BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Nunes Jr., Vidal Serrano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988
Resumo: The article deals with the current characteristics ofthe Brazilian system of judicial review, specially the diffusecontrol’s abstraction. In order to do that, it studies theunconstitutionality theory, the Brazilian judicial review systemand its mitigation through the “abstraction” which aims to objectthe diffuse control, charging it with the typical effects of theabstract control. Besides evaluating the benefits and drawbacksof this trend, it investigates the binding docket as a proper wayof using it in the Brazilian legal system, and granting the bindingand erga omnes effects to the diffuse control´s decisions withoutthe Senate participation.
id UEL-6_f82e7c6054f458c19ba0b2c6b317654a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10988
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?Súmulas vinculantes: solução para a adequada abstrativização do controle difuso de constitucionalidade?Binding DocketConstitutionality ControlAbstrativizationBrazilian Supreme Court.Súmula VinculanteControle de ConstitucionalidadeAbstrativizaçãoSupremo Tribunal Federal.The article deals with the current characteristics ofthe Brazilian system of judicial review, specially the diffusecontrol’s abstraction. In order to do that, it studies theunconstitutionality theory, the Brazilian judicial review systemand its mitigation through the “abstraction” which aims to objectthe diffuse control, charging it with the typical effects of theabstract control. Besides evaluating the benefits and drawbacksof this trend, it investigates the binding docket as a proper wayof using it in the Brazilian legal system, and granting the bindingand erga omnes effects to the diffuse control´s decisions withoutthe Senate participation.O artigo aborda as características atuais do sistema decontrole de constitucionalidade brasileiro, em especial a almejadaabstrativização do controle difuso. Para tanto, estuda a teoriada inconstitucionalidade, os sistemas de controle, o hibridismobrasileiro e a sua mitigação através da abstrativização, que almejaobjetivar o controle difuso, imputando-lhe efeitos típicos docontrole abstrato. Além de analisar os benefícios e prejuízosdesta tendência, investiga as súmulas vinculantes como formaadequada de implantá-la no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro pararegular concessão de efeito erga omnes e vinculante às decisõesde controle difuso de constitucionalidade sem participação do Senado Federal.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/1098810.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p113Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 113-1362178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988/11534Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZamarian, Lívia PitelliNunes Jr., Vidal Serrano2012-12-05T16:50:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10988Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2012-12-05T16:50:52Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
Súmulas vinculantes: solução para a adequada abstrativização do controle difuso de constitucionalidade?
title BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
spellingShingle BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli
Binding Docket
Constitutionality Control
Abstrativization
Brazilian Supreme Court.
Súmula Vinculante
Controle de Constitucionalidade
Abstrativização
Supremo Tribunal Federal.
title_short BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
title_full BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
title_fullStr BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
title_full_unstemmed BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
title_sort BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
author Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli
author_facet Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli
Nunes Jr., Vidal Serrano
author_role author
author2 Nunes Jr., Vidal Serrano
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli
Nunes Jr., Vidal Serrano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Binding Docket
Constitutionality Control
Abstrativization
Brazilian Supreme Court.
Súmula Vinculante
Controle de Constitucionalidade
Abstrativização
Supremo Tribunal Federal.
topic Binding Docket
Constitutionality Control
Abstrativization
Brazilian Supreme Court.
Súmula Vinculante
Controle de Constitucionalidade
Abstrativização
Supremo Tribunal Federal.
description The article deals with the current characteristics ofthe Brazilian system of judicial review, specially the diffusecontrol’s abstraction. In order to do that, it studies theunconstitutionality theory, the Brazilian judicial review systemand its mitigation through the “abstraction” which aims to objectthe diffuse control, charging it with the typical effects of theabstract control. Besides evaluating the benefits and drawbacksof this trend, it investigates the binding docket as a proper wayof using it in the Brazilian legal system, and granting the bindingand erga omnes effects to the diffuse control´s decisions withoutthe Senate participation.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988
10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p113
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p113
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988/11534
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 113-136
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306013755572225