Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Gonçalves, Carla Mangueira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sociedade em Debate (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to discuss the training projects in dispute in the particularity of Brazilian Social Work at the present time and their implications for the construction of relative autonomy under the terms of the political ethical project throughout graduation, in order to foster professional actions equipped with intellectuality and criticism. Methodologically, an exploratory and bibliographic study was chosen. The results point to the growth of a conservative movement based on technical and anti-intellectualist academic-professional training that, in addition to reaching the professional training project outlined by ABEPSS (1996), has changed the profile of bachelors in Social Work , tending to reduce the relative autonomy in the exercise of the profession to an allowed, encouraged and extended autonomy, provided that it is under the control of employers.
id UCPEL-2_75820eadc853513049a6642954c2894f
oai_identifier_str oai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/2727
network_acronym_str UCPEL-2
network_name_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational trainingContribuições para o debate da relativa autonomia do Serviço Social a partir da formação profissionalServiço SocialFormação ProfissionalRelativa autonomiaThe purpose of this article is to discuss the training projects in dispute in the particularity of Brazilian Social Work at the present time and their implications for the construction of relative autonomy under the terms of the political ethical project throughout graduation, in order to foster professional actions equipped with intellectuality and criticism. Methodologically, an exploratory and bibliographic study was chosen. The results point to the growth of a conservative movement based on technical and anti-intellectualist academic-professional training that, in addition to reaching the professional training project outlined by ABEPSS (1996), has changed the profile of bachelors in Social Work , tending to reduce the relative autonomy in the exercise of the profession to an allowed, encouraged and extended autonomy, provided that it is under the control of employers. A proposta deste artigo consiste em discutir os projetos de formação em disputa na particularidade do Serviço Social brasileiro nos tempos atuais e suas implicações para a construção da relativa autonomia nos termos do projeto ético político ao longo da graduação, de maneira a fomentar ações profissionais munidas de intelectualidade e criticismo. Metodologicamente, optou-se pelo estudo exploratório e de caráter bibliográfico. Os resultados apontam para o crescimento de um movimento conservador pautado em uma formação acadêmico-profissional técnica e anti-intelectualista que, além de atingir o projeto de formação profissional delineado pela ABEPSS (1996), tem alterado o perfil dos/as bacharéis em Serviço Social, tendendo a reduzir a relativa autonomia no exercício da profissão a uma autonomia permitida, incentivada e alargada, desde que sob controle dos empregadores. PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/272710.47208/sd.v26i3.2727Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 Núm. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145Sociedade em Debate; v. 26 n. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-1452317-02041414-986910.47208/sd.v26i3reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)instacron:UCPELporhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727/1727Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraes, Carla Mangueira Gonçalves https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Carlos Antonio de SouzaGonçalves, Carla Mangueira2020-12-15T20:22:25Zoai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/2727Revistahttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsdPUBhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsd/oaiveramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br2317-02041414-9869opendoar:2020-12-15T20:22:25Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
Contribuições para o debate da relativa autonomia do Serviço Social a partir da formação profissional
title Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
spellingShingle Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza
Serviço Social
Formação Profissional
Relativa autonomia
title_short Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
title_full Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
title_fullStr Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
title_full_unstemmed Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
title_sort Contributions to the debate of the relative autonomy of social work from vocational training
author Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza
author_facet Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza
Gonçalves, Carla Mangueira
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Carla Mangueira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza
Gonçalves, Carla Mangueira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Serviço Social
Formação Profissional
Relativa autonomia
topic Serviço Social
Formação Profissional
Relativa autonomia
description The purpose of this article is to discuss the training projects in dispute in the particularity of Brazilian Social Work at the present time and their implications for the construction of relative autonomy under the terms of the political ethical project throughout graduation, in order to foster professional actions equipped with intellectuality and criticism. Methodologically, an exploratory and bibliographic study was chosen. The results point to the growth of a conservative movement based on technical and anti-intellectualist academic-professional training that, in addition to reaching the professional training project outlined by ABEPSS (1996), has changed the profile of bachelors in Social Work , tending to reduce the relative autonomy in the exercise of the profession to an allowed, encouraged and extended autonomy, provided that it is under the control of employers.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727
10.47208/sd.v26i3.2727
url https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727
identifier_str_mv 10.47208/sd.v26i3.2727
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2727/1727
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraes, Carla Mangueira Gonçalves
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraes, Carla Mangueira Gonçalves
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145
Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 Núm. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145
Sociedade em Debate; v. 26 n. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 131-145
2317-0204
1414-9869
10.47208/sd.v26i3
reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)
instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron:UCPEL
instname_str Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron_str UCPEL
institution UCPEL
reponame_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
collection Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv veramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br
_version_ 1799304254603657216

Registros relacionados