THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15556 |
Resumo: | Analogies are comparisons made between different domains. They are used in education to communicate new concepts; they allow transferring knowledge from one area to another. Generally, comparisons are made between a field observable and a non-observable, an abstract and a concrete, a stranger and an acquaintance. Many Biology and Science teachers use analogies to make their lessons more attractive and understandable. However, the use of analogies requires some care to undesirable concepts of analog pass on what you want to teach. For to collaborate with the quality of teaching biology, this research sought to find out the preconceptions that student teachers have about biology analogies and whether these concepts could be altered and its analogies could be more structured after an educational intervention in the form of short course , which were worked out the basics of using analogies as a teaching resource Data were obtained by a written questionnaire administered before and after the intervention to a group of fourth years of undergraduate biology of a public institution of higher education. The results showed that most students could not correctly define and exemplify analogy and did not differentiate between analogy and metaphor. After the educational intervention, the student teachers seemed to have presented conceptual changes: conceptualized and illustrated analogy correctly; knew differentiate analogy of other terms and recognized the analogies as important teaching tools. This study intended to cooperate with the recognition of the use of analogies as an effective teaching methods and stimulating, thereby contributing to a science teaching more attractive and creative. |
id |
UEM-11_4d26a6378b91bd7021e439312d919fa3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/15556 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-11 |
network_name_str |
Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEESO CONCEITO DE ANALOGIAS POR LICENCIANDOS DE BIOLOGIAAnalogySciences teachingTeacher formationDidacticsAnalogiaEnsino de CiênciasFormação de professoresDidáticaAnalogies are comparisons made between different domains. They are used in education to communicate new concepts; they allow transferring knowledge from one area to another. Generally, comparisons are made between a field observable and a non-observable, an abstract and a concrete, a stranger and an acquaintance. Many Biology and Science teachers use analogies to make their lessons more attractive and understandable. However, the use of analogies requires some care to undesirable concepts of analog pass on what you want to teach. For to collaborate with the quality of teaching biology, this research sought to find out the preconceptions that student teachers have about biology analogies and whether these concepts could be altered and its analogies could be more structured after an educational intervention in the form of short course , which were worked out the basics of using analogies as a teaching resource Data were obtained by a written questionnaire administered before and after the intervention to a group of fourth years of undergraduate biology of a public institution of higher education. The results showed that most students could not correctly define and exemplify analogy and did not differentiate between analogy and metaphor. After the educational intervention, the student teachers seemed to have presented conceptual changes: conceptualized and illustrated analogy correctly; knew differentiate analogy of other terms and recognized the analogies as important teaching tools. This study intended to cooperate with the recognition of the use of analogies as an effective teaching methods and stimulating, thereby contributing to a science teaching more attractive and creative.As analogias são comparações feitas entre domínios diferentes. São usadas no ensino para comunicar conceitos novos, pois permitem transferir o conhecimento de uma área para outra. Geralmente, fazem comparações entre um domínio observável e um não-observável, um abstrato e um concreto, um desconhecido e um conhecido. Muitos professores de Biologia e Ciências recorrem às analogias para tornarem suas aulas mais atrativas e compreensíveis. Entretanto, o uso das analogias exige certos cuidados para que conceitos não-desejáveis do análogo passem para o que se quer ensinar. Para colaborar com a qualidade do ensino de Biologia, esta pesquisa procurou saber quais são os conceitos prévios que licenciandos de Biologia possuem sobre analogias e verificar se esses conceitos poderiam ser alterados e suas analogias ser mais estruturadas após uma intervenção pedagógica, na forma de minicurso. Nesta atividade foram trabalhados os fundamentos do uso de analogias como recurso didático. Os dados foram obtidos por meio de um questionário aplicado antes e depois da intervenção a uma turma de licenciandos do quarto ano de Biologia de uma instituição pública de Ensino Superior. Os resultados mostraram que a maioria dos acadêmicos não conseguia definir e exemplificar corretamente analogia enão sabia diferenciar analogia de metáfora. Após a intervenção pedagógica, os licenciandos apresentarammudanças conceituais: passaram a conceituar e exemplificar analogia corretamente; souberam diferenciar analogia de outros termos e reconheceram as analogias como importantes ferramentas didáticas. Esta pesquisa pretendeu colaborar com o reconhecimento do uso de analogias como uma metodologia didática eficaz e estimulante, colaborando assim para um ensino das ciências mais atrativo e criativo.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2011-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/1555610.4025/tpe.v13i3.15556Teoria e Prática da Educação; v. 13 n. 3 (2010); 19-312237-87071415-837Xreponame:Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15556/8426Rigolon, Rafael GustavoObara, Ana Tiyomiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-12T13:53:52Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/15556Revistahttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEducPUBhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/oaiteoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com || teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com2237-87071415-837xopendoar:2023-01-12T10:59:22.244450Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES O CONCEITO DE ANALOGIAS POR LICENCIANDOS DE BIOLOGIA |
title |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES |
spellingShingle |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES Rigolon, Rafael Gustavo Analogy Sciences teaching Teacher formation Didactics Analogia Ensino de Ciências Formação de professores Didática |
title_short |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES |
title_full |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES |
title_fullStr |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES |
title_sort |
THE CONCEPT OF ANALOGIES FOR BIOLOGY LICENSEES |
author |
Rigolon, Rafael Gustavo |
author_facet |
Rigolon, Rafael Gustavo Obara, Ana Tiyomi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Obara, Ana Tiyomi |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rigolon, Rafael Gustavo Obara, Ana Tiyomi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Analogy Sciences teaching Teacher formation Didactics Analogia Ensino de Ciências Formação de professores Didática |
topic |
Analogy Sciences teaching Teacher formation Didactics Analogia Ensino de Ciências Formação de professores Didática |
description |
Analogies are comparisons made between different domains. They are used in education to communicate new concepts; they allow transferring knowledge from one area to another. Generally, comparisons are made between a field observable and a non-observable, an abstract and a concrete, a stranger and an acquaintance. Many Biology and Science teachers use analogies to make their lessons more attractive and understandable. However, the use of analogies requires some care to undesirable concepts of analog pass on what you want to teach. For to collaborate with the quality of teaching biology, this research sought to find out the preconceptions that student teachers have about biology analogies and whether these concepts could be altered and its analogies could be more structured after an educational intervention in the form of short course , which were worked out the basics of using analogies as a teaching resource Data were obtained by a written questionnaire administered before and after the intervention to a group of fourth years of undergraduate biology of a public institution of higher education. The results showed that most students could not correctly define and exemplify analogy and did not differentiate between analogy and metaphor. After the educational intervention, the student teachers seemed to have presented conceptual changes: conceptualized and illustrated analogy correctly; knew differentiate analogy of other terms and recognized the analogies as important teaching tools. This study intended to cooperate with the recognition of the use of analogies as an effective teaching methods and stimulating, thereby contributing to a science teaching more attractive and creative. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15556 10.4025/tpe.v13i3.15556 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15556 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/tpe.v13i3.15556 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15556/8426 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Teoria e Prática da Educação; v. 13 n. 3 (2010); 19-31 2237-8707 1415-837X reponame:Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) |
collection |
Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com || teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1792207155982499840 |