19092/reed.v6i2.213
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v6i2.213
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213/227
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 2 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v6i2
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138703152513024