Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to discuss the training projects in dispute in the particularity of Brazilian Social Work at the present time and their implications for the construction of relative autonomy under the terms of the political ethical project throughout graduation, in order to foster professional actions equipped with intellectuality and criticism. Methodologically, an exploratory and bibliographic study was chosen. The results point to the growth of a conservative movement based on technical and anti-intellectualist academic-professional training that, in addition to reaching the professional training project outlined by ABEPSS (1996), has changed the profile of bachelors in Social Work , tending to reduce the relative autonomy in the exercise of the profession to an allowed, encouraged and extended autonomy, provided that it is under the control of employers. |
id |
UCPEL-2_75820eadc853513049a6642954c2894f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/2727 |
network_acronym_str |
UCPEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational trainingContribuições para o debate da relativa autonomia do Serviço Social a partir da formação profissionalServiço SocialFormação ProfissionalRelativa autonomiaThe purpose of this article is to discuss the training projects in dispute in the particularity of Brazilian Social Work at the present time and their implications for the construction of relative autonomy under the terms of the political ethical project throughout graduation, in order to foster professional actions equipped with intellectuality and criticism. Methodologically, an exploratory and bibliographic study was chosen. The results point to the growth of a conservative movement based on technical and anti-intellectualist academic-professional training that, in addition to reaching the professional training project outlined by ABEPSS (1996), has changed the profile of bachelors in Social Work , tending to reduce the relative autonomy in the exercise of the profession to an allowed, encouraged and extended autonomy, provided that it is under the control of employers. A proposta deste artigo consiste em discutir os projetos de formação em disputa na particularidade do Serviço Social brasileiro nos tempos atuais e suas implicações para a construção da relativa autonomia nos termos do projeto ético político ao longo da graduação, de maneira a fomentar ações profissionais munidas de intelectualidade e criticismo. Metodologicamente, optou-se pelo estudo exploratório e de caráter bibliográfico. Os resultados apontam para o crescimento de um movimento conservador pautado em uma formação acadêmico-profissional técnica e anti-intelectualista que, além de atingir o projeto de formação profissional delineado pela ABEPSS (1996), tem alterado o perfil dos/as bacharéis em Serviço Social, tendendo a reduzir a relativa autonomia no exercício da profissão a uma autonomia permitida, incentivada e alargada, desde que sob controle dos empregadores. PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/272710.47208/sd.v26i3.2727Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 Núm. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145Sociedade em Debate; v. 26 n. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-1452317-02041414-986910.47208/sd.v26i3reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)instacron:UCPELporhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727/1727Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraes, Carla Mangueira Gonçalves https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Carlos Antonio de SouzaGonçalves, Carla Mangueira2020-12-15T20:22:25Zoai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/2727Revistahttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsdPUBhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsd/oaiveramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br2317-02041414-9869opendoar:2020-12-15T20:22:25Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training Contribuições para o debate da relativa autonomia do Serviço Social a partir da formação profissional |
title |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training |
spellingShingle |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza Serviço Social Formação Profissional Relativa autonomia |
title_short |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training |
title_full |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training |
title_fullStr |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training |
title_sort |
Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training |
author |
Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza |
author_facet |
Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza Gonçalves, Carla Mangueira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonçalves, Carla Mangueira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza Gonçalves, Carla Mangueira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Serviço Social Formação Profissional Relativa autonomia |
topic |
Serviço Social Formação Profissional Relativa autonomia |
description |
The purpose of this article is to discuss the training projects in dispute in the particularity of Brazilian Social Work at the present time and their implications for the construction of relative autonomy under the terms of the political ethical project throughout graduation, in order to foster professional actions equipped with intellectuality and criticism. Methodologically, an exploratory and bibliographic study was chosen. The results point to the growth of a conservative movement based on technical and anti-intellectualist academic-professional training that, in addition to reaching the professional training project outlined by ABEPSS (1996), has changed the profile of bachelors in Social Work , tending to reduce the relative autonomy in the exercise of the profession to an allowed, encouraged and extended autonomy, provided that it is under the control of employers. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727 10.47208/sd.v26i3.2727 |
url |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.47208/sd.v26i3.2727 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727/1727 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraes, Carla Mangueira Gonçalves https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraes, Carla Mangueira Gonçalves https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145 Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 Núm. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145 Sociedade em Debate; v. 26 n. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145 2317-0204 1414-9869 10.47208/sd.v26i3 reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online) instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) instacron:UCPEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) |
instacron_str |
UCPEL |
institution |
UCPEL |
reponame_str |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
collection |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
veramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br |
_version_ |
1799304254603657216 |