SCHOOL EDUCATION OF ADOLESCENTS WHO HAVE SERVED A SOCIO-EDUCATIONAL MEASURE IN DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY: PATHS AND DETOURS (2016-2019)

• Autor(a) principal: Paulo, Hugo Barbosa de
• Data de Publicação: 2024
• Outros Autores: Meira, José Normando Gonçalves
• Tipo de documento: preprint
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
• Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/8355
• topic: educação escolar; medida socioeducativa; adolescentes e jovens; reincidência; resolução no. 03 de 13 de maio de 2016; school education; socio-educational measure; adolescents and young people; recidivism; resolution No. 03 of May 13, 2016; educación escolar; medida socioeducativa; adolescentes y jóvenes; reincidência; resolución N° 03 del 13 de mayo de 2016

This  study proposes, based on school enrollment, to identify whether there was recidivism in the commission of an infraction by adolescents and young people who served a socio-educational detention measure in a Socio-Educational Unit in Montes Claros-MG. To this end, historical research was carried out, through a documentary survey and data from the Minas Gerais Education System (SIMADE) (school transfer verification) and consultation of sources from the State School of Elementary and Secondary Education (2016 to 2019), duly substantiated by bibliographical research. Once the data had been analyzed, a semi-structured interview was conducted with adolescents and young offenders from the socio-educational system in the city of Montes Claros-MG. From the data collected from SIMADE, it can be seen that between 2016 and 2019, 431 adolescents were enrolled in the school that operates within the Montes Claros Socio-Educational Unit. It can also be seen that 150 adolescents were in the 6th grade of elementary school (34.80%), with a dysfunction between their age and the grade they were in at the time of admission. From the adolescents' speeches, it can be seen that the schools in the regular education system have failed to comply with Resolution no. 03 of May 13, 2016, by refusing to enroll those who have left the socio-educational system. The Undersecretary for Socio-Educational Measures must articulate with the State Department of Education to ensure that those who have left the system are taken into regular schools after their socio-educational internment measure is lifted.