Learning and cognitive development
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117 |
Resumo: | For decades an explanation for failure in schooling in the first grades has been the concern of researchers. In Brazil it was only in the 80s that studies have been undertaken so that a link between learning difficulties and performance in Piaget’s operational tests could be found. Results of these studies may be grouped in three categories: a) studies indicating a strict relationship among variables; b) studies that show certain difficulties in nonconservative children in reading and writing and in mathematics; c) studies that state that results of Piaget’s tests do not have any relationship with success in reading and writing and in mathematics. Interest in the present analysis is due to these controversial results. Its aim is to verify whether there exist significant differences at operational level among children who have a good or bad class performance. Two hundred 6 to 10 year-old children from the first two lower grades of four public schools in Maringá, Paraná, Brazil, took part in the research. Children sat for Raven’s Progressive Matrixes Test and Stein’s Class Performance Test. Four groups of 15 children each were formed according to results, combining the grade (first or second) with class performance (good or bad). Groups were compared with regard to performance in five Piaget’s tests (classification, class inclusion, mass conservation, length conservation and mental image). Results show that there were no considerable differences among grade groups at operational level. It may be concluded that schools have not benefited from the knowledge of stages in the construction of cognitive competence towards the practice of significant learning. |
id |
UEM-3_7d9ddffced6abe8eb91d3ff96939f898 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/4117 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-3 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Learning and cognitive developmentAprendizagem e desenvolvimento cognitivoaprendizagemdesenvolvimentoavaliaçãoFor decades an explanation for failure in schooling in the first grades has been the concern of researchers. In Brazil it was only in the 80s that studies have been undertaken so that a link between learning difficulties and performance in Piaget’s operational tests could be found. Results of these studies may be grouped in three categories: a) studies indicating a strict relationship among variables; b) studies that show certain difficulties in nonconservative children in reading and writing and in mathematics; c) studies that state that results of Piaget’s tests do not have any relationship with success in reading and writing and in mathematics. Interest in the present analysis is due to these controversial results. Its aim is to verify whether there exist significant differences at operational level among children who have a good or bad class performance. Two hundred 6 to 10 year-old children from the first two lower grades of four public schools in Maringá, Paraná, Brazil, took part in the research. Children sat for Raven’s Progressive Matrixes Test and Stein’s Class Performance Test. Four groups of 15 children each were formed according to results, combining the grade (first or second) with class performance (good or bad). Groups were compared with regard to performance in five Piaget’s tests (classification, class inclusion, mass conservation, length conservation and mental image). Results show that there were no considerable differences among grade groups at operational level. It may be concluded that schools have not benefited from the knowledge of stages in the construction of cognitive competence towards the practice of significant learning.Há décadas a busca de explicação para o fracasso escolar nas séries iniciais tem sido objeto de preocupação de pesquisadores de diversas áreas. Entretanto, percebe-se que foi somente na década de 80 que começaram a ser realizados estudos brasileiros que visam encontrar alguma relação entre dificuldades de aprendizagem e desempenho nas provas operatórias propostas por Piaget. Os resultados de tais estudos podem ser agrupados em três categorias: a) trabalhos que encontram uma estreita relação entre as variáveis; b) trabalhos que apontam certas dificuldades apresentadas pelas crianças não-conservadoras, em tarefas relativas à alfabetização e à matemática; e c) trabalhos que afirmam não terem os resultados nas provas piagetianas qualquer relação com o sucesso na alfabetização e na aprendizagem matemática. Em função desses resultados controversos surgiu o interesse pela realização do presente estudo, o qual teve como objetivo verificar se existem diferenças significativas, quanto ao nível operatório, entre crianças que apresentam um bom ou um mau desempenho escolar. Participaram do estudo 200 crianças, com idade entre 6 e 10 anos, matriculadas na 1ª e na 2ª séries do 1º grau em quatro escolas públicas de Maringá, Paraná, Brasil. Essas crianças foram submetidas ao Teste das Matrizes Progressivas de Raven e ao Teste de Desempenho Escolar de Stein. A partir dos resultados encontrados nesses instrumentos foram constituídos quatro grupos, de 15 crianças cada, combinando-se a série (1ª e 2ª) com o desempenho escolar (bom e mau). Estes grupos foram comparados, quanto ao seu desempenho, em cinco provas piagetianas (de classificação, de inclusão de classes, de conservação de massa, de conservação de comprimento e de imagem mental). Os resultados indicaram que não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos das duas séries, no que se refere ao nível operatório. Concluiu-se que a escola não tem aproveitado o conhecimento das etapas de construção das competências cognitivas para a realização de uma prática que propicie uma aprendizagem significativa.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2008-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/411710.4025/actascihumansoc.v22i0.4117Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 22 (2000); 95-101Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 22 (2000); 95-1011807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117/2822Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T17:35:28Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/4117Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2022-11-23T17:35:28Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Learning and cognitive development Aprendizagem e desenvolvimento cognitivo |
title |
Learning and cognitive development |
spellingShingle |
Learning and cognitive development Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo aprendizagem desenvolvimento avaliação |
title_short |
Learning and cognitive development |
title_full |
Learning and cognitive development |
title_fullStr |
Learning and cognitive development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Learning and cognitive development |
title_sort |
Learning and cognitive development |
author |
Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo |
author_facet |
Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Yaegashi, Solange Franci Raimundo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
aprendizagem desenvolvimento avaliação |
topic |
aprendizagem desenvolvimento avaliação |
description |
For decades an explanation for failure in schooling in the first grades has been the concern of researchers. In Brazil it was only in the 80s that studies have been undertaken so that a link between learning difficulties and performance in Piaget’s operational tests could be found. Results of these studies may be grouped in three categories: a) studies indicating a strict relationship among variables; b) studies that show certain difficulties in nonconservative children in reading and writing and in mathematics; c) studies that state that results of Piaget’s tests do not have any relationship with success in reading and writing and in mathematics. Interest in the present analysis is due to these controversial results. Its aim is to verify whether there exist significant differences at operational level among children who have a good or bad class performance. Two hundred 6 to 10 year-old children from the first two lower grades of four public schools in Maringá, Paraná, Brazil, took part in the research. Children sat for Raven’s Progressive Matrixes Test and Stein’s Class Performance Test. Four groups of 15 children each were formed according to results, combining the grade (first or second) with class performance (good or bad). Groups were compared with regard to performance in five Piaget’s tests (classification, class inclusion, mass conservation, length conservation and mental image). Results show that there were no considerable differences among grade groups at operational level. It may be concluded that schools have not benefited from the knowledge of stages in the construction of cognitive competence towards the practice of significant learning. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-07-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v22i0.4117 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v22i0.4117 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4117/2822 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 22 (2000); 95-101 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 22 (2000); 95-101 1807-8656 1679-7361 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actahuman@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317507684696064 |