Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131 |
Resumo: | It also addresses the debate about the revitalization of the res judicata in the civil suit of the individual cognitive tutelage when the sentence goes against constitutional norms or principles. It highlights that only the existent sentences, which lead to res judicata unconstitutional or unjust, may be relativized. It sees the principle of proportionality as a method or criterion adequate to solve the conflict of values that arises when the law enforcer is faced with an unfair or unconstitutional sentence. Only the consideration upon values, in a true case, is able to determine whether the res judicata must be kept or not in the juridical order. To relativize the res judicata unconstitutional a de-constitutive action is proposed, with the same characteristics of a rescinding action, but not subject to terms of duration. |
id |
UEL-6_e8e0b67d5d74ac87c4579a490d812213 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4131 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suitRelativização da coisa julgada material no processo civil brasileiroRes judicataprinciple of proportionalityrelativization.Coisa julgadaprincípio da proporcionalidaderelativização.It also addresses the debate about the revitalization of the res judicata in the civil suit of the individual cognitive tutelage when the sentence goes against constitutional norms or principles. It highlights that only the existent sentences, which lead to res judicata unconstitutional or unjust, may be relativized. It sees the principle of proportionality as a method or criterion adequate to solve the conflict of values that arises when the law enforcer is faced with an unfair or unconstitutional sentence. Only the consideration upon values, in a true case, is able to determine whether the res judicata must be kept or not in the juridical order. To relativize the res judicata unconstitutional a de-constitutive action is proposed, with the same characteristics of a rescinding action, but not subject to terms of duration.Trata da polêmica sobre a relativização da coisa julgada no processo civil de tutela cognitiva individual, quando a sentença afronta normas ou princípios constitucionais. Enfoca que somente as sentenças existentes, que produzem coisa julgada inconstitucional ou injusta, podem ser relativizadas. Aponta o princípio da proporcionalidade como método ou critério adequado para resolver o conflito de valores. Somente a ponderação de valores, no caso concreto, é capaz de determinar se a coisa julgada deve ser mantida ou não na ordem jurídica. Para relativizar a coisa julgada inconstitucional propõe o cabimento de uma ação desconstitutiva, com as mesmas características da ação rescisória, mas não sujeita a prazo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2006-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/413110.5433/2178-8189.2006v10n0p203Scientia Iuris; v. 10 (2006); 203-2242178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131/3545Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraujo, Maria Isabel2009-12-22T14:07:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4131Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2009-12-22T14:07:11Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit Relativização da coisa julgada material no processo civil brasileiro |
title |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit |
spellingShingle |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit Araujo, Maria Isabel Res judicata principle of proportionality relativization. Coisa julgada princípio da proporcionalidade relativização. |
title_short |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit |
title_full |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit |
title_fullStr |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit |
title_sort |
Relativization of the material “res judicata” in the brazilian civil suit |
author |
Araujo, Maria Isabel |
author_facet |
Araujo, Maria Isabel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araujo, Maria Isabel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Res judicata principle of proportionality relativization. Coisa julgada princípio da proporcionalidade relativização. |
topic |
Res judicata principle of proportionality relativization. Coisa julgada princípio da proporcionalidade relativização. |
description |
It also addresses the debate about the revitalization of the res judicata in the civil suit of the individual cognitive tutelage when the sentence goes against constitutional norms or principles. It highlights that only the existent sentences, which lead to res judicata unconstitutional or unjust, may be relativized. It sees the principle of proportionality as a method or criterion adequate to solve the conflict of values that arises when the law enforcer is faced with an unfair or unconstitutional sentence. Only the consideration upon values, in a true case, is able to determine whether the res judicata must be kept or not in the juridical order. To relativize the res judicata unconstitutional a de-constitutive action is proposed, with the same characteristics of a rescinding action, but not subject to terms of duration. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131 10.5433/2178-8189.2006v10n0p203 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2006v10n0p203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4131/3545 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 10 (2006); 203-224 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306013331947520 |