Discursos concorrentes sobre direitos trabalhistas fundamentais no Supremo Tribunal Federal: um estudo de caso em Análise Crítica de Discurso (ADPF nº 324/2018 e RE nº 958.252/MG)

• Autor(a) principal: Antelo, Luiza Ribeiro
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: [e-mail]
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/19920
• topic: Globalization; Employment law; Labor relations; Outsourcing; Critical discourse analysis; Globalização; Direito do trabalho; Relações de trabalho; Terceirização; ADPF 324/2018; Análise crítica de discurso; CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PRIVADO::DIREITO DO TRABALHO

This dissertation aims to analyze the construction of competing discourses on fundamental employment rights through the judgment of Federal Supreme Court’s judgment of ADPF 324/2018 and RE 958.252/MG, which declared the constitutionality of outsourcing in core activities. The judgment is considered as a relevant discursive sample of of the transformation process related to labor law within the scope of the judiciary, in the context of the political and economic crisis that began after 2014 and the labor reform in 2017. The investigation is based on the theoretical-methodological framework proposed by Lilie Chouliaraki and Norman Fairclough (1999). The legal concept of "social value of work" and its relationship with the concept of "free initiative", identified in Article 1º, IV, were identified as essential points for the construction of different theses on the constitutionality of core activities. of the Federal Constitution of 1988. It was observed that such concepts were used in a strategic way to legitimize different results from particular conceptions about the roots of problems in labor relations, which justify different legal approaches, capable of promoting different concrete effects within the context of the judicial institutions and more broadly, over the whole society.