Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Entretextos |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569 |
Resumo: | Most students entering superior education find difficulties concerning text interpretation. Doubts regarding thematic, the author´s point of view, and mainly the arguments the author uses to defend these points of view are common when tasks are proposed with argumentative texts. In this sense, based on propositions of Paula Carlino (2009) for teaching reading and writing in superior education (academic literacy), and the Greimas semiotic as theoretical and methodological support, this article follows the analysis of an opinion text aiming to provide methodological grants to help newcomers to graduation in working with this textual form. Differences between opinion and argument, forms of argumentation, and semantic structure of the texts are issues discussed from the text in analysis. |
id |
UEL-5_21fa85546e2f90b71bf453d5b47d5e4a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15569 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-5 |
network_name_str |
Revista Entretextos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in questionLetramento acadêmico: interpretação textual em questãoAcademic literacyReading and text interpretationArgumentative textsLetramento acadêmicoLeitura e interpretação textualTexto argumentativoMost students entering superior education find difficulties concerning text interpretation. Doubts regarding thematic, the author´s point of view, and mainly the arguments the author uses to defend these points of view are common when tasks are proposed with argumentative texts. In this sense, based on propositions of Paula Carlino (2009) for teaching reading and writing in superior education (academic literacy), and the Greimas semiotic as theoretical and methodological support, this article follows the analysis of an opinion text aiming to provide methodological grants to help newcomers to graduation in working with this textual form. Differences between opinion and argument, forms of argumentation, and semantic structure of the texts are issues discussed from the text in analysis.A maioria dos alunos ingressantes no nível de ensino superior encontra dificuldades relacionadas à interpretação textual. Dúvidas em relação à temática, ao ponto de vista que o autor assume e principalmente aos argumentos que o autor utiliza para defender seu ponto de vista são comuns quando se propõem tarefas com textos argumentativos. Nesse sentido, tomando como base propostas de Paula Carlino (2009) para o ensino da leitura e da escrita no nível superior (letramento acadêmico), e tendo como aporte teórico-metodológico a semiótica greimasiana, neste artigo procede-se à análise de um texto de opinião no intuito de fornecer subsídios metodológicos que auxiliem alunos recém-chegados à graduação no trabalho com essa modalidade textual. Diferença entre opinião e argumento, formas de argumentação, e organização semântica dos textos são questões discutidas a partir do texto em análise.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2014-10-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/1556910.5433/1519-5392.2014v14n1p100Entretextos; v. 14 n. 1 (2014); 100-1182764-08091519-5392reponame:Revista Entretextosinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569/15202Copyright (c) 2014 Entretextosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrestani, Luciana MariaSouza, Clínio Jorge deNeder, Cristiane PiementelCunha, Jaeder Fernandes2021-04-27T19:34:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15569Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextosPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/oai||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br1519-53922764-0809opendoar:2021-04-27T19:34:43Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question Letramento acadêmico: interpretação textual em questão |
title |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question |
spellingShingle |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question Crestani, Luciana Maria Academic literacy Reading and text interpretation Argumentative texts Letramento acadêmico Leitura e interpretação textual Texto argumentativo |
title_short |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question |
title_full |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question |
title_fullStr |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question |
title_full_unstemmed |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question |
title_sort |
Academic literacy: textual interpretation in question |
author |
Crestani, Luciana Maria |
author_facet |
Crestani, Luciana Maria Souza, Clínio Jorge de Neder, Cristiane Piementel Cunha, Jaeder Fernandes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Clínio Jorge de Neder, Cristiane Piementel Cunha, Jaeder Fernandes |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Crestani, Luciana Maria Souza, Clínio Jorge de Neder, Cristiane Piementel Cunha, Jaeder Fernandes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Academic literacy Reading and text interpretation Argumentative texts Letramento acadêmico Leitura e interpretação textual Texto argumentativo |
topic |
Academic literacy Reading and text interpretation Argumentative texts Letramento acadêmico Leitura e interpretação textual Texto argumentativo |
description |
Most students entering superior education find difficulties concerning text interpretation. Doubts regarding thematic, the author´s point of view, and mainly the arguments the author uses to defend these points of view are common when tasks are proposed with argumentative texts. In this sense, based on propositions of Paula Carlino (2009) for teaching reading and writing in superior education (academic literacy), and the Greimas semiotic as theoretical and methodological support, this article follows the analysis of an opinion text aiming to provide methodological grants to help newcomers to graduation in working with this textual form. Differences between opinion and argument, forms of argumentation, and semantic structure of the texts are issues discussed from the text in analysis. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-10-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569 10.5433/1519-5392.2014v14n1p100 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1519-5392.2014v14n1p100 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15569/15202 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Entretextos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Entretextos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Entretextos; v. 14 n. 1 (2014); 100-118 2764-0809 1519-5392 reponame:Revista Entretextos instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista Entretextos |
collection |
Revista Entretextos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799315388350070784 |