Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213 |
Resumo: | Since 1934, the Federal Senate of Brazil has exclusively the competence to stop the application of a law declared unconstitutional by final decision of the Federal Supreme Court. The Constitution of Brazil of 1988 provides this mechanism in a different judicial review system from that of its conception, which makes it difficult to understand some aspects of the institute. The purpose of this article is to analyze the behavior of Federal Supreme Court and the Federal Senate between October 1988 and November 2016, based on a documentary survey of all communications between these institutions. In addition, theoretical research was undertaken to clarify dogmatic questions left open by the constitutional text. |
id |
RPED-1_ca52f6e165b9301e6a454e57e35550b6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/213 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988Suspensão da execução de lei declarada inconstitucional: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal e Senado no período pós-1988Since 1934, the Federal Senate of Brazil has exclusively the competence to stop the application of a law declared unconstitutional by final decision of the Federal Supreme Court. The Constitution of Brazil of 1988 provides this mechanism in a different judicial review system from that of its conception, which makes it difficult to understand some aspects of the institute. The purpose of this article is to analyze the behavior of Federal Supreme Court and the Federal Senate between October 1988 and November 2016, based on a documentary survey of all communications between these institutions. In addition, theoretical research was undertaken to clarify dogmatic questions left open by the constitutional text.O sistema brasileiro de controle de constitucionalidade comporta desde 1934 um mecanismo segundo o qual cabe ao Senado suspender a execução de lei declarada inconstitucional por decisão definitiva do Supremo Tribunal Federal. A Constituição de 1988 prevê esse mecanismo mesmo em um cenário diverso do de sua concepção, o que dificulta a compreensão de vários aspectos do instituto. O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar o comportamento de Supremo Tribunal Federal e Senado na matéria no período que vai de outubro de 1988 a novembro de 2016, a partir de um levantamento documental de todas as comunicações entre as instituições no período mencionado. Além disso, empreendeu-se investigação teórica para esclarecer questões dogmáticas deixadas em aberto pela redação do texto constitucional.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/21310.19092/reed.v6i2.213Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 2 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v6i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213/227Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo2020-07-05T16:21:52Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/213Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:21:52Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988 Suspensão da execução de lei declarada inconstitucional: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal e Senado no período pós-1988 |
title |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988 |
spellingShingle |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988 Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo |
title_short |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988 |
title_full |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988 |
title_fullStr |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988 |
title_sort |
Stop of application of a law declared unconstitutional: analysis of the brazilian Federal Supreme Court and Federal Senate behavious after 1988 |
author |
Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo |
author_facet |
Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reichmann Seixas, Antonio Eduardo |
description |
Since 1934, the Federal Senate of Brazil has exclusively the competence to stop the application of a law declared unconstitutional by final decision of the Federal Supreme Court. The Constitution of Brazil of 1988 provides this mechanism in a different judicial review system from that of its conception, which makes it difficult to understand some aspects of the institute. The purpose of this article is to analyze the behavior of Federal Supreme Court and the Federal Senate between October 1988 and November 2016, based on a documentary survey of all communications between these institutions. In addition, theoretical research was undertaken to clarify dogmatic questions left open by the constitutional text. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213 10.19092/reed.v6i2.213 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v6i2.213 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/213/227 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 2 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v6i2 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703152513024 |