Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas,Anderson
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Maciel,Rafael Almeida, Lima,Renato De Almeida, Souto,Diogo Ranier De Macedo, Ferrer,Marcelo De Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522014000500264
Resumo: Objective: To analyze statistically results in biomechanical testing of fixation of femoral neck Pauwels type III fractures, on synthetic bone, with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and control group.Methods: Ten synthetic bones of a national brand were used. Test Group: fixation was performed after osteotomy at 70o tilt using DCS plate with four holes. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm displacement and rotational deviation (Step 1) and with10 mm (Step 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred.Results: The values of the test group in Step 1 showed a mean of 974N and SD = 114N. In Stage 2, we obtained on average 1335N and SD = 98N. The values in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N, respectively. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of the maximum force (N) between the test group and the control, in Step 2, demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the DCS and control plates (p = 0.91).Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the DCS boards and the control group exposed to full resistance. Level of Evidence III, Case Control.
id SBOT-1_a950dbbabeeb7aa1d695874bd2fc825f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-78522014000500264
network_acronym_str SBOT-1
network_name_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic boneFemoral neck fracturesBiomechanical phenomenaInternal fixatorsObjective: To analyze statistically results in biomechanical testing of fixation of femoral neck Pauwels type III fractures, on synthetic bone, with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and control group.Methods: Ten synthetic bones of a national brand were used. Test Group: fixation was performed after osteotomy at 70o tilt using DCS plate with four holes. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm displacement and rotational deviation (Step 1) and with10 mm (Step 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred.Results: The values of the test group in Step 1 showed a mean of 974N and SD = 114N. In Stage 2, we obtained on average 1335N and SD = 98N. The values in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N, respectively. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of the maximum force (N) between the test group and the control, in Step 2, demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the DCS and control plates (p = 0.91).Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the DCS boards and the control group exposed to full resistance. Level of Evidence III, Case Control.ATHA EDITORA2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522014000500264Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.22 n.5 2014reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1590/1413-78522014220500922info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas,AndersonMaciel,Rafael AlmeidaLima,Renato De AlmeidaSouto,Diogo Ranier De MacedoFerrer,Marcelo De Almeidaeng2015-11-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-78522014000500264Revistahttp://www.actaortopedica.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br1809-44061413-7852opendoar:2015-11-03T00:00Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
spellingShingle Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
Freitas,Anderson
Femoral neck fractures
Biomechanical phenomena
Internal fixators
title_short Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_full Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_fullStr Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_sort Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
author Freitas,Anderson
author_facet Freitas,Anderson
Maciel,Rafael Almeida
Lima,Renato De Almeida
Souto,Diogo Ranier De Macedo
Ferrer,Marcelo De Almeida
author_role author
author2 Maciel,Rafael Almeida
Lima,Renato De Almeida
Souto,Diogo Ranier De Macedo
Ferrer,Marcelo De Almeida
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas,Anderson
Maciel,Rafael Almeida
Lima,Renato De Almeida
Souto,Diogo Ranier De Macedo
Ferrer,Marcelo De Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Femoral neck fractures
Biomechanical phenomena
Internal fixators
topic Femoral neck fractures
Biomechanical phenomena
Internal fixators
description Objective: To analyze statistically results in biomechanical testing of fixation of femoral neck Pauwels type III fractures, on synthetic bone, with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and control group.Methods: Ten synthetic bones of a national brand were used. Test Group: fixation was performed after osteotomy at 70o tilt using DCS plate with four holes. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm displacement and rotational deviation (Step 1) and with10 mm (Step 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred.Results: The values of the test group in Step 1 showed a mean of 974N and SD = 114N. In Stage 2, we obtained on average 1335N and SD = 98N. The values in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N, respectively. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of the maximum force (N) between the test group and the control, in Step 2, demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the DCS and control plates (p = 0.91).Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the DCS boards and the control group exposed to full resistance. Level of Evidence III, Case Control.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522014000500264
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522014000500264
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-78522014220500922
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.22 n.5 2014
reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv 1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752122275083059200