BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988 |
Resumo: | The article deals with the current characteristics ofthe Brazilian system of judicial review, specially the diffusecontrol’s abstraction. In order to do that, it studies theunconstitutionality theory, the Brazilian judicial review systemand its mitigation through the “abstraction” which aims to objectthe diffuse control, charging it with the typical effects of theabstract control. Besides evaluating the benefits and drawbacksof this trend, it investigates the binding docket as a proper wayof using it in the Brazilian legal system, and granting the bindingand erga omnes effects to the diffuse control´s decisions withoutthe Senate participation. |
id |
UEL-6_f82e7c6054f458c19ba0b2c6b317654a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10988 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION?Súmulas vinculantes: solução para a adequada abstrativização do controle difuso de constitucionalidade?Binding DocketConstitutionality ControlAbstrativizationBrazilian Supreme Court.Súmula VinculanteControle de ConstitucionalidadeAbstrativizaçãoSupremo Tribunal Federal.The article deals with the current characteristics ofthe Brazilian system of judicial review, specially the diffusecontrol’s abstraction. In order to do that, it studies theunconstitutionality theory, the Brazilian judicial review systemand its mitigation through the “abstraction” which aims to objectthe diffuse control, charging it with the typical effects of theabstract control. Besides evaluating the benefits and drawbacksof this trend, it investigates the binding docket as a proper wayof using it in the Brazilian legal system, and granting the bindingand erga omnes effects to the diffuse control´s decisions withoutthe Senate participation.O artigo aborda as características atuais do sistema decontrole de constitucionalidade brasileiro, em especial a almejadaabstrativização do controle difuso. Para tanto, estuda a teoriada inconstitucionalidade, os sistemas de controle, o hibridismobrasileiro e a sua mitigação através da abstrativização, que almejaobjetivar o controle difuso, imputando-lhe efeitos típicos docontrole abstrato. Além de analisar os benefícios e prejuízosdesta tendência, investiga as súmulas vinculantes como formaadequada de implantá-la no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro pararegular concessão de efeito erga omnes e vinculante às decisõesde controle difuso de constitucionalidade sem participação do Senado Federal.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/1098810.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p113Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 113-1362178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988/11534Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZamarian, Lívia PitelliNunes Jr., Vidal Serrano2012-12-05T16:50:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10988Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2012-12-05T16:50:52Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION? Súmulas vinculantes: solução para a adequada abstrativização do controle difuso de constitucionalidade? |
title |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION? |
spellingShingle |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION? Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli Binding Docket Constitutionality Control Abstrativization Brazilian Supreme Court. Súmula Vinculante Controle de Constitucionalidade Abstrativização Supremo Tribunal Federal. |
title_short |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION? |
title_full |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION? |
title_fullStr |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION? |
title_full_unstemmed |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION? |
title_sort |
BINDING DECISIONS: SOLUTION TO PROPER DIFFUSE CONTROL´S ABSTRACTION? |
author |
Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli |
author_facet |
Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli Nunes Jr., Vidal Serrano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nunes Jr., Vidal Serrano |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zamarian, Lívia Pitelli Nunes Jr., Vidal Serrano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Binding Docket Constitutionality Control Abstrativization Brazilian Supreme Court. Súmula Vinculante Controle de Constitucionalidade Abstrativização Supremo Tribunal Federal. |
topic |
Binding Docket Constitutionality Control Abstrativization Brazilian Supreme Court. Súmula Vinculante Controle de Constitucionalidade Abstrativização Supremo Tribunal Federal. |
description |
The article deals with the current characteristics ofthe Brazilian system of judicial review, specially the diffusecontrol’s abstraction. In order to do that, it studies theunconstitutionality theory, the Brazilian judicial review systemand its mitigation through the “abstraction” which aims to objectthe diffuse control, charging it with the typical effects of theabstract control. Besides evaluating the benefits and drawbacksof this trend, it investigates the binding docket as a proper wayof using it in the Brazilian legal system, and granting the bindingand erga omnes effects to the diffuse control´s decisions withoutthe Senate participation. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988 10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p113 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p113 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/10988/11534 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 113-136 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306013755572225 |