Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Milagres, Stela
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Velloso, Isabela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sociedade em Debate (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3074
Resumo: The aim of the study was to understand the devices of disciplinary power in blood donation practices, in the perception of candidates for donation who have already experienced the experience of being classified as unfit. The methodology adopted was a qualitative approach was developed, whose analysis was carried out through discourse analysis (AD). Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews, with 31 candidates for repeat donation. It is in the relationship established from the binomial power / knowledge that a perceived discomfort is structured in many moments of the research: the conflict between the desire to perform blood donation, motivated by several variables and discourses and the power of the norm with its protocols, do's and sentences. It was concluded that, the relationships between candidates and professionals assume a breadth and complexity that go beyond the formally established limits, showing tensions that emerge in the interviewees' speeches.
id UCPEL-2_432324d673c815750e272a7af9618994
oai_identifier_str oai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/3074
network_acronym_str UCPEL-2
network_name_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the normPoder disciplinar nas práticas de doação de sangue: entre o desejo do doador e a normaDoação de Sangue. Doadores de Sangue. Foucault. Relações de Poder. Inaptidão.The aim of the study was to understand the devices of disciplinary power in blood donation practices, in the perception of candidates for donation who have already experienced the experience of being classified as unfit. The methodology adopted was a qualitative approach was developed, whose analysis was carried out through discourse analysis (AD). Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews, with 31 candidates for repeat donation. It is in the relationship established from the binomial power / knowledge that a perceived discomfort is structured in many moments of the research: the conflict between the desire to perform blood donation, motivated by several variables and discourses and the power of the norm with its protocols, do's and sentences. It was concluded that, the relationships between candidates and professionals assume a breadth and complexity that go beyond the formally established limits, showing tensions that emerge in the interviewees' speeches.O objetivo deste estudo foi compreender os dispositivos do poder disciplinar nas práticas de doação de sangue, na percepção de candidatos à doação que já vivenciaram a experiência de terem sido classificados como inaptos. A metodologia adotada foi de abordagem qualitativa, cuja análise se deu por meio da análise do discurso (AD). A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de entrevista semiestruturada, com 31 candidatos à doação de repetição. É na relação estabelecida a partir do binômio poder/saber que se estrutura um desconforto percebido em muitos momentos da pesquisa: o conflito entre o desejo de se realizar a doação de sangue, motivado por diversas variáveis e discursos e o poder da norma com seus protocolos, fazeres e sentenças. Concluiu-se que, as relações entre candidatos e profissionais assumem amplitude e complexidade que extrapolam os limites formalmente estabelecidos, evidenciando tensões que emergem nos discursos dos entrevistados.PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos2022-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/307410.47208/sd.v28i3.3074Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2022): Sociedade em Debate; 56-73Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2022): Sociedade em Debate; 56-73Sociedade em Debate; v. 28 n. 3 (2022): Sociedade em Debate; 56-732317-02041414-986910.47208/sd.v28i3reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)instacron:UCPELporhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3074/1916Copyright (c) 2022 Stela Milagreshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMilagres, StelaVelloso, Isabela2022-12-31T21:22:44Zoai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/3074Revistahttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsdPUBhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsd/oaiveramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br2317-02041414-9869opendoar:2022-12-31T21:22:44Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm
Poder disciplinar nas práticas de doação de sangue: entre o desejo do doador e a norma
title Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm
spellingShingle Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm
Milagres, Stela
Doação de Sangue. Doadores de Sangue. Foucault. Relações de Poder. Inaptidão.
title_short Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm
title_full Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm
title_fullStr Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm
title_full_unstemmed Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm
title_sort Power in blood donation practices: between the donor’s desire and the norm
author Milagres, Stela
author_facet Milagres, Stela
Velloso, Isabela
author_role author
author2 Velloso, Isabela
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Milagres, Stela
Velloso, Isabela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Doação de Sangue. Doadores de Sangue. Foucault. Relações de Poder. Inaptidão.
topic Doação de Sangue. Doadores de Sangue. Foucault. Relações de Poder. Inaptidão.
description The aim of the study was to understand the devices of disciplinary power in blood donation practices, in the perception of candidates for donation who have already experienced the experience of being classified as unfit. The methodology adopted was a qualitative approach was developed, whose analysis was carried out through discourse analysis (AD). Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews, with 31 candidates for repeat donation. It is in the relationship established from the binomial power / knowledge that a perceived discomfort is structured in many moments of the research: the conflict between the desire to perform blood donation, motivated by several variables and discourses and the power of the norm with its protocols, do's and sentences. It was concluded that, the relationships between candidates and professionals assume a breadth and complexity that go beyond the formally established limits, showing tensions that emerge in the interviewees' speeches.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3074
10.47208/sd.v28i3.3074
url https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3074
identifier_str_mv 10.47208/sd.v28i3.3074
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3074/1916
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Stela Milagres
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Stela Milagres
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2022): Sociedade em Debate; 56-73
Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2022): Sociedade em Debate; 56-73
Sociedade em Debate; v. 28 n. 3 (2022): Sociedade em Debate; 56-73
2317-0204
1414-9869
10.47208/sd.v28i3
reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)
instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron:UCPEL
instname_str Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron_str UCPEL
institution UCPEL
reponame_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
collection Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv veramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br
_version_ 1799304255207636992

Registros relacionados