O registro da sentença de usucapião coletiva

• Autor(a) principal: Pimentel, Fabricio Andrade Ferreira Girardin
• Data de Publicação: 2009
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/9179
• topic: Statute of the City; Collective adverse possession; Adjudication; Record. Feasibility; Usucapião; Sentenças; Propriedade urbana; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PRIVADO

The Statute of the City reoriented the group of themes regarding the urban landing organization and regularization. In this context, the collective adverse possession is significant. The adverse possession, which is an instrument of great social consequence, has as one of its purposes to oppose the social exclusion, facilitating the right to own the property to the lacking layers of the population. The way the collective adverse possession was treated in the Statute of the City is effective, as legal institute, to be implemented. Such institute does not depend on any new statute to regulate its application, needing to be oriented only by its own constitutional principles that already govern the matter. The adjudication of collective adverse possession, which is reported on paragraphs 2nd and 3rd, of section 10, of the Statute of the City, will serve as title deed to be recorded on the Register of Property. The referred adjudication will define the respective fraction of soil of each new holder. There is nothing to discuss about the feasibility of the applicability of this matter, except that it has to be implemented. The adjudication rended on the records of a trial of collective adverse possession should be taken to be recorded such as any another adverse possession, in other words, the description of the individual fractions has to be consigned the same way it already exists in section 28, subsection I, section 167 of the Law of Public Records (Law n. 6.015/1973).