On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Blayer, Irene Maria Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2004
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/3539
Resumo:  Under the rubric of standard Weinrich (1954, p. 396) includes, among other notions, those of ‘socially acceptable’ or ‘average’ or ‘typical’. For Portuguese linguists the main criterion for a model to represent standard language has always been the speech modality of the cultured or urban people. There is no agreement, however, over whether the speech of Lisbon or that of Coimbra should set the norm. In an article reviewing the position of early Portuguese linguists regarding the interpretation of what is the Portuguese padrão (standard), Boléo (1946) expresses that Gonçalves Viana (1892) and José Pedro Machado (1940) shared the conviction that it is the speech of the cultured parlance of Lisbon that is considered as the standard, as opposed to that of Coimbra, which was the choice of Oliveira Guimarães (1927) as well as Boléo (1946, p. 11-12).
id UEL-3_39e609dfbf7822386daf78a0d8321452
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3539
network_acronym_str UEL-3
network_name_str Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
repository_id_str
spelling On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese DialectsOn Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese DialectsPortuguese linguistsPortuguese padrão (standard)Boléo. Under the rubric of standard Weinrich (1954, p. 396) includes, among other notions, those of ‘socially acceptable’ or ‘average’ or ‘typical’. For Portuguese linguists the main criterion for a model to represent standard language has always been the speech modality of the cultured or urban people. There is no agreement, however, over whether the speech of Lisbon or that of Coimbra should set the norm. In an article reviewing the position of early Portuguese linguists regarding the interpretation of what is the Portuguese padrão (standard), Boléo (1946) expresses that Gonçalves Viana (1892) and José Pedro Machado (1940) shared the conviction that it is the speech of the cultured parlance of Lisbon that is considered as the standard, as opposed to that of Coimbra, which was the choice of Oliveira Guimarães (1927) as well as Boléo (1946, p. 11-12).  Under the rubric of standard Weinrich (1954, p. 396) includes, among other notions, those of ‘socially acceptable’ or ‘average’ or ‘typical’. For Portuguese linguists the main criterion for a model to represent standard language has always been the speech modality of the cultured or urban people. There is no agreement, however, over whether the speech of Lisbon or that of Coimbra should set the norm. In an article reviewing the position of early Portuguese linguists regarding the interpretation of what is the Portuguese padrão (standard), Boléo (1946) expresses that Gonçalves Viana (1892) and José Pedro Machado (1940) shared the conviction that it is the speech of the cultured parlance of Lisbon that is considered as the standard, as opposed to that of Coimbra, which was the choice of Oliveira Guimarães (1927) as well as Boléo (1946, p. 11-12). UEL2004-07-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/353910.5433/2237-4876.2002v5n1p77Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2002): Volume Atemático; 77-106Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; v. 5 n. 1 (2002): Volume Atemático; 77-1062237-4876reponame:Signum: Estudos da Linguageminstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/3539/2861Blayer, Irene Maria Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-16T17:57:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3539Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signumPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/oai||signum@uel.br2237-48761516-3083opendoar:2022-11-16T17:57:44Signum: Estudos da Linguagem - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
title On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
spellingShingle On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
Blayer, Irene Maria Ferreira
Portuguese linguists
Portuguese padrão (standard)
Boléo.
title_short On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
title_full On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
title_fullStr On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
title_full_unstemmed On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
title_sort On Vocalic* Variations in Portuguese Dialects
author Blayer, Irene Maria Ferreira
author_facet Blayer, Irene Maria Ferreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Blayer, Irene Maria Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Portuguese linguists
Portuguese padrão (standard)
Boléo.
topic Portuguese linguists
Portuguese padrão (standard)
Boléo.
description  Under the rubric of standard Weinrich (1954, p. 396) includes, among other notions, those of ‘socially acceptable’ or ‘average’ or ‘typical’. For Portuguese linguists the main criterion for a model to represent standard language has always been the speech modality of the cultured or urban people. There is no agreement, however, over whether the speech of Lisbon or that of Coimbra should set the norm. In an article reviewing the position of early Portuguese linguists regarding the interpretation of what is the Portuguese padrão (standard), Boléo (1946) expresses that Gonçalves Viana (1892) and José Pedro Machado (1940) shared the conviction that it is the speech of the cultured parlance of Lisbon that is considered as the standard, as opposed to that of Coimbra, which was the choice of Oliveira Guimarães (1927) as well as Boléo (1946, p. 11-12).
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-07-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/3539
10.5433/2237-4876.2002v5n1p77
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/3539
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2237-4876.2002v5n1p77
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/3539/2861
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2002): Volume Atemático; 77-106
Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; v. 5 n. 1 (2002): Volume Atemático; 77-106
2237-4876
reponame:Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
collection Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Signum: Estudos da Linguagem - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||signum@uel.br
_version_ 1799305961146417152