Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crestani, Luciana Maria
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Souza, Clínio Jorge de, Neder, Cristiane Piementel, Cunha, Jaeder Fernandes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Entretextos
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569
Resumo: Most students entering superior education find difficulties concerning text interpretation. Doubts regarding thematic, the author´s point of view, and mainly the arguments the author uses to defend these points of view are common when tasks are proposed with argumentative texts. In this sense, based on propositions of Paula Carlino (2009) for teaching reading and writing in superior education (academic literacy), and the Greimas semiotic as theoretical and methodological support, this article follows the analysis of an opinion text aiming to provide methodological grants to help newcomers to graduation in working with this textual form. Differences between opinion and argument, forms of argumentation, and semantic structure of the texts are issues discussed from the text in analysis.
id UEL-5_21fa85546e2f90b71bf453d5b47d5e4a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15569
network_acronym_str UEL-5
network_name_str Revista Entretextos
repository_id_str
spelling Academic literacy: textual interpretation in questionLetramento acadêmico: interpretação textual em questãoAcademic literacyReading and text interpretationArgumentative textsLetramento acadêmicoLeitura e interpretação textualTexto argumentativoMost students entering superior education find difficulties concerning text interpretation. Doubts regarding thematic, the author´s point of view, and mainly the arguments the author uses to defend these points of view are common when tasks are proposed with argumentative texts. In this sense, based on propositions of Paula Carlino (2009) for teaching reading and writing in superior education (academic literacy), and the Greimas semiotic as theoretical and methodological support, this article follows the analysis of an opinion text aiming to provide methodological grants to help newcomers to graduation in working with this textual form. Differences between opinion and argument, forms of argumentation, and semantic structure of the texts are issues discussed from the text in analysis.A maioria dos alunos ingressantes no nível de ensino superior encontra dificuldades relacionadas à interpretação textual. Dúvidas em relação à temática, ao ponto de vista que o autor assume e principalmente aos argumentos que o autor utiliza para defender seu ponto de vista são comuns quando se propõem tarefas com textos argumentativos. Nesse sentido, tomando como base propostas de Paula Carlino (2009) para o ensino da leitura e da escrita no nível superior (letramento acadêmico), e tendo como aporte teórico-metodológico a semiótica greimasiana, neste artigo procede-se à análise de um texto de opinião no intuito de fornecer subsídios metodológicos que auxiliem alunos recém-chegados à graduação no trabalho com essa modalidade textual. Diferença entre opinião e argumento, formas de argumentação, e organização semântica dos textos são questões discutidas a partir do texto em análise.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2014-10-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/1556910.5433/1519-5392.2014v14n1p100Entretextos; v. 14 n. 1 (2014); 100-1182764-08091519-5392reponame:Revista Entretextosinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569/15202Copyright (c) 2014 Entretextosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrestani, Luciana MariaSouza, Clínio Jorge deNeder, Cristiane PiementelCunha, Jaeder Fernandes2021-04-27T19:34:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15569Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextosPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/oai||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br1519-53922764-0809opendoar:2021-04-27T19:34:43Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
Letramento acadêmico: interpretação textual em questão
title Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
spellingShingle Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
Crestani, Luciana Maria
Academic literacy
Reading and text interpretation
Argumentative texts
Letramento acadêmico
Leitura e interpretação textual
Texto argumentativo
title_short Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
title_full Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
title_fullStr Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
title_full_unstemmed Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
title_sort Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
author Crestani, Luciana Maria
author_facet Crestani, Luciana Maria
Souza, Clínio Jorge de
Neder, Cristiane Piementel
Cunha, Jaeder Fernandes
author_role author
author2 Souza, Clínio Jorge de
Neder, Cristiane Piementel
Cunha, Jaeder Fernandes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crestani, Luciana Maria
Souza, Clínio Jorge de
Neder, Cristiane Piementel
Cunha, Jaeder Fernandes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Academic literacy
Reading and text interpretation
Argumentative texts
Letramento acadêmico
Leitura e interpretação textual
Texto argumentativo
topic Academic literacy
Reading and text interpretation
Argumentative texts
Letramento acadêmico
Leitura e interpretação textual
Texto argumentativo
description Most students entering superior education find difficulties concerning text interpretation. Doubts regarding thematic, the author´s point of view, and mainly the arguments the author uses to defend these points of view are common when tasks are proposed with argumentative texts. In this sense, based on propositions of Paula Carlino (2009) for teaching reading and writing in superior education (academic literacy), and the Greimas semiotic as theoretical and methodological support, this article follows the analysis of an opinion text aiming to provide methodological grants to help newcomers to graduation in working with this textual form. Differences between opinion and argument, forms of argumentation, and semantic structure of the texts are issues discussed from the text in analysis.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569
10.5433/1519-5392.2014v14n1p100
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1519-5392.2014v14n1p100
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569/15202
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Entretextos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Entretextos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Entretextos; v. 14 n. 1 (2014); 100-118
2764-0809
1519-5392
reponame:Revista Entretextos
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista Entretextos
collection Revista Entretextos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br
_version_ 1799315388350070784

Registros relacionados