Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araujo, Maria Isabel
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131
Resumo: It also addresses the debate about the revitalization of the res judicata in the civil suit of the individual cognitive tutelage when the sentence goes against constitutional norms or principles. It highlights that only the existent sentences, which lead to res judicata unconstitutional or unjust, may be relativized. It sees the principle of proportionality as a method or criterion adequate to solve the conflict of values that arises when the law enforcer is faced with an unfair or unconstitutional sentence. Only the consideration upon values, in a true case, is able to determine whether the res judicata must be kept or not in the juridical order. To relativize the res judicata unconstitutional a de-constitutive action is proposed, with the same characteristics of a rescinding action, but not subject to terms of duration.
id UEL-6_e8e0b67d5d74ac87c4579a490d812213
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4131
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suitRelativização da coisa julgada material no processo civil brasileiroRes judicataprinciple of proportionalityrelativization.Coisa julgadaprincípio da proporcionalidaderelativização.It also addresses the debate about the revitalization of the res judicata in the civil suit of the individual cognitive tutelage when the sentence goes against constitutional norms or principles. It highlights that only the existent sentences, which lead to res judicata unconstitutional or unjust, may be relativized. It sees the principle of proportionality as a method or criterion adequate to solve the conflict of values that arises when the law enforcer is faced with an unfair or unconstitutional sentence. Only the consideration upon values, in a true case, is able to determine whether the res judicata must be kept or not in the juridical order. To relativize the res judicata unconstitutional a de-constitutive action is proposed, with the same characteristics of a rescinding action, but not subject to terms of duration.Trata da polêmica sobre a relativização da coisa julgada no processo civil de tutela cognitiva individual, quando a sentença afronta normas ou princípios constitucionais. Enfoca que somente as sentenças existentes, que produzem coisa julgada inconstitucional ou injusta, podem ser relativizadas. Aponta o princípio da proporcionalidade como método ou critério adequado para resolver o conflito de valores. Somente a ponderação de valores, no caso concreto, é capaz de determinar se a coisa julgada deve ser mantida ou não na ordem jurídica. Para relativizar a coisa julgada inconstitucional propõe o cabimento de uma ação desconstitutiva, com as mesmas características da ação rescisória, mas não sujeita a prazo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2006-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/413110.5433/2178-8189.2006v10n0p203Scientia Iuris; v. 10 (2006); 203-2242178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131/3545Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraujo, Maria Isabel2009-12-22T14:07:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4131Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2009-12-22T14:07:11Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
Relativização da coisa julgada material no processo civil brasileiro
title Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
spellingShingle Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
Araujo, Maria Isabel
Res judicata
principle of proportionality
relativization.
Coisa julgada
princípio da proporcionalidade
relativização.
title_short Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
title_full Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
title_fullStr Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
title_full_unstemmed Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
title_sort Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
author Araujo, Maria Isabel
author_facet Araujo, Maria Isabel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araujo, Maria Isabel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Res judicata
principle of proportionality
relativization.
Coisa julgada
princípio da proporcionalidade
relativização.
topic Res judicata
principle of proportionality
relativization.
Coisa julgada
princípio da proporcionalidade
relativização.
description It also addresses the debate about the revitalization of the res judicata in the civil suit of the individual cognitive tutelage when the sentence goes against constitutional norms or principles. It highlights that only the existent sentences, which lead to res judicata unconstitutional or unjust, may be relativized. It sees the principle of proportionality as a method or criterion adequate to solve the conflict of values that arises when the law enforcer is faced with an unfair or unconstitutional sentence. Only the consideration upon values, in a true case, is able to determine whether the res judicata must be kept or not in the juridical order. To relativize the res judicata unconstitutional a de-constitutive action is proposed, with the same characteristics of a rescinding action, but not subject to terms of duration.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131
10.5433/2178-8189.2006v10n0p203
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2006v10n0p203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131/3545
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 10 (2006); 203-224
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306013331947520