Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Érika Capella
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Nohara, Irene Patrícia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542
Resumo: The following research analyzes the inclusion of the principle of subsidiarity in the article 37 of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, as it is intended by the PEC 32/2020. The article examines this principle's meaning, as well as its consequences related to the constitutional role of the Brazilian State. Besides that, it asserts which are the backgrounds that frames the ideological discourse inclined to the subsidiarity enactment. Later on, Mariana Mazzucato’s work is used as a theoretical framework to deconstruct the false image of tactless State and to demonstrate the importance of an entrepreneurial and active State in order to develop the country. Finally, the constitutional reform limits will be analyzed, which will lead to the conclusion of the possibility to plead the unconstitutionality of the reforms that pretend to mischaracterize the leading role of the State, taking into consideration the respect to the constitutional program. 
id UEL-2_d5af9b09d011ecf24e485bbc512d188a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44542
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020Retrocessos da positivação do princípio da subsidiariedade: : a inconstitucionalidade da reforma pretendida pela PEC 32/2020Principle of subsidiarity. PEC 32/2020. Welfare State. Limits to the constitutional reform.Princípio da subsidiariedade. PEC 32/2020. Estado Social. Limites à reforma constitucional.The following research analyzes the inclusion of the principle of subsidiarity in the article 37 of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, as it is intended by the PEC 32/2020. The article examines this principle's meaning, as well as its consequences related to the constitutional role of the Brazilian State. Besides that, it asserts which are the backgrounds that frames the ideological discourse inclined to the subsidiarity enactment. Later on, Mariana Mazzucato’s work is used as a theoretical framework to deconstruct the false image of tactless State and to demonstrate the importance of an entrepreneurial and active State in order to develop the country. Finally, the constitutional reform limits will be analyzed, which will lead to the conclusion of the possibility to plead the unconstitutionality of the reforms that pretend to mischaracterize the leading role of the State, taking into consideration the respect to the constitutional program. O presente trabalho analisa a tentativa de positivação do princípio da subsidiariedade no artigo 37 da Constituição Federal, tal como pretendido pela PEC 32/2020, sendo conhecida como a proposta de Reforma Administrativa. O artigo examina o significado deste princípio, bem como suas implicações concretas em relação ao papel constitucional do Estado brasileiro. Além disso, perquire quais são os argumentos que embasam o discurso ideológico favorável à adoção da subsidiariedade. Após, utiliza como referencial teórico a obra de Mariana Mazzucato, para desconstruir a imagem falsa do Estado inábil e demonstrar a importância de um Estado ativo e empreendedor para o desenvolvimento do País. Finalmente, serão analisados os limites de reforma constitucional, concluindo-se pela possibilidade de arguir a inconstitucionalidade de reformas que pretendam descaracterizar o papel protagonista do Estado, tendo em vista a preservação e o respeito ao programa constitucional originário.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/4454210.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p219Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 3 (2023); 219-2351980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542/49841Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Érika CapellaNohara, Irene Patrícia2023-12-30T20:59:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44542Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2023-12-30T20:59:49Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
Retrocessos da positivação do princípio da subsidiariedade: : a inconstitucionalidade da reforma pretendida pela PEC 32/2020
title Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
spellingShingle Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
Fernandes, Érika Capella
Principle of subsidiarity. PEC 32/2020. Welfare State. Limits to the constitutional reform.
Princípio da subsidiariedade. PEC 32/2020. Estado Social. Limites à reforma constitucional.
title_short Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
title_full Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
title_fullStr Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
title_full_unstemmed Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
title_sort Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
author Fernandes, Érika Capella
author_facet Fernandes, Érika Capella
Nohara, Irene Patrícia
author_role author
author2 Nohara, Irene Patrícia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Érika Capella
Nohara, Irene Patrícia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Principle of subsidiarity. PEC 32/2020. Welfare State. Limits to the constitutional reform.
Princípio da subsidiariedade. PEC 32/2020. Estado Social. Limites à reforma constitucional.
topic Principle of subsidiarity. PEC 32/2020. Welfare State. Limits to the constitutional reform.
Princípio da subsidiariedade. PEC 32/2020. Estado Social. Limites à reforma constitucional.
description The following research analyzes the inclusion of the principle of subsidiarity in the article 37 of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, as it is intended by the PEC 32/2020. The article examines this principle's meaning, as well as its consequences related to the constitutional role of the Brazilian State. Besides that, it asserts which are the backgrounds that frames the ideological discourse inclined to the subsidiarity enactment. Later on, Mariana Mazzucato’s work is used as a theoretical framework to deconstruct the false image of tactless State and to demonstrate the importance of an entrepreneurial and active State in order to develop the country. Finally, the constitutional reform limits will be analyzed, which will lead to the conclusion of the possibility to plead the unconstitutionality of the reforms that pretend to mischaracterize the leading role of the State, taking into consideration the respect to the constitutional program. 
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542
10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p219
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p219
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542/49841
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 3 (2023); 219-235
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305933570965504

Registros relacionados