EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves da Cruz, Maria de Lourdes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Lopes, Fernanda Rademacher Giovanoni, Leopoldino, Sâmella Karine de Macêdo, Lira, Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme
Texto Completo: https://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/1293
Resumo: Objective: This study aimed to synthesize the knowledge produced in the literature about the instruments used to measure diagnostic reasoning in nursing. Method: An integrative literature review was conducted in September 2020. The data sources consulted were Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Scopus Content Overview, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, and Web of Science. Nine articles were selected to compose the sample. Regarding the included studies, all were international (100%) and 44.4% were from the year 2019. The main designs were descriptive, prospective, cross-sectional, and randomized clinical trial. Results: The instruments identified were Script Concordance Test (SCTs); Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT); Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR); Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI); Nursing Process Skills Checklist; Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory - Chinese version (CTDI-CV); True or False and Multiple Choice Test; and Virtual Simulation Game. We conclude that there are several instruments to measure diagnostic reasoning in nursing. Conclusion: Knowledge of these instruments is of utmost importance to evaluate and direct the teaching of this important stage of the nursing process.
id SOBENFE-1_6ea783d5c6da8a722ff5d09e4298fc30
oai_identifier_str oai:revistae_ojs.revistaenfermagematual.a2hosted.com:article/1293
network_acronym_str SOBENFE-1
network_name_str Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme
repository_id_str
spelling EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURETECNOLOGÍAS EDUCATIVAS EN LA ENSEÑANZA DEL RAZONAMIENTO DIAGNÓSTICO EN ENFERMERÍA:: UNA REVISIÓN DE LA LITERATURATECNOLOGIAS EDUCACIONAIS NO ENSINO DO RACIOCÍNIO DIAGNÓSTICO EM ENFERMAGEM:: UMA REVISÃO DA LITERATURAEducação em EnfermagemEnsinoDiagnóstico de EnfermagemTecnologia EducacionalEducation, NursingTeachingNursing DiagnosisEducational TechnologiesEducación en EnfermeríaEnseñanzaDiagnóstico de EnfermeríaTecnología EducacionalObjective: This study aimed to synthesize the knowledge produced in the literature about the instruments used to measure diagnostic reasoning in nursing. Method: An integrative literature review was conducted in September 2020. The data sources consulted were Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Scopus Content Overview, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, and Web of Science. Nine articles were selected to compose the sample. Regarding the included studies, all were international (100%) and 44.4% were from the year 2019. The main designs were descriptive, prospective, cross-sectional, and randomized clinical trial. Results: The instruments identified were Script Concordance Test (SCTs); Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT); Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR); Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI); Nursing Process Skills Checklist; Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory - Chinese version (CTDI-CV); True or False and Multiple Choice Test; and Virtual Simulation Game. We conclude that there are several instruments to measure diagnostic reasoning in nursing. Conclusion: Knowledge of these instruments is of utmost importance to evaluate and direct the teaching of this important stage of the nursing process.Objetivo: O presente estudo objetivou sintetizar o conhecimento produzido na literatura sobre os instrumentos utilizados para medir o raciocínio diagnóstico em enfermagem. Método: Realizou-se uma revisão integrativa da literatura, em setembro de 2020, as fontes de dados consultadas foram Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Scopus Content Overview, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed e Web of Science. Foram selecionados nove artigos para compor a amostra. Em relação aos estudos incluídos, todos eram internacionais (100%) e 44,4% foram do ano de 2019. Os principais delineamentos foram descritivo, prospectivo, transversal e ensaio clínico randomizado. Resultados: Os instrumentos identificados foram: Teste de Concordância de Script (SCTs); Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT); Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR); Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI); Nursing Process Skills Checklist; Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory - versão chinesa (CTDI-CV); Teste verdadeiro ou falso e de múltipla escolha; e Jogo de Simulação Virtual. Conclui-se que existem vários instrumentos para medir o raciocínio diagnóstico em enfermagem. Conclusão: O conhecimento desses instrumentos é de suma importância para avaliar e direcionar o ensino dessa importante etapa do processo de enfermagem.SOBENFeE2022-02-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/plainhttps://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/129310.31011/reaid-2022-v.96-n.37-art.1293Journal Enfermagem Atual In Derme; Vol. 96 No. 37 (2022): Jan. Fev. Mar.; e-021210Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme; v. 96 n. 37 (2022): Jan. Fev. Mar.; e-0212102447-2034reponame:Revista Enfermagem Atual In Dermeinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Enfermagem em Feridas e Estética (SOBENFeE)instacron:SOBENFeEporhttps://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/1293/1269https://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/1293/1270Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Enfermagem Atual In Dermeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves da Cruz, Maria de LourdesLopes, Fernanda Rademacher GiovanoniLeopoldino, Sâmella Karine de MacêdoLira, Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho2023-12-26T12:52:48Zoai:revistae_ojs.revistaenfermagematual.a2hosted.com:article/1293Revistahttps://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/indexONGhttps://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/oaikatia.simoes@gmail.com || contato@revistaenfermagematual.com.br2447-20342447-2034opendoar:2023-12-26T12:52:48Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme - Sociedade Brasileira de Enfermagem em Feridas e Estética (SOBENFeE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
TECNOLOGÍAS EDUCATIVAS EN LA ENSEÑANZA DEL RAZONAMIENTO DIAGNÓSTICO EN ENFERMERÍA:: UNA REVISIÓN DE LA LITERATURA
TECNOLOGIAS EDUCACIONAIS NO ENSINO DO RACIOCÍNIO DIAGNÓSTICO EM ENFERMAGEM:: UMA REVISÃO DA LITERATURA
title EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
spellingShingle EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
Alves da Cruz, Maria de Lourdes
Educação em Enfermagem
Ensino
Diagnóstico de Enfermagem
Tecnologia Educacional
Education, Nursing
Teaching
Nursing Diagnosis
Educational Technologies
Educación en Enfermería
Enseñanza
Diagnóstico de Enfermería
Tecnología Educacional
title_short EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
title_full EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
title_fullStr EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
title_full_unstemmed EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
title_sort EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN NURSING:: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
author Alves da Cruz, Maria de Lourdes
author_facet Alves da Cruz, Maria de Lourdes
Lopes, Fernanda Rademacher Giovanoni
Leopoldino, Sâmella Karine de Macêdo
Lira, Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Lopes, Fernanda Rademacher Giovanoni
Leopoldino, Sâmella Karine de Macêdo
Lira, Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves da Cruz, Maria de Lourdes
Lopes, Fernanda Rademacher Giovanoni
Leopoldino, Sâmella Karine de Macêdo
Lira, Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educação em Enfermagem
Ensino
Diagnóstico de Enfermagem
Tecnologia Educacional
Education, Nursing
Teaching
Nursing Diagnosis
Educational Technologies
Educación en Enfermería
Enseñanza
Diagnóstico de Enfermería
Tecnología Educacional
topic Educação em Enfermagem
Ensino
Diagnóstico de Enfermagem
Tecnologia Educacional
Education, Nursing
Teaching
Nursing Diagnosis
Educational Technologies
Educación en Enfermería
Enseñanza
Diagnóstico de Enfermería
Tecnología Educacional
description Objective: This study aimed to synthesize the knowledge produced in the literature about the instruments used to measure diagnostic reasoning in nursing. Method: An integrative literature review was conducted in September 2020. The data sources consulted were Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Scopus Content Overview, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, and Web of Science. Nine articles were selected to compose the sample. Regarding the included studies, all were international (100%) and 44.4% were from the year 2019. The main designs were descriptive, prospective, cross-sectional, and randomized clinical trial. Results: The instruments identified were Script Concordance Test (SCTs); Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT); Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR); Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI); Nursing Process Skills Checklist; Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory - Chinese version (CTDI-CV); True or False and Multiple Choice Test; and Virtual Simulation Game. We conclude that there are several instruments to measure diagnostic reasoning in nursing. Conclusion: Knowledge of these instruments is of utmost importance to evaluate and direct the teaching of this important stage of the nursing process.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/1293
10.31011/reaid-2022-v.96-n.37-art.1293
url https://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/1293
identifier_str_mv 10.31011/reaid-2022-v.96-n.37-art.1293
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/1293/1269
https://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/1293/1270
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/plain
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SOBENFeE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SOBENFeE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal Enfermagem Atual In Derme; Vol. 96 No. 37 (2022): Jan. Fev. Mar.; e-021210
Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme; v. 96 n. 37 (2022): Jan. Fev. Mar.; e-021210
2447-2034
reponame:Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Enfermagem em Feridas e Estética (SOBENFeE)
instacron:SOBENFeE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Enfermagem em Feridas e Estética (SOBENFeE)
instacron_str SOBENFeE
institution SOBENFeE
reponame_str Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme
collection Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme - Sociedade Brasileira de Enfermagem em Feridas e Estética (SOBENFeE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv katia.simoes@gmail.com || contato@revistaenfermagematual.com.br
_version_ 1796797519389261824

Registros relacionados