The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10879 |
Resumo: | The court injunction granted in the federal constitution of 1988 to enable the exercise of fundamental rights constitutionally defined, but hampered by the lack of a regulatory provision, it can be glimpsed as a possibility for realization of fundamental social rights whereas such rights don't have a positive act of the judiciary to promote the realization of social citizenship. It is up to the judiciary to departs from the extremely attachment to the principle of separation of powers, of its self-restriction posture and obstacles presented by budget limitations and work to promote the justiciability of fundamental social rights, so, such rights can be effected in social reality. One way to enable the realization of fundamental social rights in brazilian society is the judiciary, especially in the figure of the Supreme Court, prioritize the good management of the court injunction, enabling this constitutional remedy actually provides to your petitioner the enjoyment of right hitherto hindered by legislation omission. |
id |
UEL-2_7c83c8b7258c23ff9ac1f84e3c6c3f73 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10879 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rightsO Mandado de injunção como possibilidade de efetivação dos Direitos Fundamentais SociaisCourt injunctionSocial fundamental rightsJusticiabilityFederal court of justice.Mandado de injunçãoDireitos fundamentais sociais.Justiciabilidade. Supremo Tribunal Federal.The court injunction granted in the federal constitution of 1988 to enable the exercise of fundamental rights constitutionally defined, but hampered by the lack of a regulatory provision, it can be glimpsed as a possibility for realization of fundamental social rights whereas such rights don't have a positive act of the judiciary to promote the realization of social citizenship. It is up to the judiciary to departs from the extremely attachment to the principle of separation of powers, of its self-restriction posture and obstacles presented by budget limitations and work to promote the justiciability of fundamental social rights, so, such rights can be effected in social reality. One way to enable the realization of fundamental social rights in brazilian society is the judiciary, especially in the figure of the Supreme Court, prioritize the good management of the court injunction, enabling this constitutional remedy actually provides to your petitioner the enjoyment of right hitherto hindered by legislation omission.O mandado de injunção, concebido na Constituição Federal de 1988 para possibilitar o exercício dos direitos fundamentais constitucionalmente definidos, mas obstado pela falta de norma regulamentadora, pode ser vislumbrado como possibilidade de efetivação dos direitos fundamentais sociais, já que tais direitos carecem de um atuar positivo do Judiciário no sentido de promover a efetivação da cidadania social. Cabe ao Judiciário afastar-se do extremo apego ao princípio da separação de poderes, de sua postura de autorrestrição e dos óbices apresentados pela limitação orçamentária e trabalhar no sentido de promover a justiciabilidade dos direitos fundamentais sociais para que, assim, tais direitos possam ser efetivados na realidade social. Um dos caminhos para possibilitar que a efetivação dos direitos fundamentais sociais ocorra na sociedade brasileira é o Judiciário, especialmente na figura do Supremo Tribunal Federal, primar pelo bom manejo do mandado de injunção, possibilitando que este remédio constitucional realmente proporcione ao seu impetrante a fruição do direito até então obstaculizado pela omissão legiferante.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2009-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1087910.5433/1980-511X.2009v4n3p233Revista do Direito Público; v. 4 n. 3 (2009); 233 - 2531980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10879/9513Guellero, Camila TalhetiEsteves, João Luiz Martinsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-16T16:44:27Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10879Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2017-03-16T16:44:27Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights O Mandado de injunção como possibilidade de efetivação dos Direitos Fundamentais Sociais |
title |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights |
spellingShingle |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights Guellero, Camila Talheti Court injunction Social fundamental rights Justiciability Federal court of justice. Mandado de injunção Direitos fundamentais sociais. Justiciabilidade . Supremo Tribunal Federal. |
title_short |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights |
title_full |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights |
title_fullStr |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights |
title_sort |
The court injunction as a possibility for realization of the social fundamental rights |
author |
Guellero, Camila Talheti |
author_facet |
Guellero, Camila Talheti Esteves, João Luiz Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Esteves, João Luiz Martins |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guellero, Camila Talheti Esteves, João Luiz Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Court injunction Social fundamental rights Justiciability Federal court of justice. Mandado de injunção Direitos fundamentais sociais. Justiciabilidade . Supremo Tribunal Federal. |
topic |
Court injunction Social fundamental rights Justiciability Federal court of justice. Mandado de injunção Direitos fundamentais sociais. Justiciabilidade . Supremo Tribunal Federal. |
description |
The court injunction granted in the federal constitution of 1988 to enable the exercise of fundamental rights constitutionally defined, but hampered by the lack of a regulatory provision, it can be glimpsed as a possibility for realization of fundamental social rights whereas such rights don't have a positive act of the judiciary to promote the realization of social citizenship. It is up to the judiciary to departs from the extremely attachment to the principle of separation of powers, of its self-restriction posture and obstacles presented by budget limitations and work to promote the justiciability of fundamental social rights, so, such rights can be effected in social reality. One way to enable the realization of fundamental social rights in brazilian society is the judiciary, especially in the figure of the Supreme Court, prioritize the good management of the court injunction, enabling this constitutional remedy actually provides to your petitioner the enjoyment of right hitherto hindered by legislation omission. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10879 10.5433/1980-511X.2009v4n3p233 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10879 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2009v4n3p233 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10879/9513 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 4 n. 3 (2009); 233 - 253 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305930054041600 |