Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barros, Albani
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sociedade em Debate (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3356
Resumo: This article is to analyze the recent reality of crowdsourcing as a complex and mystifying element resulting from the relationship between capital, labor, and the intense use of informational technologies. Crowdsourcing establish a new status between outsourcing and informality. Moreover, it is a type of relationship between companies, workers, consumers, and users, in which workers no longer necessarily present themselves in the traditional molds of being hired by their employers. It is based on these considerations that this article exposes crowdsourcing as a challenge to the understanding of its possibilities and multiple forms of concretion, which surpasses rigid limits between what would be work, leisure or social interaction. The construction of this exposition was the result of bibliographical research, the systematization of Marxist categories and the contextualization of historical conditions that affect the crowdsourcing phenomenon in the dynamics of the contemporary world of work.
id UCPEL-2_7d2e49bf69e2e202d18ddbb55057de3b
oai_identifier_str oai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/3356
network_acronym_str UCPEL-2
network_name_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Crowndsorcing and labor invisibilityCrowndsorcing e a invisibilidade laboralMystification. Digital platforms. Information Technologies. Invisible precarious work.Mistificação. Plataformas digitais. Tecnologias informacionais. Trabalho precarizado invisível.This article is to analyze the recent reality of crowdsourcing as a complex and mystifying element resulting from the relationship between capital, labor, and the intense use of informational technologies. Crowdsourcing establish a new status between outsourcing and informality. Moreover, it is a type of relationship between companies, workers, consumers, and users, in which workers no longer necessarily present themselves in the traditional molds of being hired by their employers. It is based on these considerations that this article exposes crowdsourcing as a challenge to the understanding of its possibilities and multiple forms of concretion, which surpasses rigid limits between what would be work, leisure or social interaction. The construction of this exposition was the result of bibliographical research, the systematization of Marxist categories and the contextualization of historical conditions that affect the crowdsourcing phenomenon in the dynamics of the contemporary world of work.Este artigo propõe-se a analisar o recente fenômeno do crowdsourcing, enquanto um elemento complexo e mistificador, resultante da relação entre capital, trabalho e a intensa utilização de tecnologias informacionais. O crowdsourcing estabelece um novo estatuto entre a terceirização e a informalidade. Além disso, trata-se de uma modalidade de relação entre empresas, trabalhadores, consumidores e usuários, em que não mais necessariamente os trabalhadores se apresentam nos moldes tradicionais de contratados por seus empregadores. É partir dessas considerações que este artigo expõe o crowdsourcing como um desafio para compreensão de suas possiblidades e múltiplas formas de concretização, que ultrapassa limites rígidos entre o que seria trabalho, lazer ou interação social. A construção dessa exposição foi o resultado de pesquisa bibliográfica, da sistematização de categorias marxistas e da contextualização de determinantes históricos que incidem sobre o fenômeno do crowdsourcing na dinâmica do mundo do trabalho contemporâneo.PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos2023-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/335610.47208/sd.v29i3.3356Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 146-158Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 146-158Sociedade em Debate; v. 29 n. 3 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 146-1582317-02041414-986910.47208/sd.v29i3reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)instacron:UCPELporhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3356/2010Copyright (c) 2023 Albani Barroshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarros, Albani2023-12-31T14:10:42Zoai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/3356Revistahttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsdPUBhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsd/oaiveramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br2317-02041414-9869opendoar:2023-12-31T14:10:42Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility
Crowndsorcing e a invisibilidade laboral
title Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility
spellingShingle Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility
Barros, Albani
Mystification. Digital platforms. Information Technologies. Invisible precarious work.
Mistificação. Plataformas digitais. Tecnologias informacionais. Trabalho precarizado invisível.
title_short Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility
title_full Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility
title_fullStr Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility
title_full_unstemmed Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility
title_sort Crowndsorcing and labor invisibility
author Barros, Albani
author_facet Barros, Albani
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barros, Albani
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mystification. Digital platforms. Information Technologies. Invisible precarious work.
Mistificação. Plataformas digitais. Tecnologias informacionais. Trabalho precarizado invisível.
topic Mystification. Digital platforms. Information Technologies. Invisible precarious work.
Mistificação. Plataformas digitais. Tecnologias informacionais. Trabalho precarizado invisível.
description This article is to analyze the recent reality of crowdsourcing as a complex and mystifying element resulting from the relationship between capital, labor, and the intense use of informational technologies. Crowdsourcing establish a new status between outsourcing and informality. Moreover, it is a type of relationship between companies, workers, consumers, and users, in which workers no longer necessarily present themselves in the traditional molds of being hired by their employers. It is based on these considerations that this article exposes crowdsourcing as a challenge to the understanding of its possibilities and multiple forms of concretion, which surpasses rigid limits between what would be work, leisure or social interaction. The construction of this exposition was the result of bibliographical research, the systematization of Marxist categories and the contextualization of historical conditions that affect the crowdsourcing phenomenon in the dynamics of the contemporary world of work.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3356
10.47208/sd.v29i3.3356
url https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3356
identifier_str_mv 10.47208/sd.v29i3.3356
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3356/2010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Albani Barros
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Albani Barros
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 146-158
Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 146-158
Sociedade em Debate; v. 29 n. 3 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 146-158
2317-0204
1414-9869
10.47208/sd.v29i3
reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)
instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron:UCPEL
instname_str Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron_str UCPEL
institution UCPEL
reponame_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
collection Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv veramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br
_version_ 1799304255511724032