Learning and cognitive development

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117
Resumo: For decades an explanation for failure in schooling in the first grades has been the concern of researchers. In Brazil it was only in the 80s that studies have been undertaken so that a link between learning difficulties and performance in Piaget’s operational tests could be found. Results of these studies may be grouped in three categories: a) studies indicating a strict relationship among variables; b) studies that show certain difficulties in nonconservative children in reading and writing and in mathematics; c) studies that state that results of Piaget’s tests do not have any relationship with success in reading and writing and in mathematics. Interest in the present analysis is due to these controversial results. Its aim is to verify whether there exist significant differences at operational level among children who have a good or bad class performance. Two hundred 6 to 10 year-old children from the first two lower grades of four public schools in Maringá, Paraná, Brazil, took part in the research. Children sat for Raven’s Progressive Matrixes Test and Stein’s Class Performance Test. Four groups of 15 children each were formed according to results, combining the grade (first or second) with class performance (good or bad). Groups were compared with regard to performance in five Piaget’s tests (classification, class inclusion, mass conservation, length conservation and mental image). Results show that there were no considerable differences among grade groups at operational level. It may be concluded that schools have not benefited from the knowledge of stages in the construction of cognitive competence towards the practice of significant learning.
id UEM-3_7d9ddffced6abe8eb91d3ff96939f898
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/4117
network_acronym_str UEM-3
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Learning and cognitive developmentAprendizagem e desenvolvimento cognitivoaprendizagemdesenvolvimentoavaliaçãoFor decades an explanation for failure in schooling in the first grades has been the concern of researchers. In Brazil it was only in the 80s that studies have been undertaken so that a link between learning difficulties and performance in Piaget’s operational tests could be found. Results of these studies may be grouped in three categories: a) studies indicating a strict relationship among variables; b) studies that show certain difficulties in nonconservative children in reading and writing and in mathematics; c) studies that state that results of Piaget’s tests do not have any relationship with success in reading and writing and in mathematics. Interest in the present analysis is due to these controversial results. Its aim is to verify whether there exist significant differences at operational level among children who have a good or bad class performance. Two hundred 6 to 10 year-old children from the first two lower grades of four public schools in Maringá, Paraná, Brazil, took part in the research. Children sat for Raven’s Progressive Matrixes Test and Stein’s Class Performance Test. Four groups of 15 children each were formed according to results, combining the grade (first or second) with class performance (good or bad). Groups were compared with regard to performance in five Piaget’s tests (classification, class inclusion, mass conservation, length conservation and mental image). Results show that there were no considerable differences among grade groups at operational level. It may be concluded that schools have not benefited from the knowledge of stages in the construction of cognitive competence towards the practice of significant learning.Há décadas a busca de explicação para o fracasso escolar nas séries iniciais tem sido objeto de preocupação de pesquisadores de diversas áreas. Entretanto, percebe-se que foi somente na década de 80 que começaram a ser realizados estudos brasileiros que visam encontrar alguma relação entre dificuldades de aprendizagem e desempenho nas provas operatórias propostas por Piaget. Os resultados de tais estudos podem ser agrupados em três categorias: a) trabalhos que encontram uma estreita relação entre as variáveis; b) trabalhos que apontam certas dificuldades apresentadas pelas crianças não-conservadoras, em tarefas relativas à alfabetização e à matemática; e c) trabalhos que afirmam não terem os resultados nas provas piagetianas qualquer relação com o sucesso na alfabetização e na aprendizagem matemática. Em função desses resultados controversos surgiu o interesse pela realização do presente estudo, o qual teve como objetivo verificar se existem diferenças significativas, quanto ao nível operatório, entre crianças que apresentam um bom ou um mau desempenho escolar. Participaram do estudo 200 crianças, com idade entre 6 e 10 anos, matriculadas na 1ª e na 2ª séries do 1º grau em quatro escolas públicas de Maringá, Paraná, Brasil. Essas crianças foram submetidas ao Teste das Matrizes Progressivas de Raven e ao Teste de Desempenho Escolar de Stein. A partir dos resultados encontrados nesses instrumentos foram constituídos quatro grupos, de 15 crianças cada, combinando-se a série (1ª e 2ª) com o desempenho escolar (bom e mau). Estes grupos foram comparados, quanto ao seu desempenho, em cinco provas piagetianas (de classificação, de inclusão de classes, de conservação de massa, de conservação de comprimento e de imagem mental). Os resultados indicaram que não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos das duas séries, no que se refere ao nível operatório. Concluiu-se que a escola não tem aproveitado o conhecimento das etapas de construção das competências cognitivas para a realização de uma prática que propicie uma aprendizagem significativa.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2008-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/411710.4025/actascihumansoc.v22i0.4117Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 22 (2000); 95-101Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 22 (2000); 95-1011807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117/2822Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T17:35:28Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/4117Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2022-11-23T17:35:28Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Learning and cognitive development
Aprendizagem e desenvolvimento cognitivo
title Learning and cognitive development
spellingShingle Learning and cognitive development
Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo
aprendizagem
desenvolvimento
avaliação
title_short Learning and cognitive development
title_full Learning and cognitive development
title_fullStr Learning and cognitive development
title_full_unstemmed Learning and cognitive development
title_sort Learning and cognitive development
author Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo
author_facet Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aprendizagem
desenvolvimento
avaliação
topic aprendizagem
desenvolvimento
avaliação
description For decades an explanation for failure in schooling in the first grades has been the concern of researchers. In Brazil it was only in the 80s that studies have been undertaken so that a link between learning difficulties and performance in Piaget’s operational tests could be found. Results of these studies may be grouped in three categories: a) studies indicating a strict relationship among variables; b) studies that show certain difficulties in nonconservative children in reading and writing and in mathematics; c) studies that state that results of Piaget’s tests do not have any relationship with success in reading and writing and in mathematics. Interest in the present analysis is due to these controversial results. Its aim is to verify whether there exist significant differences at operational level among children who have a good or bad class performance. Two hundred 6 to 10 year-old children from the first two lower grades of four public schools in Maringá, Paraná, Brazil, took part in the research. Children sat for Raven’s Progressive Matrixes Test and Stein’s Class Performance Test. Four groups of 15 children each were formed according to results, combining the grade (first or second) with class performance (good or bad). Groups were compared with regard to performance in five Piaget’s tests (classification, class inclusion, mass conservation, length conservation and mental image). Results show that there were no considerable differences among grade groups at operational level. It may be concluded that schools have not benefited from the knowledge of stages in the construction of cognitive competence towards the practice of significant learning.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-07-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v22i0.4117
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v22i0.4117
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117/2822
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 22 (2000); 95-101
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 22 (2000); 95-101
1807-8656
1679-7361
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actahuman@uem.br
_version_ 1799317507684696064