Gest??o de riscos no processo de contrata????o da instru????o normativa 04 da SLTI/MPOG

• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Guilherme Antonio de Sousa
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
• Texto Completo: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2002
• topic: Gest??o do Conhecimento; Tecnologia da Informa????o; Processo de Contrata????o de TI; Gest??o de Riscos; CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAO

Since 2008, the Normative SLTI n?? 04 (IN4) has been established as the legal instrument for planning and supporting the procurement process of Information Technology (IT) solutions. Risk Management, which is a mandatory phase in IN4, seeks to ensure that the inherent risks in this process are mitigated. However, recent surveys from supervisory and control agencies have indicated a low maturity in this practice. This work collected the perception of managers involved in IT procurement regarding the compliance to the procurement risk management process according to the Supplementary Normative DSIC n?? 04 (NC4). For this purpose, an online survey was conducted through a questionnaire containing 33 questions, which were answered by 35 managers of 15 organizations. Completed this phase, the analysis of the results was made and 93% of respondents reported adhering to IN4, however, the survey findings contradicts this high rate, considering the results of specific assessments for each phase of risk management that did not exceeded 59% of compliance in IN4, and the phase where the estimation of the probability of risks should occur had the lowest compliance rate, only 22%. However, the main finding of this research took place in the stage that evaluated the adoption of NC4 guidelines, where only 15% of managers reported adopting it fully. These findings points out to the possible ignorance of the risks that the IT procurement process is exposed as well as the possible occurrence of frauds and the waste of public resources which, ultimately, may represent inefficiency in achieving expected results as well as possible losses to society.