Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542 |
Resumo: | The following research analyzes the inclusion of the principle of subsidiarity in the article 37 of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, as it is intended by the PEC 32/2020. The article examines this principle's meaning, as well as its consequences related to the constitutional role of the Brazilian State. Besides that, it asserts which are the backgrounds that frames the ideological discourse inclined to the subsidiarity enactment. Later on, Mariana Mazzucato’s work is used as a theoretical framework to deconstruct the false image of tactless State and to demonstrate the importance of an entrepreneurial and active State in order to develop the country. Finally, the constitutional reform limits will be analyzed, which will lead to the conclusion of the possibility to plead the unconstitutionality of the reforms that pretend to mischaracterize the leading role of the State, taking into consideration the respect to the constitutional program. |
id |
UEL-2_d5af9b09d011ecf24e485bbc512d188a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44542 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020Retrocessos da positivação do princípio da subsidiariedade: : a inconstitucionalidade da reforma pretendida pela PEC 32/2020Principle of subsidiarity. PEC 32/2020. Welfare State. Limits to the constitutional reform.Princípio da subsidiariedade. PEC 32/2020. Estado Social. Limites à reforma constitucional.The following research analyzes the inclusion of the principle of subsidiarity in the article 37 of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, as it is intended by the PEC 32/2020. The article examines this principle's meaning, as well as its consequences related to the constitutional role of the Brazilian State. Besides that, it asserts which are the backgrounds that frames the ideological discourse inclined to the subsidiarity enactment. Later on, Mariana Mazzucato’s work is used as a theoretical framework to deconstruct the false image of tactless State and to demonstrate the importance of an entrepreneurial and active State in order to develop the country. Finally, the constitutional reform limits will be analyzed, which will lead to the conclusion of the possibility to plead the unconstitutionality of the reforms that pretend to mischaracterize the leading role of the State, taking into consideration the respect to the constitutional program. O presente trabalho analisa a tentativa de positivação do princípio da subsidiariedade no artigo 37 da Constituição Federal, tal como pretendido pela PEC 32/2020, sendo conhecida como a proposta de Reforma Administrativa. O artigo examina o significado deste princípio, bem como suas implicações concretas em relação ao papel constitucional do Estado brasileiro. Além disso, perquire quais são os argumentos que embasam o discurso ideológico favorável à adoção da subsidiariedade. Após, utiliza como referencial teórico a obra de Mariana Mazzucato, para desconstruir a imagem falsa do Estado inábil e demonstrar a importância de um Estado ativo e empreendedor para o desenvolvimento do País. Finalmente, serão analisados os limites de reforma constitucional, concluindo-se pela possibilidade de arguir a inconstitucionalidade de reformas que pretendam descaracterizar o papel protagonista do Estado, tendo em vista a preservação e o respeito ao programa constitucional originário.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/4454210.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p219Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 3 (2023); 219-2351980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542/49841Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Érika CapellaNohara, Irene Patrícia2023-12-30T20:59:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44542Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2023-12-30T20:59:49Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020 Retrocessos da positivação do princípio da subsidiariedade: : a inconstitucionalidade da reforma pretendida pela PEC 32/2020 |
title |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020 |
spellingShingle |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020 Fernandes, Érika Capella Principle of subsidiarity. PEC 32/2020. Welfare State. Limits to the constitutional reform. Princípio da subsidiariedade. PEC 32/2020. Estado Social. Limites à reforma constitucional. |
title_short |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020 |
title_full |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020 |
title_fullStr |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020 |
title_sort |
Some controversial aspects of the principle of subsidiarity:: the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 32/2020 |
author |
Fernandes, Érika Capella |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Érika Capella Nohara, Irene Patrícia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nohara, Irene Patrícia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Érika Capella Nohara, Irene Patrícia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Principle of subsidiarity. PEC 32/2020. Welfare State. Limits to the constitutional reform. Princípio da subsidiariedade. PEC 32/2020. Estado Social. Limites à reforma constitucional. |
topic |
Principle of subsidiarity. PEC 32/2020. Welfare State. Limits to the constitutional reform. Princípio da subsidiariedade. PEC 32/2020. Estado Social. Limites à reforma constitucional. |
description |
The following research analyzes the inclusion of the principle of subsidiarity in the article 37 of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, as it is intended by the PEC 32/2020. The article examines this principle's meaning, as well as its consequences related to the constitutional role of the Brazilian State. Besides that, it asserts which are the backgrounds that frames the ideological discourse inclined to the subsidiarity enactment. Later on, Mariana Mazzucato’s work is used as a theoretical framework to deconstruct the false image of tactless State and to demonstrate the importance of an entrepreneurial and active State in order to develop the country. Finally, the constitutional reform limits will be analyzed, which will lead to the conclusion of the possibility to plead the unconstitutionality of the reforms that pretend to mischaracterize the leading role of the State, taking into consideration the respect to the constitutional program. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542 10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p219 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p219 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/44542/49841 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 3 (2023); 219-235 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305933570965504 |